DarkPhoenix
Cont-Roo-Versial
- May 26, 2009
- 44,913
- 68,377
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- ManCity, Cardinals, Avalanche
SHORT! Is there anything he can't do?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Can't be worse than mills surely?Because he bowls pump?
Can't be worse than mills surely?
Unlucky.
Nah, that's one good rule across all forms of cricket, don't be bowling beamers.
Discretion leads to grey areas. The rule is perfect as is. Don’t be a gimp who bowls 2 beamers and you’ll be fine.They aren't bowling beamers cos they screw up a 150 km/h yorker though, and they certainly aren't doing it deliberately. They're doing it attempting a change of pace, which is one of the few weapons a bowler has in T20.
I wouldn't mind giving the umps a bit of discretion here. The intent of the rule is to stop dangerous bowling - so it'd be a pretty easy rule change if a bowler is taken out of the attack for 2 "dangerous" deliveries, rather than just 2 full tosses above waist height.
It's not a big bug bear I guess, it doesn't happen that often. And I'm only proposing that you'd change it for T20 games, where at most it's only affecting 4 overs.
If he held his ground the umpire would have given it not out. No way the camera shows Short touching the ball.
Why he walked god only knows.