- Jun 28, 2013
- 33,617
- 52,634
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Clarko likes and respects Cogs loyalty
But I don’t
But I don’t
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Carlton’s plan is being shit foreverQuality FA’s were a big part of the plan.
Missing on Coniglio obviously really hurts.
View attachment 735635
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Coniglio was really a smokescreen for their far bigger targets like Patton and Armitage.
Patton is 100% going. You're stuck with himSeeing you’re posting history you really are obsessed with Hawthorn makes me think you’re around 15 years old.
Hawthorn don’t have to take Patton. GWS can keep him.
Patton is 100% going. You're stuck with him
Patton will be at the Hawks don't be delusionalNo, wrong. Hawthorn don’t have to trade for him at all if they don’t want to. GWS are now struck paying his salary.
Nah. Plenty of Carlton supporters have been lippy about what other clubs need to do.
Presumably from experience. Experts in doing it all wrong over and over.
Carlton’s plan is being s**t forever
View attachment 735635
Patton will be at the Hawks don't be delusional
The deal has been done for months it is happening. Don't be salty at not getting Conigs you will get Patton cheaply but pay his salary as well. Not sure what the issue is he is a good player when fitDon’t need him. The emergence of Lewis, O’Brien playing well doesn’t make Patton a priority. If the Hawks really wanted a key forward they can draft one with pick 11.
Of course they don't have to trade for him. No one ever suggested they had to do it.No, wrong. Hawthorn don’t have to trade for him at all if they don’t want to. GWS are now struck paying his salary.
3-4 million?Seeing you’re posting history you really are obsessed with Hawthorn. Which makes sense actually given West Coast have been thumped twice in Grand Finals by the Hawks.
Hawthorn don’t have to take Patton at all. He is contracted. GWS can keep him.
The Hawks have 3-4 million dollars in cap space to spend.



3-4 million?![]()
Because it's hilariously unrealistic.Why’s that hard to believe?
Because it's hilariously unrealistic.
Interesting isnt it.Because it's hilariously unrealistic.
He's taken the Cogs news poorly is my take.Interesting isnt it.
Oh so you didn't mean the Hawks have a war chest. They have allocated money to sign 25 players.If a team loses three top 10 highest paid players in one off-season, plus having over 30% of the list being out of contract it is possible to have a decent amount of cap space you know.

The deal has been done for months it is happening. Don't be salty at not getting Conigs you will get Patton cheaply but pay his salary as well. Not sure what the issue is he is a good player when fit
I don't know the ins and outs of hawks cap, but hardly find it surprising we might have an abundance available.He's taken the Cogs news poorly is my take.
He's taken the Cogs news poorly is my take.

You think Hawthorn don't have 3rd party deals in place? As I said earlier Poppy was a multicultural ambassador for a couple of years.More money for the new Hawthorn multicultural ambassador James Sicily. Hawthorn may have to lobby the AFL for 3rd party deals like some other clubs.![]()