Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 19: Law and Odour

[ShanDog]

Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! Congrats to Nikita Blue for our new thread title!

Joe Biden, 46th President Thread is over there ->

< - Trump Part 18 is back there.

 

[magpie_marty]

My guess is he signed 4 checks

 

[60 Yards Out]

And neither is illegal.

Correct, but irrelevant.

 

[magpie_marty]

So because he is makes money from being employed he can't be a grifter. Interesting argument.

Define a grifter.
Gold shoes a Bible every truth social post is a beg for a donation.

 

[OneGreatClub]

As expected

How does he get away with this stuff. Maybe Alito and Thomas can be dismissed too, and Cannon?

 

[campbell]

Define a grifter.
Gold shoes a Bible every truth social post is a beg for a donation.

I still hear, gypsies tramps and thieves and think of that family.

 

[Schulzenfest]

As expected

Now just to be clear, because the vague wording in this headline is deliberately not clear; the Court has said it will consider the appeal, not that it will grant the appeal.

 

[campbell]

Now just to be clear, because the vague wording in this headline is deliberately not clear; the Court has said it will consider the appeal, not that it will grant the appeal.

and was awhile ago, not today.

 

[E Shed]

You read that Seth Abrahamson thread, yeah? You noticed the donation requests throughout it, so you must have read it.

The thread, which you have read, explains thoroughly and objectively that the hush money aspect isn't the aspect that was illegal, the illegal aspect was the falsifying of business records. Not only do we know this, but we know that you know this, because we've established that you read the thread. And yet you still post the above.

So again, I ask you, what is the point of your existence on this forum? You do nothing but post bad faith arguments that are easily picked apart by anybody with the slightest knowledge. And what's worse, you know that they are bad faith arguments that are easily picked apart, and you've been around here long enough to know that the posters on here will pick them apart. So why do you post them?

You're articulate with good English and grammar, so I assume you're not a total moron who simply isn't intelligent enough to see the flaws in your arguments, so that explanation is out. If you actually genuinely believed in the positions that you're espousing, I assume you would argue more strongly in favour of them, so that explanation seems to be out too. It leaves me genuinely struggling to come up with an explanation other than 'secret leftie who is doing some sort of performance art on the worst of right-wing discourse'. Nothing else rationally explains your behaviour.

It's just another bot/troll doing the Bannon - flood the zone thing. The only way to stop these threads getting polluted with pages and pages of people attempting to reason with a bad faith actor is just don't engage. If no one bothers to argue with these people(?) once its been established they argue in band faith then they can't keep hijacking things with crap.

 

[DaTBird187]

You read that Seth Abrahamson thread, yeah? You noticed the donation requests throughout it, so you must have read it.

The thread, which you have read, explains thoroughly and objectively that the hush money aspect isn't the aspect that was illegal, the illegal aspect was the falsifying of business records. Not only do we know this, but we know that you know this, because we've established that you read the thread. And yet you still post the above.

So again, I ask you, what is the point of your existence on this forum? You do nothing but post bad faith arguments that are easily picked apart by anybody with the slightest knowledge. And what's worse, you know that they are bad faith arguments that are easily picked apart, and you've been around here long enough to know that the posters on here will pick them apart. So why do you post them?

You're articulate with good English and grammar, so I assume you're not a total moron who simply isn't intelligent enough to see the flaws in your arguments, so that explanation is out. If you actually genuinely believed in the positions that you're espousing, I assume you would argue more strongly in favour of them, so that explanation seems to be out too. It leaves me genuinely struggling to come up with an explanation other than 'secret leftie who is doing some sort of performance art on the worst of right-wing discourse'. Nothing else rationally explains your behaviour.

 

[jatz14]

Other than to be re-elected don't you mean?

The US system is built around donations.

Are you trying to suggest that the Dems don't try and extract every last cent they can out of their base?

I thought I made it clear that just getting money is by itself, not a grift. And if Trump was just getting money for his campaign, thats not grifting either.

Its the grifting bit, thats the grift.

 

[OneGreatClub]

The grifter and the trophy wife playboy centerfold.
What did she actually do as First Lady?
Americans are so shallow in their interpretation of beauty and what is wonderful.

 

[OneGreatClub]

Gotta feel for them

 

[troybe]

There’s always that fine line between support and cultish, but who knows where that line is drawn

 

[Satan]

View attachment 1993182

There’s always that fine line between support and cultish, but who knows where that line is drawn

Barrons graduation present?

 

[GreyCrow]

Gotta feel for them

I liked the last line where they cant find lawyers to represent them

Maybe pay your bills you losers

 

[Chief]

only done to demean Trump.

Trump has demeaned himself many times. What's one more?

 

[darrenmorgan]

Trump has demeaned himself many times. What's one more?

and of course, Donald himself always goes high, he would never demean anyone else in public...

 

[Maggie5]

and was awhile ago, not today.

The author of that tweet is a Fox News Producer, here are some of other 'news stories'.

 

[Satan]

Will the thug in paul pelosi federal case be pardoned by Trump if he gets in ?

 

[OneGreatClub]

Trump has demeaned himself many times. What's one more?

And demeans everyone who isn’t loyal to him, not to mention mocking the disabled and war heroes

 

[OneGreatClub]

The author of that tweet is a Fox News Producer, here are some of other 'news stories'.

View attachment 1993403

Well
That puts a different light on it

 

[60 Yards Out]

Trump has demeaned himself many times. What's one more?

And many other people.

 

[OneGreatClub]

 

[captain blood 17]

Now just to be clear, because the vague wording in this headline is deliberately not clear; the Court has said it will consider the appeal, not that it will grant the appeal.

Correct. As i said. As expected. This will now draw it out past November.

 

[OneGreatClub]

Correct. As i said. As expected. This will now draw it out past November.

That’s the plan with all these Trump judges.