All Australian thread 2015

[dewah07]

I don't think Cotchin should be in any teams at this stage, but he's now moved into the top 10 AFLCA votes. However only a bit more than half of the top 10 are regularly getting named in teams right now. Food for thought.

Round 14 Leaderboard
100 Nat Fyfe (Fremantle)
69 Dan Hannebery (Sydney)
55 Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
52 David Armitage (St Kilda)
48 Matt Priddis (West Coast)
46 Andrew Gaff (West Coast)
45 Dayne Beams (Brisbane)
45 Todd Goldstein (North Melbourne)
44 Trent Cotchin (Richmond)
44 Dylan Shiel (GWS)

only thing i got from this list is screw you pendles u hack

 

[Joey2Milney]

I don't think Cotchin should be in any teams at this stage, but he's now moved into the top 10 AFLCA votes. However only a bit more than half of the top 10 are regularly getting named in teams right now. Food for thought.

Round 14 Leaderboard
100 Nat Fyfe (Fremantle)
69 Dan Hannebery (Sydney)
55 Scott Pendlebury (Collingwood)
52 David Armitage (St Kilda)
48 Matt Priddis (West Coast)
46 Andrew Gaff (West Coast)
45 Dayne Beams (Brisbane)
45 Todd Goldstein (North Melbourne)
44 Trent Cotchin (Richmond)
44 Dylan Shiel (GWS)

Ridiculous how far ahead Fyfe is in these awards, the Brownlow should be scrapped if he isn't leading at round 14.

 

[eaglespremiers]

Ridiculous how highly the coaches rate Priddis.
He's played his role excellently but, most games, there have been several better West Coast performances.
Really valuable this year, not top 5 in the league.

 

[gillo94]

Ridiculous how highly the coaches rate Priddis.
He's played his role excellently but, most games, there have been several better West Coast performances.
Really valuable this year, not top 5 in the league.

I think Gaff will make AA, at this stage at least, depends how he goes last half of year
McGovern and Kennedy too
Priddis not even AA last year amazing

 

[jc12]

Brandon Ellis wouldn't be near the team, doubt he'd even make the squad.
Rance and Riewoldt should be our only entries at this stage, with Martin a smokey on the HFF.

Ellis has been good but not that good , but I'm loving his development , he will be elite very soon .
Martin. I hope he makes it , very consistent, and more contested and in and under now too apart from his great outside work .
Cotchin , if he continues what he's been doing the last month or two till the end will make it easy . The guy is a freak and has lifted us to some great wins

 

[jc12]

Can't believe people are putting Brandon Ellis in the team. I've watched every Richmond game, he is a decent player but should be no chance for AA.

Riewoldt on the other hand should be in every team at this stage.

Yep, and rance too

 

[tek87]

if Cotchin keeps this up he will make the team. Luke Mcpharlin is playing extremely well and started great too. if he stays fit (big if) he should make it. Also if the dockers finish 2 or 3 games on top clear (doubtful), they deserve 5 players in the all australian team - most likely Sandilands, Fyfe, Mundy, Neale, Mcpharlin

 

[jakefooty23]

Matthew Boyd Alex Rance Easton Wood
Heath Shaw Luke Mcpharlin Garrick Ibbotson
Dylan Shiel Lachie Neale David Armitage
Michael Walters Jack Riewoldt Dustin Martin
Josh Bruce Josh Kennedy Chad Wingard
Aaron Sandilands Nat Fyfe Dan Hannebery
Andrew Gaff Scott Pendlebury Matthew Priddis Sam Mitchell

 

[Porked04]

Matthew Boyd Alex Rance Easton Wood
Heath Shaw Luke Mcpharlin Garrick Ibbotson
Dylan Shiel Lachie Neale David Armitage
Michael Walters Jack Riewoldt Dustin Martin
Josh Bruce Josh Kennedy Chad Wingard
Aaron Sandilands Nat Fyfe Dan Hannebery
Andrew Gaff Scott Pendlebury Matthew Priddis Sam Mitchell

Add in Bob Murphy for Ibbotson and maybe McGovern for McPharlin and think that's a pretty accurate side.

Really hope Neale gets in, such an underrated little gem

 

[jakefooty23]

Add in Bob Murphy for Ibbotson and maybe McGovern for McPharlin and think that's a pretty accurate side.

