Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Stepped down or stripped?Has Simpkun stepped down from the captaincy yet?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Might be the one.
Might be the one.
Look, when you boil it down, there are lots of positives and lots of negatives for all three players for the captaincy, it almost has to be Harry or Tristan for the captaincy. Lets forget the negatives for a moment and ask ourselves a few interesting questions shall we. Harry, he's not a child, he can handle it, truly special players that lead clubs can make magical things happen, for instance our captains over the years maybe apart from the odd couple, have been tryers, not one more year, not two more years, NOW, why?Larkey says the right things and often doesn't do them. Sheezel says the right things and does them if he can. X says the right things and then pile drives his opponent. Parker unfortunately isn't looking like a candidate at the moment. Decisions, decisions
I'm not a fan of co-captains. Okay if you have a contending list with a leadership and talent group that bats deep, it can work then.What does Clarko and his staff want the team identity to become over the next couple of seasons?
If we want a ball-dominating, silky, attacking outfit then the club should pick Harry.
If we want a hard, combative and relentless team then X is the guy.
If we want a selfless, low ego team that produces consistent effort supporting each other on and off pitch then it is Nick.
The choice of captain sets a tone and sends a message. All 3 options are valid which might point to a co-captain scenario.
I want thisX for me
Larkey and Sheeze for Vice.
Ultimately, any mix of the three.
Larkey’s a good VC, but as plenty have mentioned, he does love a little flop now and then — always fishing for the whistle.
Selwood got the frees though, whereas Larkey gets largely bupkis — which only winds him up even more. Not saying a lot of the frees aren’t there, but he’s his own worst enemy at times with how he reacts.Not an issue for the best ducker of all time, Joel Selwood.
If any player ever compensated for flopping with his footy, it was Joel Selwood. Dragged his team across the line more times than I could count. The only things Souv drags are his hands through his hairNot an issue for the best ducker of all time, Joel Selwood.