The mere notion that every team was stronger in the 90s is terrible anyway. New Zealand? Really? Sri Lanka? South Africa 07-16 didn’t lose a test series away and were arguably in the best 5-6 performed sides in history. No way is their 90s team beating that side.
Amazon's "The Test"
- Thread starter workhorse
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jul 31, 2010
- 8,750
- 12,107
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- S'roos, New Jets, Cronulla
- Moderator
- #127
There were some quite awful cricketers getting Test matches in the 90s. Robelinda's YouTube channel has a plethora of evidence of it. It's a classic case of the cricket you grew up watching will always be the best cricket.
Also I really hope you understand why your case in point has massive holes in it. If not I'm happy to go through some cases where the exact opposite is true.
even the West Indies side you could argue has a better or at least more rounded attack now than it did when it was Walsh, Ambrose, and any one of half a dozen gap fillers like Pedro Collins, Reon King, Franklin Rose, Corey Collymore, Merv Dillon, Jermaine Lawson, Kerry Jeremy etc
Of course there were awful cricketers. I don't need to watch it on youtube, I watched it at the time. There have been terrible players in all generations. This applies to all sports. That does not change what I am saying.
Believe me, I could make holes in any argument you have too. You could just agree to disagree with me and leave it at that. I doubt you are any more of an expert on this subject than I or anyone else.
Flintoff!!!
Yeah but Bairstow and Buttler are not!
Our pace bowling attack was pretty damn good so he wouldn’t fit in. It’d be between him and Harmison but without Broads bunny Davey, I’d probably stick with Harmy!
In that side, yes, Freddie is the better bowler
the issue in that sort of hypothetical is do you count the series or the career. if you're only looking at the series, well ok, you probably do keep the attack, overlooking anderson and broad, although Archer would have a fair shout, but then you woudn't keep Bell coz he wasn't the Ian Bell of 2010/11 and 2013, so you would end up making at least one change. whereas if you do the opposite, bell's place isn't in in doubt but anderson and broad surely come in
I disagree. I think his best is as good as most excellent new ball frontline bowlers but like his batting he simply didn’t produce it enough for me
and he is certainly the inferior batsman.
I could probably find room for both Flintoff and Stokes. Bell would probably come out.
Would have Bairstow comfortably ahead of Jones.
Would also have Broad ahead of Harmison. Harmison was great that series, but I felt underwhelmed otherwise, especially against Australia.
VirgilHilts
All Australian
- Mar 22, 2013
- 677
- 504
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Aston Villa, Warwickshire
I watched it all yesterday. As an England fan the most interesting bits for me were seeing the Aussies in defeat but I must admit the whole thing was engrossing. The reaction of the players when Stokes was doing his Headingley thing, i.e. 'He'll hit one down someone's throat sooner or later', suggests the lack of a plan, which would also explain why Paine didn't seem to understand what was going on. My favourite bit though was when Langer said of having Ponting around in the nets "it's like having read 100 self-help books." I thought, * me JL you probably have. I've never seen someone with so much passion and intensity talk so much waffle. Ponting seemed to be the only one in the entire set up who was actually giving practical advice. I was impressed with Mitch Marsh's irrepressible good spirits, Aaron Finch's honesty and and vulnerability, and Pat Cummins' intelligence. I must say I also admired Khawaja's determination to speak his mind, while the others just stared at their shoes. Didn't like Saker and Haddin, but to be fair never have: they seemed like relics of the previous mindset.
Think there's a bit too much reminiscing about the past there. I'd argue 5 potential changes. Root for Bell, Leach in for Giles, Archer/Broad and Stokes in for Harmison and Hoggard and despite Bairstow and Buttlers flaws I'd still argue they're both a better option that Jones.
Trescothick, Strauss, Vaughan, Root, Pietersen, Stokes, Flintoff, Buttler/Bairstow, Archer/Broad, Leach, Jones
There is no way you would bring in Stokes for Hoggard, it was the swing bowling that undid Australia in 2005 and Hoggard was vital to that. Its Stokes or Flintoff, not both. Picking too many all rounders is why we were s**t in the past!
But its once again do you consider career records or performances in that series? Because on recent history, Root isn't replacing anyone.
As for keepers, Bairstow and Buttler were horrendous last year.
Would've like a bit more on the Ashes and less on meaningless ODIs but it was a relevant story arc showing the team come from low to high.
I actually didn't mind Khawaja's part. The 'no one tells me what to do' was irritating but other than that he was an interesting person in the team. The premise of the show was built around the evolution of culture and team building. Khawaja made a pretty fair point when he said bonding is great and all but if you have a skilled team you're good and when you don't, you're no good. Despite the importance the doco placed on culture, pretty much none of the team's improvement came from players developing in the system. Smith came back and killed it. Marnus came from no where and killed it. The ODI team that got pumped in the England series didn't have any of Warner, Smith, Maxwell, Carey, Cummins, Starc or Zampa - all pretty clear members of the best XI. We were always going to get pumped then. A doco that banged on about selection and injury/resting players wouldn't be quite as appealing to some of course, so the culture thing made sense.
