Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Geelong v Gold Coast - Rd 14 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 78% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
In: Brett Ebert, Simon Phillips, Josh Mahoney, Che Cockatoo Collins, Daniel Motlop, Marlon Motlop, Wade Thompson, Cameron Hitchcock.
Ken's reaction:
![]()
What's incredible is how some posters will pull out literally any excuse under the sun in order to support the unsupportable.
I thought I'd seen it all with some of the mental gymnastics people engaged in to find a reason for Butcher not to come in, or Eddy to be dropped, but this shit with Neade takes the absolute cake.
Literally, some of you, Ken Hinkley could come to your work and take a massive dump on your desk, and you'd be all 'yeah I can see the logic behind that, good decision, good energy, good footy boys.'
God I love it when we pick a small, low ceiling small forward instead of a developing tall deserving of selection when we play Brisbane at home.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Che would be too tall
God I love it when we pick a small, low ceiling small forward instead of a developing tall deserving of selection when we play Brisbane at home.
'You know when ya gotta go ya gotta go, and to be honest, I reckon he done really well to do it on the desk. It would have made a mess on the carpet. At least this way we don't have to worry about cleaning the floor, it will be much easier to get it off the table.'
All issues of form and development aside. I can't believe we're playing Sam Gray, Jake Neade and Jarman Impey in the same week. Such a terribly unbalanced side.
181 cm, 7cm shorter than Aaron Young. Still, he'll play as the ruckman no doubt.
POTW"I watched the replay, and the poo wasn't as bad as you're all suggesting. Some of the runny bits on the corner were some of his best work so far, and the smell was actually pleasant. Too many desk-poo haters on this board, criticizing the poo he did on the desk while ignoring the poo he did on the couch and the other poo he did on the bed."
I understand the whole team defense concept. Yes, forwards should defend a bit as well. But shouldn't we expect defenders to contribute by kicking a few goals as well? Or team attack is not a thing yet?
This obsession with forwards' defense efforts really irritates me. I mean, it should be part of their toolkit, but can't be the defining KPI. I know it sounds terribly passé but I'd be happy for our forwards to kick goals first and foremost.
Perfect time to bring in a drew or atley, or even howard.
Very happy with Houston in. Hope its the last he sees of the sanfl
Dear god this is so true.Which particular criticism do you feel is unfair?
-His lack of goal scoring ?
- his horrible kicking to targets inside 50?
- his decision making?
- his inability to be a marking target or even compete in the air?
- His low possesion winning ability?
The criticisms of Neade are not even remotely remotely unfair. They are justified. What's unfair is the mythical label he gets as a good defensive player when time after time his direct opponent has far more impact on the game than he does , in the air , on the ground , in link up play running off him etc. this mythical account of Neade as some sort of defensive pressure guru in the forward half is hogswash if you ask me. His 3 tackles a game while ok hardly have an impact , his chases while having the rare impact never turn games much less make up for the onslaught his opponent has given us with his barrage of easy possessions running off jake Neade to help another player in a contest.
No player has ever lined up on jake Neade and put any thought what so ever into how they will stop him. No team has ever looked at the team sheet and thought how are we going to help his defender cover Neade. Neades opponent every game ever in the afl has planned how he is going to help cover our other forwards , and how he will hurt us going the other way and that player has probably been more successful than not in achieving that.
