Alot of people seem to be calling the Test as the best ever but I think they
a) havent seen that much cricket
b) what they have seen has been boring-boring-England
For people who watch Australia play this was just another game. What was so good about it?
Was Australia ever really on top in the match?
Why was this game better than the one England won in Melbourne in 1998? There England defended 175 in the fourth innings with Australia 3/130 at one stage before being bowled out for 162.
For mind - the two Tied Tests and the three Tests where sides won where following on would have to be better.
a) havent seen that much cricket
b) what they have seen has been boring-boring-England
For people who watch Australia play this was just another game. What was so good about it?
Was Australia ever really on top in the match?
Why was this game better than the one England won in Melbourne in 1998? There England defended 175 in the fourth innings with Australia 3/130 at one stage before being bowled out for 162.
For mind - the two Tied Tests and the three Tests where sides won where following on would have to be better.