Really hope Neale gets in, such an underrated little gem

Yeah either all. Yeah Neale has had a great season

 

[Mitchell Madness]

Ridiculous how far ahead Fyfe is in these awards, the Brownlow should be scrapped if he isn't leading at round 14.

Mitchell would be a smokey
He's been much more noticeable than previous years, and has been a known vote getter

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

Matthew Boyd Alex Rance Easton Wood
Heath Shaw Luke Mcpharlin Garrick Ibbotson
Dylan Shiel Lachie Neale David Armitage
Michael Walters Jack Riewoldt Dustin Martin
Josh Bruce Josh Kennedy Chad Wingard
Aaron Sandilands Nat Fyfe Dan Hannebery
Andrew Gaff Scott Pendlebury Matthew Priddis Sam Mitchell

How on earth could you have Walters a head of Betts?

 

[Mofra]

Add in Bob Murphy for Ibbotson and maybe McGovern for McPharlin and think that's a pretty accurate side.

This, McGovern has been outstanding and surely deserves the CHB spot.
Betts deserves a go as the best small forward in he competition this year, and I'm one of the people that would have Goldy in as first ruck.

Will Gaff make it? He's been good but normally you need two years' worth of form for the AA selectors to take notice.

 

[Moist Biscuit]

How on earth could you have Walters a head of Betts?

Because it is his side? If you don't like it. Make your own.

 

[jakefooty23]

How on earth could you have Walters a head of Betts?

Is their any particular reason why you chose to ask why I had Walters over betts? Why not Wingard over betts?

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

Because it is his side? If you don't like it. Make your own.

No. I am going to question it if i dont this it is right or the poster is being bias. If you dont me disagreeing. Then deal with it.

 

[jakefooty23]

.

Will Gaff make it? He's been good but normally you need two years' worth of form for the AA selectors to take notice.

It's the All Australian for this year, not last year. Robbie gray had an average 2013 and in 2014 he turned elite and was all Australian.

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

Is their any particular reason why you chose to ask why I had Walters over betts? Why not Wingard over betts?

Because Wingard has had a better year then Walters? And since Betts has been the best small forward in the comp this year he should be in. Thus me questioning why walters is in the team over Betts

Betts, Wingard >>>>>> Bruest>> Elliot >>> Walters

 

[jakefooty23]

No. I am going to question it if i dont this it is right or the poster is being bias. If you dont me disagreeing. Then deal with it.

What's wrong with thinking Walters might be all Australian at the seasons end? If he keeps his current form up there's no doubt that he will be in it.

 

[dewah07]

Because Wingard has had a better year then Walters? And since Betts has been the best small forward in the comp this year he should be in. Thus me questioning why walters is in the team over Betts

Betts, Wingard >>>>>> Bruest>> Elliot >>> Walters

needs more lonie

 

[Vikingblood]

Because Wingard has had a better year then Walters? And since Betts has been the best small forward in the comp this year he should be in. Thus me questioning why walters is in the team over Betts

Betts, Wingard >>>>>> Bruest>> Elliot >>> Walters

Biased I know, but Betts would have to be an automatic inclusion at this stage of the year. And I would also have Gray as an automatic selection.

 

[jakefooty23]

Because Wingard has had a better year then Walters? And since Betts has been the best small forward in the comp this year he should be in. Thus me questioning why walters is in the team over Betts

Betts, Wingard >>>>>> Bruest>> Elliot >>> Walters

Walters has won more games off his boot this year then Wingard has, I'm not saying he's had a better season but it's debatable.

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

What's wrong with thinking Walters might be all Australian at the seasons end? If he keeps his current form up there's no doubt that he will be in it.

We are not talking about the end of the year? we are talking right now. Right now Walters has no right being in any AA team. I can say Travis Boak will be AA this year because he will have a great end to the year. But if i put him in my team now it looks ridiculous because there has been so many better players then him so far in the year. Right now it is silly to suggest that Walters has had a better year then Betts

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

Walters has won more games off his boot this year then Wingard has, I'm not saying he's had a better season but it's debatable.

Wingard and Betts have both had the better season then Walters. Simple as that. Look at their stats, watch more port and crows games.

 

[Spitter9]

Would many people have Shaun Higgins close to their team? Surely he makes the 40 man squad?