If Judd gets in ahead of Deledio purely because hes Judd, I'll spew.
I think you'll find it's more likely that Judd will get in ahead of Deledio purely because he's had a better year than Deledio!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If Judd gets in ahead of Deledio purely because hes Judd, I'll spew.
Ye? Get in touch mateI think you'll find it's more likely that Judd will get in ahead of Deledio purely because he's had a better year than Deledio!
No Franklin for shoe ins. C'monOk people, lets look at the shoe ins, IMO
N.Bock - Has become an A grade key back
Akermanis - Has not played like this since his AA/Brownlow years with the lions.
G.Ablett - Is one of the favorites come brownlow night,
B.Harvey - See above
J.Bartell - See above
M.Pavlich - One of few shining lights in, some what a dismal season.
May surprise some people, but S.Johnson - Is playing just aswell this year if not better than last year,
R.O'Keefe - Is the best hit up, 3rd tall forward in the game.
Riewoldt - Career best form, winning games finally,
Cox - Is still dominating with a broken foot (am not sure on the extent of the injury) Hille has been good but, cox has been good over an extended period of time.
Players to discount.
H.Shaw - Pies up, shaw up, pies down, shaw down.
B.Lake - Someone has already metnioned this, but is struggling to handle the power forwards.
Didak - Is not too bad, but their are better players out their, IMO
A few iffy players:
Medhurst - Has finally being hitting heights that was once placed on him,
Judd - Awesome when he has played, but not sure if he has been up to it all year.
Hille - Yes AA over the past 6 weeks, their have been 17 weeks to date,
Sandilands - Yes he gets 'hitouts' but why not to advantage, soes he really hold his own around the ground like a Hile or Cox, no not really,
Petrie - For mine, the best utility in the game, works around the ground aswell as being able to play in multiple postions.
Just a few players to think about.
Thoughts::
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Heath Shaw would be very lucky, had a pretty bad season. Sam Fisher and Andrew Mackie would have to be in front of him as rushing backs.
Havent heard the Porps name thrown around much, he would be a shoe in for the small forward position
B S. FISHER SCARLETT PRATT
HB H. SHAW BOCK MACKIE
C BLACK ABLETT COREY
HF RICHARDSON PAVLICH HARVEY
F MEDHURST FRANKLIN FEVOLA
FOLL COX COONEY BARTEL
INT GRIFFIN, BRADSHAW, MITCHELL, ENRIGHT
I reckon im spot on what do u guys think
B S. FISHER SCARLETT PRATT
HB H. SHAW BOCK MACKIE
C BLACK ABLETT COREY
HF RICHARDSON PAVLICH HARVEY
F MEDHURST FRANKLIN FEVOLA
FOLL COX COONEY BARTEL
INT GRIFFIN, BRADSHAW, MITCHELL, ENRIGHT
I reckon im spot on what do u guys think
I just mean that at least one of the backs would have to be one who can run with the ball. Mackie is good defensively and attacking.
Dale Morris (W.B) . . . . Matthew Scarlett (Geel). . . Daniel Pratt (KANG)
Corey Enright (GEEL). . . Nathan Bock (ADEL). . . . . . Sam Fisher (ST.K)
Brent Harvey (KANG). . . Brett Kirk (SYD) . . . . . . . . Adam Cooney (W.B)
Steven Johnson (GEEL) . Matthew Pavlich (FREM) . . Robert Murphy (W.B)
Jason Akermanis (W.B) . B.Fevola (CARL) . . . . . . . Lance Franklin (HAW)
Dean Cox (WCE) . . . . . G.Ablett (GEEL) . . . . . . . J.Bartell (GEEL)
Paul Medhurst (COLL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Matthew Richardson (RICH)
Simon Black (BRIS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . David Hille (ESS)
.
Very good team. I would have O'Keefe for Murphy and probably Harley or Bolton for Fisher, but hard to fault other wise
Hitouts- Cox 462 v Hille 324- Cox leading by over 40%
Disposals- Cox 373 v Hille 285 - Cox gets over 30% more
Marks- Cox 99 v Hille 92
Contested possessions- Cox 147 v Hille 141
Clearances- Cox 73 v Hille 52
Inside 50's- Cox 54 v Hille 51
Rebound 50's- Cox 42 v Hille 21
Bounces- Cox 16 v Hille 2
Uncontested possessions- Cox 224 v Hille 137
Disposal efficiency- Cox 68.6% v Hille 65.4%
Goal assists- Cox 6 v Hille 4
Clangers- Cox 47 v Hille 43- Yay Hille won, although he wins a lot less of the ball to stuff up
Contested marks- Cox 9 v Hille 22
Goals- Cox 9 v Hille 16
I don't reckon Pratt has been good enough this year. His 2007 was better I reckon.