I really do like Paine and he came across well but time hasn't healed the mistakes he made. His bowling first craze in the Ashes was costly - probably of a series win. His review debacle and Stokes fields were obviously wrong but I can forgive them as pressure moments. The rogue bowl first call i struggle to fathom.
There were plenty of positives though.
As noted by others, Mitch Marsh came across as a legend. Was nice to see Langer mellow. His inclusive leadership style with bringing in Ponting, Waugh etc is good. I didn't get any tactical genius vibes from him so it's important that he has a good team. He clearly has the respect of the team and I think he seems like a pretty rational guy. Lyon was fantastic. He is clearly a crucial member of the team, on and off the field. The more years he hangs around for, the better.
The positive tone the doco ended on is backed up by the summer the team had. It really is in a good place now. Labuschagne changes the dynamic of the team. We still have a batting issue away from home but two reliable guns is a lot better than one.
I actually didn't mind Khawaja's part. The 'no one tells me what to do' was irritating but other than that he was an interesting person in the team. The premise of the show was built around the evolution of culture and team building. Khawaja made a pretty fair point when he said bonding is great and all but if you have a skilled team you're good and when you don't, you're no good. Despite the importance the doco placed on culture, pretty much none of the team's improvement came from players developing in the system. Smith came back and killed it. Marnus came from no where and killed it. The ODI team that got pumped in the England series didn't have any of Warner, Smith, Maxwell, Carey, Cummins, Starc or Zampa - all pretty clear members of the best XI. We were always going to get pumped then. A doco that banged on about selection and injury/resting players wouldn't be quite as appealing to some of course, so the culture thing made sense.
I really do like Paine and he came across well but time hasn't healed the mistakes he made. His bowling first craze in the Ashes was costly - probably of a series win. His review debacle and Stokes fields were obviously wrong but I can forgive them as pressure moments. The rogue bowl first call i struggle to fathom.
There were plenty of positives though.
As noted by others, Mitch Marsh came across as a legend. Was nice to see Langer mellow. His inclusive leadership style with bringing in Ponting, Waugh etc is good. I didn't get any tactical genius vibes from him so it's important that he has a good team. He clearly has the respect of the team and I think he seems like a pretty rational guy. Lyon was fantastic. He is clearly a crucial member of the team, on and off the field. The more years he hangs around for, the better.
The positive tone the doco ended on is backed up by the summer the team had. It really is in a good place now. Labuschagne changes the dynamic of the team. We still have a batting issue away from home but two reliable guns is a lot better than one.
VirgilHilts
All Australian
- Mar 22, 2013
- 677
- 504
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Aston Villa, Warwickshire
Exactly. Saker says in one of the coaching meetings that "the skill just isn't there".
Cleavy
Hall of Famer
Airdate: The Test | TV Tonight
Seven to screen sports doco on how the Australian team rebounded from the 2018 ball-tampering scandal.
not sure how you can cram 8 eps into a 2 hour version (incl ads)...
- Mar 11, 2018
- 8,149
- 12,482
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Airdate: The Test | TV Tonight
Seven to screen sports doco on how the Australian team rebounded from the 2018 ball-tampering scandal.tvtonight.com.au
not sure how you can cram 8 eps into a 2 hour version (incl ads)...
And there will be A LOT of ads
Carbine Chaos
The Gaff-er
- Apr 1, 2009
- 63,870
- 94,078
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
It’s reminding me that Finch played Tests. Yuck.
Want to look away when the Stokes bit comes haha.
Want to look away when the Stokes bit comes haha.
Art Vandelay_
TheBrownDog
- Oct 28, 2012
- 104,285
- 141,974
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
Really need it all or not worth watchingAirdate: The Test | TV Tonight
Seven to screen sports doco on how the Australian team rebounded from the 2018 ball-tampering scandal.
not sure how you can cram 8 eps into a 2 hour version (incl ads)...
Airdate: The Test | TV Tonight
Seven to screen sports doco on how the Australian team rebounded from the 2018 ball-tampering scandal.
not sure how you can cram 8 eps into a 2 hour version (incl ads)...
It put me to sleep but it seemed they crammed the losses into about 20 minutes, skipped the World Cup and mostly focused on Smith and the Ashes?
DEVO
Are We Not Men? We Are...
North Melbourne - 2024 Hugh Greenwood Player Sponsor
Veteran
North Melbourne - 2023 Ailish Considine and Bella Eddy Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - Bella Eddey and Vicki Wall Player Sponsor - Season 7
North Melbourne - 2023 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
10k Posts
Wordler
North Melbourne - 2022 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
- Sep 8, 2000
- 19,214
- 19,155
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Eels, Cumbrians, Staggies & Braves
It missed the entire one day series in India which seemed like a real turning point in the teams trajectory for me. The belief in the team after coming back to win that series really began to grow on that little tour.
- Feb 18, 2016
- 1,020
- 1,509
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
Channel 7 don’t have the rights to ODI cricket. No surprise they skipped all of that and just concentrated on the tests.
Cleavy
Hall of Famer
I think they just focused on the redemption, since everyone knows the backstory
Similar threads
- Poll
