Remove this Banner Ad

5 Rounds in Pick your AA side

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Only 2 players from the 3rd team on the ladder!! Interesting. Not even a mention for Pendlebury.

You sure your 'Aussie Gun' hasn't shot yourself in the foot?
Ladder positions shouldn't matter too much. Collingwood have been very even apart from O'Brien, Wellingham and Thomas. Shaw would be close for a HB spot. Swan has been consistent but nothing special. Didak has been ok. Sidebottom, Beams and Pendlebury have a few standout performances amongst them. Overall I can't see many standouts from Collingwood, not they have been poor, they have just had an even contribution from everyone.

That's how I see it but I could be underrating guys like Swan.
 
Youre only 3rd cos thew maggots handed you the game in Round 2 against Melbourne.


We have been a much better team than you this year, and deserve more All Australians.
The ladder tends to disagree with your overly emotional assessment.

You had 120 minutes to win that match, your team dropped a mark in the goal square in the last minute. Melbourne only have themselves to blame for not WINNING that match. You should have won that match 10 mins out from the finish, BUT you didnt.

Melboure would only have 2 contenders for AA at this stage, and Sylvia isn't one of them.
 
are you dumb? there is no correlation between ladder place and amount of AA selections.

You can have your entire team play at B+ level and win many games yet none of those warrant AA but a bottom of the ladder team can have 5 individuals playing at a A+ level whilst the rest of the team is playing shit thus warranting 5 AA selections.
There was a very heavy correlation the other year when Geelong had half the AA and were top of the ladder. Its a fair bet to assume that the top ranked teams would get a proportional amount of AA consideration. its always been the case.

Or are you too moronic to notice?
 
There was a very heavy correlation the other year when Geelong had half the AA and were top of the ladder. Its a fair bet to assume that the top ranked teams would get a proportional amount of AA consideration. its always been the case.

Or are you too moronic to notice?

That was one team that won 21/22, tell me about the rest of the clubs you idiot.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Ladder positions shouldn't matter too much. Collingwood have been very even apart from O'Brien, Wellingham and Thomas. Shaw would be close for a HB spot. Swan has been consistent but nothing special. Didak has been ok. Sidebottom, Beams and Pendlebury have a few standout performances amongst them. Overall I can't see many standouts from Collingwood, not they have been poor, they have just had an even contribution from everyone.

That's how I see it but I could be underrating guys like Swan.
Swan has been avreage for most games, very quiet. but H Shaw and harry O for starters would most definitely be top contenders. Pendlebury for sure would come into consideration because he is an accumulative type player not a flashy type. And he keeps racking them up, sometimes unnoticed. Maxwell is carrying on as he was last year, altho a little quiet on Sunday compared to his usual standard. There are 4 shoe ins just for the squad.
 
aww diddums, have you had a hard season already?

Not taking this premiership favouritism too well after a few losses are we?


looks like my hyper intellect and cutting edge insight has disturbed your inner balance, good day to you sir.

To compound how dim witted you are:

3rd Place on the ladder last year: 2 AAs
4th Place on the ladder: 3 AAs
5th Place on the ladder: 1 AA
7th Place on the ladder: 2 AA

Ohhh but 5th place should have more than 7th, man up you piece of shit.
 
looks like my hyper intellect and cutting edge insight has disturbed your inner balance, good day to you sir.
and here we were all thinking that you had run out of your anti psychotic medication.

Go figure!

Do you often get this vitriolic when others opinions differ from yours? Is abuse your first port of call in a debate? I am sure a hypo ( sic) intellect like yours could muster something more than name calling.







On second thoughts....................................
 
Whether or not Brady Rawlings should be AA is debatable.

Disregarding him because he is boring to watch?

Well.. That's just plain ignorant.
 
and here we were all thinking that you had run out of your anti psychotic medication.

Go figure!

Do you often get this vitriolic when others opinions differ from yours? Is abuse your first port of call in a debate? I am sure a hypo ( sic) intellect like yours could muster something more than name calling.







On second thoughts....................................

Maybe you should stick to the topic and address the points in the reply I made earlier, you have made no valid arguments so far apart from 1 team out of 16 that finished first to back your bs.
 
Maybe you should stick to the topic and address the points in the reply I made earlier, you have made no valid arguments so far apart from 1 team out of 16 that finished first to back your bs.
So, you want me to stick to the topics, but also want to abuse me for stating one particular CORRECT fact. I am guessing if I go back thru the last 10 years of AA teams, there would be a heavy emphasis on players from the top of the table clubs.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Lets see your hyper intellect at work.
 
Some other Melbourne fans getting a bit carried away early on.

