- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Posts
- 40,199
- Reaction score
- 62,733
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Maybe, can't say I recall it though.
We were
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Geelong v Gold Coast - Rd 14 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 78% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
Maybe, can't say I recall it though.
Trading Keath was the right decision, based on his demands, and where the team list was at at the time.
Trading Keath for a used packet of chips, on the other hand...
I'll take your word for it but I thought it was down to Fischer McAsey and Dylan Stephens a month or so out and then in the weel leading into the draft it was touted as almost a certainty we were taking McAsey.We were
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Once Keath got a 4 years offer, we had no power in the trade since the Bulldogs knew this and other clubs wouldn't have offered him 4 years if he went to the PSD. He wasn't contracted and wasn't a FA.Trading Keath was the right decision, based on his demands, and where the team list was at at the time.
Trading Keath for a used packet of chips, on the other hand...
I'll take your word for it but I thought it was down to Fischer McAsey and Dylan Stephens a month or so out and then in the weel leading into the draft it was touted as almost a certainty we were taking McAsey.
Freeman would've come with this very situation in mind, but he wasn't good in his first real game for the 2s last weekAS CAPT Obvious now that Sloane is injured. We need to make a thorough review of our AFC SANFL top ups in Freeman, Boyle and McKenzie. Then we can broaden our search for the Jun Draft.
Let's be honest Shorty Freeman was awful and the speed he had as an 18 year old draftee looks to have deserted him altogether.Freeman would've come with this very situation in mind, but he wasn't good in his first real game for the 2s last week
Agreed, he was poor even when we were all over GlenelgLet's be honest Shorty Freeman was awful and the speed he had as an 18 year old draftee looks to have deserted him altogether.
First up after missing a couple of weeks but a very big improvement required for him to be a serious contender in the mid season draft.
Why do we keep selecting Hall? He's a terrible player.View attachment 1380046
ADELAIDE
League
F: Hinge, Fogarty, Pedlar
HF: Newchurch, Wright, Nankervis
C: Hall, Schoenberg, Milera
HB: Parnell, Borlase, Davis
B: Worrell, McAsey, Murray
R: Strachan, Boyle, Freeman
INT: Lewis, Clarke, Sharrad, Smithson, Hutchens
IN: Hinge, Clarke, Sharrad, Hutchens
OUT: Hately (AFL), Thilthorpe (AFL), Soligo (AFL), Hamill (AFL)
NEW: Mitch Hinge (Glenelg), Josh Smithson (West Adelaide/North Haven)
CENTRAL
League
F: Kendall, Fort, Cannizzaro
HF: East, Dorizzi, Grace
C: Olsson, Launer, Shaw
HB: Presbury, Montgomerie, M. Neagle
B: Weaver, Llewellyn, Buechner
R: McCormack, J. Schiller, T. Schiller
INT: Deakin, Gant, Iles, Reeves, Richard, Whitelum
IN: Cannizzaro, Dorizzi, J. Schiller, Olsson
OUT: Hoskin (calf), Lange
NEW: Jordan Dorizzi (Port District)
I thought he was a bit better last week, seemed to be around the ball a lot more.Why do we keep selecting Hall? He's a terrible player.
Hinge not straight back into the AFL team after a one week injury?
Disappointing
Not enough experience obviously. Another 100 games and he would have played injured.Hinge not straight back into the AFL team after a one week injury?
Disappointing
Sometimes players don't spend all game lining up the position they're named in on Thursday night.So the mid we selected with Pick 10 is stuck playing in a forward pocket while we play two top ups on the ball [emoji849]
He played a mix of forward and midfield last week in the SANFL but looks to still be om managed minutes....it would seem it's still a fitness issue with Luke.So the mid we selected with Pick 10 is stuck playing in a forward pocket while we play two top ups on the ball![]()
True. However, I see a clear difference between Berry and Pedlar (the Bash Brothers). Berry is an inside accumulator suited to playing on-ball all game. On the other hand, IMO, Pedlar is more suited to playing 50-50 mid/HFF (see Toby Greene), more mercurial with more episodic impact on games. So, I see more HFF in Pedlar, even when deemed completely fit.He played a mix of forward and midfield last week in the SANFL but looks to still be om managed minutes....it would seem it's still a fitness issue with Luke.
I'm sure as his fitness builds he'll be introduced to more midfield minutes.
I'm sure Darren Burgess would be having plenty of input into what he's capable of doing fitness wise.
Doubt we paid that much draft collateral without our expectation being Pedlar becomes the explosive midfielder we need.True. However, I see a clear difference between Berry and Pedlar (the Bash Brothers). Berry is an inside accumulator suited to playing on-ball all game. On the other hand, IMO, Pedlar is more suited to playing 50-50 mid/HFF (see Toby Greene), more mercurial with more episodic impact on games. So, I see more HFF in Pedlar, even when deemed completely fit.
He played a mix of forward and midfield last week in the SANFL but looks to still be om managed minutes....it would seem it's still a fitness issue with Luke.
I'm sure as his fitness builds he'll be introduced to more midfield minutes.
I'm sure Darren Burgess would be having plenty of input into what he's capable of doing fitness wise.
Sometimes players don't spend all game lining up the position they're named in on Thursday night.

