Try msg 9442Also I'm betting they don't want to mention Cohen has dropped his fusion GPS lawsuit over his claim the dossier is fake.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Try msg 9442Also I'm betting they don't want to mention Cohen has dropped his fusion GPS lawsuit over his claim the dossier is fake.
Comey must have followed Tania Hird idea of taking contemperous notes .This could be why.
Twitter Wonders Why House Republicans Pushed For Release of Comey Memos: Nunes ‘Is An Imbecile’
https://www.mediaite.com/online/twi...-release-of-comey-memos-nunes-is-an-imbecile/
This thread moves at a rapid rate.Try msg 9442
Thats why you use the ignore feature to ignore the crap and read my silk postsThis thread moves at a rapid rate.
It's not Tanias idea, it's a practice lawyers use for situations where they need to.Comey must have followed Tania Hird idea of taking contemperous notes .
Replying to random comments is not stalking, referenceing someone multiple times is.
Well, maybe I like stalkers.By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
I was being facetious about Tania and saving Jimmys hideIt's not Tanias idea, it's a practice lawyers use for situations where they need to.
More importantly his memos were sent to himself to prove the contemporaneous nature of the notes.
Trumpeters going very quiet on the content of the Coomey memos
Suggest that you stop tagging me in unrelated posts, that would be a good start as I do see it as stalking. Yes I am accusing you! Report me!Accusing a poster here of stalking amounts to personal abuse floodbuster given that "trolling" is the recognised term for the internet.
fyi floodbuster much as I search can only find myself "referencing " Maggie 16 times in this thread since Jan 27.
By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
and Mastenator 53 times since December.
The disparity numbers don't surprise me - I don't rate Mags all that highly.
Suggest you stop falling for that "damsel in distress" rescue stuff , go back to exercising the brain cells.
Accusing a poster here of stalking amounts to personal abuse floodbuster given that "trolling" is the recognised term for the internet.
fyi floodbuster much as I search can only find myself "referencing " Maggie 16 times in this thread since Jan 27.
By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
and Mastenator 53 times since December.
The disparity numbers don't surprise me - I don't rate Mags all that highly.
Suggest you stop falling for that "damsel in distress" rescue stuff , go back to exercising the brain cells.
This is the sort of reply I would expect from the RW media/Rep when they got the memos and found they have nothing.
The idiots still cannot see the cons they continue to fall for.From what I have seen from his interviews, there isn't anything in those memos that hasn't been known. So Nunes has produced another 'nothing burger'.
Well, maybe I like stalkers.
What got my back up is the insinuation that she wants NK to drop nukes just to prove you wrong.
That meme was generalised and you made it personal.
Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics. And how awkward would it be if you turned out to be wrong?You Mod the conspiracy board and the science thread? While pushing clearly BS conspiracies? Yikes.
"Facepalm"Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics.
I won't be wrong. Your PhD in Physics has given you zero ability to detect obvious bullsh*t. That is hardly surprising as physics is not related to analysing human communication. It is more of a shame that it hasn't taught you that studying one field of study may not give you any expertise on unrelated fields of study. That should be something you can extrapolate, especially with how specific they often make PhDs.Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics. And how awkward would it be if you turned out to be wrong?
Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.
You obviously know sfa about the US Justice System. None of these were criminal charges, only civil cases. These cases are pretty hard to defend against so the rich will just pay money to make it go away instead of fighting an expensive case against someone who is given free legals.No, commiting a crime makes you a crim like racial discrimination, laundering money (his fathers) through his casino or setting up a fraudulent University.
Luckily for him bankruptcy means washing you hands of responsibilities instead of what it means here and the ability to settle out of court to ensure no guilty verdict is recorded.
His sources might be anonymous but you accuse Trump of Russian collusion when there has been no evidence released to the public so far!A few anonymous sources there. Surely that is not enough to believe as true?
I come across so many similar sources, but still have doubt. I may post but more often than not as either something to consider but other times as a joke.
My preference is to believe more of what I see and hear than what I read.