- Jamar would most likely get the second ruckman spot
- Frawley in contention for full back but probably miss out
- Sylvia has had a great start to the season but not even considered on only 2 games
- Good seasons but not AA so far Grimes, Green, Moloney, McDonald and Petterd

Not going to post a team as I haven't watched enough of all other teams
 
So, you want me to stick to the topics, but also want to abuse me for stating one particular CORRECT fact. I am guessing if I go back thru the last 10 years of AA teams, there would be a heavy emphasis on players from the top of the table clubs.

But feel free to prove me wrong. Lets see your hyper intellect at work.

You guess? haha, you like to make assumptions without doing the dirty work. Way to destroy your credibility, how about you go dig up the past 10 AA teams and break the count down for each team in the top 8 for respective years and prove the correlation to me.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Some other Melbourne fans getting a bit carried away early on.

- Jamar would most likely get the second ruckman spot
- Frawley in contention for full back but probably miss out
- Sylvia has had a great start to the season but not even considered on only 2 games
- Good seasons but not AA so far Grimes, Green, Moloney, McDonald and Petterd

Not going to post a team as I haven't watched enough of all other teams

As far as the HFF position goes I'd think Green has done enough to be in strong contention. You only good player in Round 1, and even though he wasn't fantastic this week was more than serviceable
 
You guess? haha, you like to make assumptions without doing the dirty work. Way to destroy your credibility, how about you go dig up the past 10 AA teams and break the count down for each team in the top 8 for respective years and prove the correlation to me.
OK

2000 from the top clubs:14 players, top 8: 18 players

2001 top 4:13 players, top 8: 19 players

2002, top 4: 12 players, top 8: 17 players

2003 top 4: 9 players, top 8: 17 players

2004 top 4: 11 players, top 8: 18 players

2005 top 4: 11 players, top 8: 14 players

2006 top 4: 12 players, top 8: 18 players

2007 top 4: 16 players, top 8: 18 players

2008 top 4: 13 players, top 8: 17 players

2009 top 4: 15 players, top 8: 20 players

57% of AA players come from the top 4 clubs ladder position at the end of the H&A.

80% of AA players come from the top 8 clubs, ladder position at the end of the H&A season


BWAHAHAHA

owned

LOL, awaiting your response
 
where did u get that stat from, id say hes conceded 5 or 6 goals max this year

Was mentioned in the pre-game of the Dons vs Pies match up.

Noted his run but also pointed out he needs to do more defensively, I tend to agree.

Easily the pies loosest backman.
 
Was mentioned in the pre-game of the Dons vs Pies match up.

Noted his run but also pointed out he needs to do more defensively, I tend to agree.

Easily the pies loosest backman.

I still think it's incorrect - this is channel 7 after all. One on one he is close to unbeatable.
 
B - Jack Grimes - James Frawley - Heath Grundy

HB - Bryce Gibbs - Brian Lake - Brendan Goddard

C - Aaron Davey - Gary Ablett - Chris Judd

HF - Colin Sylvia - Barry Hall - Ryan O'Keefe

F - Ricky Petterd - Matthew Pavlich - Paul Chapman

R - Mark Jamar - Brent Moloney - Ryan Griffen

IC - Brad Green - Aaron Sandilands - Luke Hodge - James McDonald
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

B - Jack Grimes - James Frawley - Heath Grundy

HB - Bryce Gibbs - Brian Lake - Brendan Goddard

C - Aaron Davey - Gary Ablett - Chris Judd

HF - Colin Sylvia - Barry Hall - Ryan O'Keefe

F - Ricky Petterd - Matthew Pavlich - Paul Chapman

R - Mark Jamar - Brent Moloney - Ryan Griffen

IC - Brad Green - Aaron Sandilands - Luke Hodge - James McDonald
Lol. Come on?
 
B - Jack Grimes - James Frawley - Heath Grundy

HB - Bryce Gibbs - Brian Lake - Brendan Goddard

C - Aaron Davey - Gary Ablett - Chris Judd

HF - Colin Sylvia - Barry Hall - Ryan O'Keefe

F - Ricky Petterd - Matthew Pavlich - Paul Chapman

R - Mark Jamar - Brent Moloney - Ryan Griffen

IC - Brad Green - Aaron Sandilands - Luke Hodge - James McDonald

Only 9 Dees?

That actually has to be the most ridiculous crap I've read on BF for a long time.
 
Only 9 Dees?

That actually has to be the most ridiculous crap I've read on BF for a long time.


Why?

We are by far the in-form side of the AFL.

Take away Round 1 which was clearly an aberration and we are 4-0 with a percentage of around 160. (Yes Im counting the Pies game as a win cos we were playing 18 vs their 21 and we still only lost by 1 point)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

5 Rounds in Pick your AA side

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top