That's the real reason that they got rid of him there is an El Ninio on the way and we are in for a hot spell that BS would not be able to cope withThis is what sticks in my mind as a supporter. And he went on all week about it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
That's the real reason that they got rid of him there is an El Ninio on the way and we are in for a hot spell that BS would not be able to cope withThis is what sticks in my mind as a supporter. And he went on all week about it!
Ken is a football person and loves club land not the corporate world of the tingles franchise. wont happen.Would there be a civil war in Adelaide if the crows put a god father offer to Ken , and he accepted ?
Ken is a football person and loves club land not the corporate world of the tingles franchise. wont happen.Would there be a civil war in Adelaide if the crows put a god father offer to Ken , and he accepted ?
You are completely missing the point.
It's not Emma Quayle's responsibility to write an article about every bit of news that occurs at the Adelaide Football Club. She would actually be assigned to stories the vast majority of the time, because otherwise the News and Fairfax AFL sections would probably contain a dozen stories, by a dozen different writers about exactly the same piece of news each day. She is not generally a 'newsbreaker'; she is a feature writer, by-and-large. Hence, it is absurd for you to act like it is some black mark against her credibility as a journalist, not because she reported about something and got it wrong, but because she didn't write about it at all. Please tell me you understand how ridiculous that argument is.
It is Emma Quayle's responsibility to report on news regarding the AFL and produce factual and informative work. As far as I know, she has an exceptional track record of doing exactly that. She has written a story about Goodwin going to Melbourne and phone conversations between Goodwin and Ricciuto over the past two days, backed up by quotes from Goodwin. Do you understand that, as a journalist, it's not about what you don't write, but about what you do write?
And again...I am seldom mentioning the recently sacked coach here. Perhaps try playing the ball, rather than the 'team supported'.
he definitely went overboard with it, raised a lot of eyebrows, was a sign that the pressure of the job was getting to him for mine
Mate you're the one who brought EQ into this, I don't really know why.
If you don't think Roo and Goody have talked about this before the last week, remembering that they are very close, best mates and business partners...then I don't know what to say.
Goody has been going to Melbourne for weeks. Together they may have just bumped up his value a touch.
As well as giving us a convenient cover story that we're not into anyone and are starting our search from scratch. You don't have to take my word for it that thats not the case, just wait and see.
Danger interviewing Clarko for the coaching job...Yep. But wasn't too sure about the Alistair Clarkson bit. F off Clarkson.
Because she wrote a story about how Goodwin and Ricciuto spoke last night and this morning about Goodwin's coaching future. I would have thought that was quite obvious. People can choose to either dismiss Quayle's credibility, or accept her article as accurate. I know which one I'm going for.
Brendon Santerson?Pretty shocked for Brendon. Thought he was doing alright at the Crows.
Wouldn't mind getting Santerson down at the Pies
Brendon Santerson?
Look from over there using EQ as your main source and not hearing Roo and the rest of the club in recent times I understand why you are confused.
Best mates. Business partners. Just apply some logic and think for yourself for 10 seconds about that relationship. If Roo wanted Goody he would have had him locked away long before today.
One word. Smokescreen. On this occasion EQ is being played. If you believe we were after Goody as head coach and he slipped through our fingers then you are being played as well. But whatever helps you sleep at night.
Danger interviewing Clarko for the coaching job...
He actually also said he's a good coach in many ways, but its a complex job and he wasnt up to scratch in key areas. Paraphrased.I found it ironic that when Roo was asked on radio was Sando a bad coach, he responded, "Well he's been sacked hasn't he?" (or something to that effect). The irony of the statement is that probably 90% of senior coaches get sacked at some point. Very few leave of their own accord with a pat on the back. So in effect, he's calling most of the Senior Coaches in the history of the AFL bad coaches by that comment.
Culture of Adelaide bigwigs has got to be the worst in the league. Badmouthing a sacked coach is pathetic.
Some serious issues down there are the crows, the culture is very much diseased.
100% confirmed rabble.
He was just waiting for a mate.Yep. But wasn't too sure about the Alistair Clarkson bit. F off Clarkson.
He actually also said he's a good coach in many ways, but its a complex job and he wasnt up to scratch in key areas. Paraphrased.
But nice hyberbole
he actually also said that.... after he said the part Blakey quoted? I don't see any hyperbole used..
anyway... the chairman says they need a Premiership coach... where the hell will they get one of them at this hour?!
might be time to give Brett Ratten a call! what about Matthew Knights?
He did answer the question by stating that Sando was sacked implying that he was a bad coach.He actually also said he's a good coach in many ways, but its a complex job and he wasnt up to scratch in key areas. Paraphrased.
But nice hyberbole
Santasanto?