Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes vs. Brisbane

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Surely Ken's realised that the Trengove experiment hasn't worked. He's given Jackson enough chances to prove himself as a forward.

Time to bring in Dougall. That move also helps to fix another problem. I was at the game on Saturday, and you could see that the defence lacked height. At times Jonas manned-up against Daniher, who's 13 cm taller. Jonas can keep tall forwards quiet. He did a great job on Tom Lynch in Shanghai but it's a tough ask when an opposition player has a big height advantage. Clurey is more suited to playing against the second line talls, and Hombsch isn't up to the job. Trengove is the obvious answer.
 
i dont think he has ken will back his players to the bitter end and that bitter end will be his job. Its a noobrainer to bring howard in send jacko back but he wont that would be admitting he got it wrong
 
i dont think he has ken will back his players to the bitter end and that bitter end will be his job. Its a noobrainer to bring howard in send jacko back but he wont that would be admitting he got it wrong

I don't believe it would be an admission that he got it wrong at all, it was born of necessity because we were too small up forward last year and Dougal was coming off a knee reco and not expected to return until midway through the year.

However his actions have proven that Jackson will not play back at any time while there is no replacement. It is subjective whether or not Eddy was a suitable replacement. Regardless, Dougal is that man and is definitely ready, so there is no reason to play Jackson up forward any longer.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I would 'rest' him for turning his back on the play to appeal for a free whilst the Essendon player waltzed the ball from our full forward line.

That was infuriating. Not sure if it really was the case but it did look as though gray could have run on to the ball and kicked a goal.
 
I don't believe it would be an admission that he got it wrong at all, it was born of necessity because we were too small up forward last year and Dougal was coming off a knee reco and not expected to return until midway through the year.

However his actions have proven that Jackson will not play back at any time while there is no replacement. It is subjective whether or not Eddy was a suitable replacement. Regardless, Dougal is that man and is definitely ready, so there is no reason to play Jackson up forward any longer.

It's only subjective because he hasn't been given a chance.
 
Doogs in will seriously challenge our structures as Jacko must go back and one of Clurey, Jonas or Hombsch has to go out. We simply can't have 4 tall plodding defenders.

That isn't how I see it. Trengove goes to defence, all three stay in but Jonas takes a small to medium sized forward. Toumpas comes out and Hartlett to a wing.
 
2014 was our best year since we won the flag and we had 4 'tall plodding defenders' that season. Clurey is more athletic than Carlile if anything.

Hombsch and Jonas are both at their best when they're not forced to play a KPD role. Jonas is at his best on mid-size opponents and Hombsch is at his best as a loose man.
 
Logan Austin's name doesn't seem to be coming up despite playing well. How we fit him in I don't know but I feel he would add something to our back 6.

I think Logan is a 200 game afl player for us. 197cms and has decent to very good foot skills. Having said that I don't think hen needs to be rushed in right now.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The hard part is what to do with Jacko when Dougal comes into the team?

You cant move Jacko back to defence as none of Hombsch, Clurey and Jonas deserve to be dropped. You cant have another tall in the backline as it will be too top heavy.

You line up Jacko, Jonas, Hombsch and Clurey (and I'd Austin to the list too) and work out which three provide the most balanced line up and then pick those three. This is professional, elite level sport we are talking about here, sometimes good, in-form players will be left out of the team, particularly when we have so few injuries.
 
That isn't how I see it. Trengove goes to defence, all three stay in but Jonas takes a small to medium sized forward. Toumpas comes out and Hartlett to a wing.

But they have been vocal about Hartlett not having the tank to play on the Wing.

This is a good problem to have, with good players coming up, but Port Adelaide coaches will stuff it up, they won't make the hard decision.
 
Surely Ken's realised that the Trengove experiment hasn't worked. He's given Jackson enough chances to prove himself as a forward.