Petrie playing every position on field kills him for things like AA spots, but he has been outrageous this year. Hasn't had a game sub-10 posessions, has a shitload of hitouts, kicked goals, tackles like a bastard.
...and also behind guys who are better defensively and just as attacking.
To me Mackie has done little. No idea why he's even in consideration in some ppls team.
Whilst Geelong fans may not like to hear this...he really does look like an average player looking better than he is due to being in a great side. One on one he's about as useful as Grant Birchall and whilst he's handy to pick up the scraps and set up some attack i cant see him in the mix anywhere.
Is becoming more consistent but AA standard ?...gimme a break. MUCH better this season going around even from his own club.
No, I chose important stats, the fact that Cox won them all doesn't mean I was biased in my selection, it simply means he's far outperforming Hille.You choose stupid stats to favour Cox. How is bounces an important stat for a ruckmen?
More important for defenders. The most important statistics for a ruckman are hitouts won/hitouts to advantage (both of which Hille is getting smashed in), then clearances and inside 50's, showing an ability to contribute to the side after the ball has hit the ground (Cox leads both of these two btw).You should have added 1%ers - Hille 37 v Cox 24 (most underrated stat in the game)
Disposal stats by themselves may be useless, which is why I included other stats to get a more complete picture (Hitouts, clearances, inside 50's, contested possessions etc.), and it became even more obvious that Hille is not at the same standard as Cox.I'm not denying that Cox is good however I'm just saying that stats are stupid and can be used to prove anything - Just because someone gets more of it doesn't mean they are a better player (Priddis for example). Hille has had a far greater influence and has won several games off of his own boot this year, in fact probably more games than West Coast has won in total.
That's nice. Totally pointless though. One game is really not important in the context of the whole season. He had a good game, and well done, but it doesn't undo the season long dominance that Cox has had over every other ruckman.When it was Hille vs Cox in the ruck - Cox got absolutely smashed.
Hille Vs Cox in a match:
Disposals - David Hille 27 - Dean Cox 14
Hit outs - David Hille 22 - Dean Cox 29
Marks - David Hille 9 - Dean Cox 5
Contested Marks - David Hille 2 - Dean Cox 0
Disposal Efficiency - David Hille 74% - Dean Cox 64%
Clearances - David Hille 3 - Dean Cox 2
Inside 50's - David Hille 6 - Dean Cox 2
Goals - David Hille 3 - Dean Cox 0
Contested Possessions - David Hille 14 - Dean Cox 5 (smashed).
See how easy it is to prove someone is better than someone else by statistics?
He may be AA ruckman, but only on the bench. Unless of course Cox doesn't play out the rest of the season, although as I have said he does have the advantage of playing for a Victorian side, while Cox is playing in a bottom four side across the other side of the country. The media bias may drive him to a spot that he doesn't deserve, but we'll have to wait and see.The fact is David Hille has had more of an impact on games and been more of a match winner and dominant player than Cox has this year. The media know's it, anyone who has watched Hille play this year knows it and he will be AA ruckmen without a doubt.
Anyone without Ryan O Keefe in thee team cannot be taken seriously!
B: Gilbee Scarlett Carrazzo
HB: Enright Milburn Burgoyne.P
C: Black Ablett Harvey
HF: O Keefe Pavlich Akermanis
F: Fevola Franklin Medhurst
R: Hille Bartel Cooney
Int: J.Brown, Cox, Richardson, Judd
Emer: Deledio, Kirk, Thompson, Mc Veigh
Anyone without Ryan O Keefe in thee team cannot be taken seriously!
B: Gilbee Scarlett Carrazzo
HB: Enright Milburn Burgoyne.P
C: Black Ablett Harvey
HF: O Keefe Pavlich Akermanis
F: Fevola Franklin Medhurst
R: Hille Bartel Cooney
Int: J.Brown, Cox, Richardson, Judd
Emer: Deledio, Kirk, Thompson, Mc Veigh