jackcass
Cancelled
Might be all we can afford if we land Lynch, need some very cheap options.
1st year draftees would be cheaper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 11
SuperCoach Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - VC/C - Pendlebury Comp – Win A Badge - Fight MND Comp Returns ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - The VC/C Thread
Might be all we can afford if we land Lynch, need some very cheap options.
if smith is on the list next year we are going nowhere.
Smith is a better player than Scharenberg right now, statistically and in every other way.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think you'll find that Smith, Oxley and Thomas will go to the GC for Tom Lynch at the end of the year.
That's three players for one, so GCS definitely win that trade too.
Exactly, its more hope now than anything with Scharenberg. But it's been circumstantial.Smith averaged 19.6 disposals and 6.6 marks per game in 2016, so yeah, nothing outstanding from Scharenberg. And it's pretty evident watching that he hasn't done anything to get too excited about yet. He's had one good game V Port Melbourne in the VFL, that's it. Here's hoping etc.
Three genuine plodders/battlers for a genuine superstar key forward, lol.No way GC win that trade. Three borderline best 22 players are not worth Lynch. If we could get that deal done I would be staggered.
No way GC win that trade. Three borderline best 22 players are not worth Lynch. If we could get that deal done I would be staggered.
Three genuine plodders/battlers for a genuine superstar key forward, lol.
#BigFootyTrades
It was a joke guys. Smith and Oxley will be de-listed at years end and Thomas will be very lucky to be on our list. All likely to be de-listed. I should have thrown in Blair and Mayne for good measure.
I'll be very interested to see how Thomas goes this year with another preseason under his belt. Had a couple of very handy games in 2017 playing predominantly HF. Could surprise.
I'll be very interested to see how Thomas goes this year with another preseason under his belt. Had a couple of very handy games in 2017 playing predominantly HF. Could surprise.
Exactly, its more hope now than anything with Scharenberg. But it's been circumstantial.
With any luck he stays physically sound, and begins to build confidence in his own game. Big thing this year that I'm keen to see him improve on is when it comes to taking the play on with his field kicking.
As Kohli would say - intent.
Shaz needs to show intent with the ball in hand, and intent in a contest if he wants to sustain an AFL career. For a bloke with a reputation as an aerial interceptor, I've yet to see him hit a pack in the air to either spoil or mark or fight for a ground ball and I'm yet to see him attempt to take the game on with ball in hand.
True but we know what we get with Smith and he is capable.1st year draftees would be cheaper.
The jokeNo way GC win that trade. Three borderline best 22 players are not worth Lynch. If we could get that deal done I would be staggered.
if smith is on the list next year we are going nowhere.
1st year draftees would be cheaper.
Why is that? I think he's a very good value player.
Smith is actually a good player, don't understand the animus at all.
As Kohli would say - intent.
Shaz needs to show intent with the ball in hand, and intent in a contest if he wants to sustain an AFL career. For a bloke with a reputation as an aerial interceptor, I've yet to see him hit a pack in the air to either spoil or mark or fight for a ground ball and I'm yet to see him attempt to take the game on with ball in hand.
No animus at all O S "most" just disagree with the bolded above.
He has played 14 career games.
Averaged highest rebound 50's at the club last year and by the look of the last four games that's what his job is. Should finish comfortably top 5 in AFL next year for rebound 50's if he can play 20 games.
Not good value? Chris Mayne is 'not good value' at 500k per year. Josh Smith at 200-250k is good value in my book.
We should aspire for better than "good value" mate.
The bloke is average and that is being generous. I know all teams need them but he got dropped last year for a good reason.
P.S Not sure why Chris Mayne has to be mentioned on here at least once a day.
I'll take a piece of that action. Shall we say a pineapple?
Every team needs good dependable players who don't cost a bomb. I value his contribution higher than a lot on here it seems.
You can't pick up new players on the cheap each year and expect them to know the game plan straight away. He's solid and dependable and I'm sure on a sensible wage.
Problem is that his foot skills meant he was not actually dependable, you never knew what would happen next. I have some hope for him in the forward line and think keeping him for 2018 was the right decision.