Remove this Banner Ad

Buddy's Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter hawker92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

hawker92

Cancelled
Joined
Apr 11, 2008
Posts
1,095
Reaction score
651
Location
Victoria
AFL Club
Hawthorn
I've heard this term mentioned a couple of times throughout this forum, and I have no idea what it is/was.

Can someone enlighten?
 
A four man forward line in a square formation, played mainly in 2007.

Buddy, Roughead, Boyle and I think Dixon were the key forwards.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It's an outdated idea where the thought process was that if you bombed it in long to a tall forward setup enough times, you could kick a winning score.

Nowadays such thinking is considered backwards and old school. The better approach is to have your forwards roaming around anywhere but the forward 50 so to confuse the defenders. It's called "Clarko's Desert".
 
It's an outdated idea where the thought process was that if you bombed it in long to a tall forward setup enough times, you could kick a winning score.

Nowadays such thinking is considered backwards and old school. The better approach is to have your forwards roaming around anywhere but the forward 50 so to confuse the defenders. It's called "Clarko's Desert".[/quote]


absolute ripper:thumbsu:
 
It's an outdated idea where the thought process was that if you bombed it in long to a tall forward setup enough times, you could kick a winning score.

Nowadays such thinking is considered backwards and old school. The better approach is to have your forwards roaming around anywhere but the forward 50 so to confuse the defenders. It's called "Clarko's Desert".

Roughy or Buddy?

desert-bones.jpg
 
Ok cheers guys. I agree with the comments about clarkson... He needs to get an effective forward structure worked out. I'd like to see buddy stationed in the square, and leading out. There's hardly a defender that can spoil buddy running fullspeed with arms outstretched.
 
As others said four points. The key issue was that the four stood far enough apart that no defender could get from his direct opponent to another contest.

Imagine a 'standard' 6 man forward-line, and then take out the FF and CHF. That's pretty much it.

The half-forwards would block for their leading teammates, and lots of inter-woven leads were run (usually involving Williams) getting them uncontested marks on the lead.

Players would swap around, but the basic premise was to force opponents into 1-on-1 contests deep in our forward line.

It fell down because it required a huge running workload from our midfielders, which couldn't be maintained for the whole game - and turnovers resulted in fast-break rebounds.
 
Tis okay, just a rather grim metaphor of our two forwards ossifying somewhere up forward.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

So whose responsibility is it? I know Clarkson is senior coach, but Leon Cameron is the forward coach... Obviously Clarkson has final say, but Cameron should be the one tweaking and refining.

Maybe we could have Pagan's Paddock for Buddy ;)

let me take this opportunity to apologise to Mr. Barker. He was the fall guy last year.
 
It fell down because it required a huge running workload from our midfielders, which couldn't be maintained for the whole game - and turnovers resulted in fast-break rebounds.

Sounds like our current gameplan. Certainly more coast to coast goals this year than in 2007/2008.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top