Don't rule us out of trading in for Williams or Reid in the 25-50 range.
What in your opinion would be the deal to get us the picks in that range.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Don't rule us out of trading in for Williams or Reid in the 25-50 range.
I've outlined a series of hypothetical delistings and deals after trading down from pick 1 to ultimately wind up selecting at (before you factor in how bids affect pick numbers) 3, 5, 23, 29, 31, 50 & 65, then taking BSOS late.What in your opinion would be the deal to get us the picks in that range.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Isn't the point of trading a future first to get another go in this draft to get talent in a year earlier to speed up development? If development is hampered by getting a game, what's the point?Not sure about that. It's a big decision with the future of the club firmly in mind.
You don't need to fit them all in on game day.
You create an environment where depth equals competition for spots, which can only be a good thing.
We've done it out of necessity in recent years, but there's no need for every draftee to be playing senior football each and every week.
And why is that a bad thing?
Players develop at different rates regardless of which level they play at.
Isn't the point of trading a future first to get another go in this draft to get talent in a year earlier to speed up development? If development is hampered by getting a game, what's the point?
Unless we have a specific target that we rate highly, I don't see the value in trading next year's first without something coming back.
Never in the history of BF has so much been written by so many with so little said.There's not much else to talk about.
Trying to guess who we'll take with picks in the 70's is both difficult and not very interesting.
Same with the rookie draft.
Boys have only just started training again, so it'll be a while before we get some interesting track reports.
Captaincy has been locked down.
Coaches are all in place.
So given keeping Pick 1 = taking Sam Walsh, tradye hypotheticals to move down the order and add some more picks is about all we've got as far as more expansive footy talk goes.
See. I just spent 5 minutes crafting an elaborate post detailing how little there is to talk about. This is what we've been reduced to.
Very Churchillian.Never in the history of BF has so much been written by so many with so little said.
Might take the sting out of itMight need to send an SOS...
I would have been happy to keep mcAdamWe are lucky the AFL didn’t announce this earlier.
If Geelong and Adelaide knew this was an option it would have been a bad outcome for us.
Watched that movie in my English class.No long story short the avatar is Dennis Hopper as a character named Feck in a great lil depressing indie movie from the 90's called Rivers Edge. Thought his name was Fet for a long time, so stuck with it. Dennis was great in that film. RIP. So no its nothing to do with Boba
You must've had one of those hip cool English teachers. Hope he/she didn't make you analyze the crap out of it and ruin it
You must've had one of those hip cool English teachers. Hope he/she didn't make you analyze the crap out of it and ruin it
This is a direct result of all those keen on trading to get McGovern. He was never what I wanted so will have to trust why coach Bolton and the recruiting team supported Bolts get him. However we got plenty of shiny new toys from draft in last three years so I will be pretty content getting Walsh, Ben Silvagni and some project youngster with late pick. Walsh should just about round out all the class we need for midfield for next decade. Up to coaching and developing staff now to have them reach their potential collectively as we go through next decade. McGovern needs to compliment everything else they been working on to make full sense in time.Although happy with trading period picks, i am slightly concerned we are seemingly only going into this strong draft with only 2 live picks (obviously Ben Silvagni will be chosen as a F/S pick)
Obviously SOS and the recruiting staff felt the need to bring mature/bigger bodies and experienced players to the club (and i agree) but i just wish we could pluck another 2nd and 3rd rounder from somewhere with live trading on draft night.
Copied over from the no discussion thread.
Would love to know who Matt is talking about here.
Looking at the Vic Country list there are a whole lot of names who have been mentioned late in mock drafts.
Will Hamill
Laitham Vandermeer
Zac Foot
Tom Berry
Mitchell Riordan
Sam Fletcher
Matthew McGannon
Charlie Sprague
Hudson Garoni
Riley Bowman
Connor Idun
Thoughts Arr0w ?
Sam Fletcher, I have huge confidence in him. Vandermeer interests me too, not sure he’ll be there for our late picks.Copied over from the no discussion thread.
Would love to know who Matt is talking about here.
Looking at the Vic Country list there are a whole lot of names who have been mentioned late in mock drafts.
Will Hamill
Laitham Vandermeer
Zac Foot
Tom Berry
Mitchell Riordan
Sam Fletcher
Matthew McGannon
Charlie Sprague
Hudson Garoni
Riley Bowman
Connor Idun
Thoughts Arr0w ?
Don't rule us out of trading in for Williams or Reid in the 25-50 range.
Brayden Ham?All of those guys have merit, late in the draft. If it was me, Vandermeer is the one
Reckon there’s a fair chance geelong scoop him up.Brayden Ham?
Brayden Ham?
Jimmae had him at pick 84 in the Phantom Draft ahead of Vandemeer, so maybe gettable...either way, looks like there may be some good options with our late picksAnother good option