I reckon JOM comes in this week, but not for Sharp.If Freo can get hold of the midfield and clearances and cut supply to Darcy, Naughton etc then they can win.
Would be happy with only one change this week = JOM for Sharp
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I reckon JOM comes in this week, but not for Sharp.If Freo can get hold of the midfield and clearances and cut supply to Darcy, Naughton etc then they can win.
Would be happy with only one change this week = JOM for Sharp
Weitering is 195cm, Darcy is 208cm. 13cm + extra arm length is a massive reach advantage.
Disappointing that Sharp is still somehow an automatic lock in this team.JL said if Sharp is fit, he plays. Only question mark is on his fitness, with sore shins
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Also that he never considered Young as a midfielder until Joel Corey spoke up. I had assumed that Young was midfield bound when he was drafted.Griffin Logue had to play forward because we had too many key backs. It's unfair to criticise JL for not playing lobb back. If there's a criticism of JLs lack of imagination in his use of players it should be the lack of creativity with Jackson.
Please tell me I heard it wrong when JL said Cox might be the matchup on Darcy when he plays deeper
He didn't do alot right either? The one memory I have of his game is when he put a fairly regulation snap for a left footer out on the full.
Awful choice for sub. Not someone who will have a good impact coming onfeel like Worner will be sub
feel like Worner will be sub
Surprised they think Worner or an injured Sharp offers more is all.Aish is getting dropped because he was only a very late inclusion, he wouldn't have been in last week if everything went to plan
Why are we surprised?
It’s truly mystifying to me .its not like we’re flush with good options- worner anyone???What did Aish do man come on
It’s truly mystifying to me .its not like we’re flush with good options- worner anyone???
What did Aish do man come on
Gotta be a Conca situation surely.yeh man, something is going on.
But we’ve used Aish as a wing/through the midfield before. Doesn’t need to be a defender. Would be good for sub if nothing elseWe dropped him for Wagner about two thirds of the way through last year. Aish is a dependable defender but is not good at transitioning the ball.
We’re already pretty stodgy of the HB line and Aish increases that whilst Wagner doesn’t.
As for why Worner is preferred I don’t really know. But Worner used the ball about as well as Ryan and Chapman and sat in the hole a bit against the Eagles. So I’m not sure his game was really as bad as we all think. Seems to be a bit of trend around here that once you’re a whipping boy, nothing you do is right