Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Ever since Gilly, the world has had an obsession with keepers who are batsmen first and keepers second. I maintain that they cost the side more in drops than they gain in runs, especially in longer formats. Jimmy Peirson is Australia's best keeper, and should be playing. Inglis also keeps better than Carey. None of them are close to Ian Healy, Darren Berry, or pre-finger-injury Tim Paine.Two catches dropped by Carey already.
It's obviously harder to get out of the side than in.
We had Peter Nevil in that role for a while, but I think he lost his spot to Wade (or Paine ?)Ever since Gilly, the world has had an obsession with keepers who are batsmen first and keepers second. I maintain that they cost the side more in drops than they gain in runs, especially in longer formats. Jimmy Peirson is Australia's best keeper, and should be playing. Inglis also keeps better than Carey. None of them are close to Ian Healy, Darren Berry, or pre-finger-injury Tim Paine.
Peter Nevill wasn't treated well. He averaged just under 40 with the bat in first-class cricket, but in tests he often found himself at the wicket after a collapse and needing to either dig in at a strike rate of 25, or hit out before the tail self-destructed. Hardly ever got to play his natural game, and his performance suffered. Kept well throughout his tenure.We had Peter Nevil in that role for a while, but I think he lost his spot to Wade (or Paine ?)
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Did I say best bat? I meant bowler.What is Australia's obsession with sticking their best short form bat as far down the order as possible? Batting 7 today ffs.
Reckon there's a bit in this deck.This target should be a dawdle with a lineup deep enough to have Cam Green batting at 8… even if one of the openers is about the 8th or 9th best batsman in the side.
Will need all 11 batters at this stageThis target should be a dawdle with a lineup deep enough to have Cam Green batting at 8… even if one of the openers is about the 8th or 9th best batsman in the side.
Still can't figure out how Stoinis gets an automatic gigOur batting line-up is deplorable in this format.
For me he's quite clearly a T20 specialist, which is totally fine.Still can't figure out how Stoinis gets an automatic gig
52 games
1 century
6 fifties
30 average
93 s/r
Massively over rated
Particularly if he's a batting all-rounderStill can't figure out how Stoinis gets an automatic gig
52 games
1 century
6 fifties
30 average
93 s/r
Massively over rated
Finch is almost 36 years old. At some point people have to stop saying “he’ll come good” and accept that his reflexes have degraded a bit and he’s too vulnerable to elite fast bowlers, who he would be facing all the time as an opener.
Peter Nevill wasn't treated well. He averaged just under 40 with the bat in first-class cricket, but in tests he often found himself at the wicket after a collapse and needing to either dig in at a strike rate of 25, or hit out before the tail self-destructed. Hardly ever got to play his natural game, and his performance suffered. Kept well throughout his tenure.
It's the Tubby Taylor conundrum, valued too high as captain despite s**t form
That's right, they wanted someone "with a bit of mongrel". Enter Wade. Who stunk it up behind the stumps and couldn't score a run. Awesome choice.Literally got dropped because he wasn't chatty enough behind the stumps for Smith's liking.
Is he so highly valued? This is ODI cricket, which is to Test cricket what checkers is to chess. You don't need to be mensa level genius. They'll be fine without him.It's the Tubby Taylor conundrum, valued too high as captain despite s**t form
Hey man, I'm not talking us up. Or pumping up Cam Green as he approaches a ton!Sakes, Dazz is posting in here. Bye bye Aussie hopes![]()
I don't think Tubbs or Tugga had a run as bad as this.It's the Tubby Taylor conundrum, valued too high as captain despite s**t form