Alan Didak vs Robert Murphy

[Avni]

Who's the better player?

 

[Dave The Man]

Didak because he can make something Happen out of Nothing and has a Ton of X-Factor.

Murphy is a Very Good player but is more Predictable then Dids

 

[Rosstickle]

Murphy's probably a better player but Didak would be a better fit at the Tiges.

 

[jonesy86]

As pure forwards about even, Didak more mercurial, Murphy more consistent.

As midfielders Didak by a mile.

So Didak overall.

 

[SEEING EYE DOG]

I hate and despise Didak and I love Murphy,
but to be fair, Didak is the better player.

 

[jonoman89]

Didak in a heartbeat.

 

[Palmer Stoat]

Not much in it, I reckon. They're both quality.

I'd probably go Didak cos of the midfield factor.

 

[GrandBlue]

Even though I hate him, Didak. Down forward, they are about equal but Didak can play midfield and dominate it.

 

[celtic_pride]

Robert Murphy ...

I can understand why people would vote for Didak, but saying he is 'easily' the better player then Murphy is a joke ..

Some people rate Murphy harshly IMHO, he's a very very good player and more consistent player then Didak, and is a model citizen off the field as well, unlike Didak whom is beseiged with many behaviour issues that need to be addressed.

 

[Dylz48]

Robert Murphy ...

I can understand why people would vote for Didak, but saying he is 'easily' the better player then Murphy is a joke ..

Some people rate Murphy harshly IMHO, he's a very very good player and more consistent player then Didak, and is a model citizen off the field as well, unlike Didak whom is beseiged with many behaviour issues that need to be addressed.

ur full of it Murphy is a good player no doubt but to say he is more consistent then didak is a joke and the question was who is the better player not who's got the better off-field record otherwise Stuart McGill would be widely regarded as a better leg spinner then Shane Warne

 

[hellfire]

Robert Murphy ...

I can understand why people would vote for Didak, but saying he is 'easily' the better player then Murphy is a joke ..

Some people rate Murphy harshly IMHO, he's a very very good player and more consistent player then Didak, and is a model citizen off the field as well, unlike Didak whom is beseiged with many behaviour issues that need to be addressed.

More consistent at what? Not making the headlines? Didak is one of, if not our most consistent player.

And off-field issues have no relevance to who is the better player.

 

[Kahuna]

Didak easily, he has more X-factor and isn't of the park injured half the season. To be honest I think Murphy is overated, he has his moments though.

 

[Colin D'Cops]

Both talented players and different types of players, but Didak for me just has the edge over Murphy.

 

[RustyBeams]

Didak by a country mile.

 

[thebigboy]

Murphy is more consistant IMO but at there best Didak can tear a game apart.

 

[JohnD]

Didak is more talented.

Wouldn't have him in my team though, and wouldn't have him anywhere near impressionable young players. He's an ill-wind for a group's culture.

On that basis, Murphy by the length of the Flemington straight. Good player in his own right.