- Oct 20, 2014
- 18,399
- 19,531
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
You need to forget about the past and deal in the present. Don’t make me have to tell Maggie5 that you have an obsession with Obama in the Trump thread.The difference is that Trump sought that reaction.
From the start, he went out of his way to be controversial and to polarise opinion, to say nothing of his obvious character flaws and corrupt conduct. And in office, he has played exclusively to his base while heavy-handedly eroding norms at home and abroad. People like Steve Bannon (and you?) welcome this. They like the fact he's a "disrupter". So you can't then claim to be bemused by the reaction. Because the reaction is baked into his approach, which is explicitly designed to provoke.
Obama was the opposite. He bent over backwards to be conciliatory. He was left-leaning on social issues but more or less centrist in policy, and in temperament and approach his impulse was to seek consensus. He was entirely within the mainstream of modern US politics. In light of that, the fearmongering around him remains inexplicable, unless you sheet it all home to racism, which seems to me an oversimplification.
You didn't answer my question: did you clap when Trump promoted birtherism? That example alone highlights the differences between Trump and Obama. So of course people object to Trump for doing s**t like that. On the other hand, what did Obama do that warranted such reaction?
You're not skilled enough to execute this pivot.
My criticisms of Trump are not my criticisms of BoJo and Morrison. Don't conflate.
Johnson has the opportunity to be a successful PM. He's not Trump, despite whatever the "new right" fanboys want to claim. He'd be too left-wing for the current GOP. So how much common ground do you want to claim? Is your kindergarten "new right" worldview aligned with Trump or Johnson? Because they're not the same.
Morrison just strikes me as a non-factor who inherited the leadership by default and then held out an unconvincing challenger. Even within the party, he was the 4th choice? Seems quite telling.