Time to bring in Dougall. That move also helps to fix another problem. I was at the game on Saturday, and you could see that the defence lacked height. At times Jonas manned-up against Daniher, who's 13 cm taller. Jonas can keep tall forwards quiet. He did a great job on Tom Lynch in Shanghai but it's a tough ask when an opposition player has a big height advantage. Clurey is more suited to playing against the second line talls, and Hombsch isn't up to the job. Trengove is the obvious answer.
Well perhaps he was waiting until Dougie was fully ready. Fingers crossed for this week's selections.
 
You line up Jacko, Jonas, Hombsch and Clurey (and I'd Austin to the list too) and work out which three provide the most balanced line up and then pick those three. This is professional, elite level sport we are talking about here, sometimes good, in-form players will be left out of the team, particularly when we have so few injuries.

Exactly. It seems as though Ken has picked his best 22 players and then tried to shoe-horn them into a team. Do we need Pittard, Hartlett, Broadbent and Toumpas all playing half-back flank? Choose 2, maybe 3. Do we need 3 medium-sized defenders playing tall? Why not 1 tall and 2 medium? Or 2 tall and 1 medium? Why do we have 4 midfielders (R Gray, S Gray, Boak and Ah Chee) all playing in the forward line? Only Robbie Gray should be considered a specialist forward.

Would love to see some balance in the team, even if that means dropping some of Kens best 22.
 
What it should be:

Out: Toumpas, Hartlett, S.Gray, Ah Chee

In: Monfries, Houston, Eddy, Atley

What it will be:

Out: Toumpas
In: Young
Or just as likely:

Out:
Dixon
Ryder
Ebert

In:
Lobbe
Neade
Young

With Toumpas announced as the skipper for the rest of the season.
 
It's all about structure

Hartlett or Broadbent has to go. DBJ also hasn't been below his standard.

Houston plays as an interceptor which is a Hombsch and Jonas role, but I'd love to see him back for Hamish.

Broadbent must be on notice too.

Sam Gray has to be chopped he just isn't strong enough and crumbles under pressure

I'd love Westhoff to go I'm sure people don't need to hear my reasons why again

Toumpas too

Atley, Dougal, Houston in
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

2014 was our best year since we won the flag and we had 4 'tall plodding defenders' that season. Clurey is more athletic than Carlile if anything.

We had Trengove, Jonas, Hombsch, Carlile and Oshea in the backline through the finals in 2014.
 
But they have been vocal about Hartlett not having the tank to play on the Wing.

This is a good problem to have, with good players coming up, but Port Adelaide coaches will stuff it up, they won't make the hard decision.


They've been vocal about him not having the tank to play in the guts. Guts v Wing are two very different beasts. He pretty much played more of a wingman's role against Hawthorn, providing link play, dropping back into defence for the intercept and provide rebound, and drifting forward going inside 50. Was his best game of the year. Hartlett isn't a defender, so don't play him there.
 
It's all about structure

Hartlett or Broadbent has to go. DBJ also hasn't been below his standard.

Houston plays as an interceptor which is a Hombsch and Jonas role, but I'd love to see him back for Hamish.

Broadbent must be on notice too.

Sam Gray has to be chopped he just isn't strong enough and crumbles under pressure

I'd love Westhoff to go I'm sure people don't need to hear my reasons why again

Toumpas too

Atley, Dougal, Houston in

In a perfect world we'd see those changes but the one thing Ken's been consistent about in his coaching over the last five years is that he's not willing to make the tough calls
 
They've been vocal about him not having the tank to play in the guts. Guts v Wing are two very different beasts. He pretty much played more of a wingman's role against Hawthorn, providing link play, dropping back into defence for the intercept and provide rebound, and drifting forward going inside 50. Was his best game of the year. Hartlett isn't a defender, so don't play him there.

When are we allowed to say that Hartlett hasn't lived up to expectations?

He isn't a defender, I agree with you.
 
Im not questioning Hartletts obvious lack of tank to play... I am questioning his heart!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom