Remove this Banner Ad

Prediction Changes vs. Brisbane

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

lol leave Janus alone farken. He's alright and at least tries to justify his opinions. Eccentric, but he never bad mouths any other posters which is better than me, and many others.
 
NO HAHA I AM REAL BIGFOOTBALL FAN.

I REALLY LIKE THE WAY MR HINKLEY THINKS! MR HINKLEY, MR THOMAS, AND MR KOCH AND THE 'WE ARE PORT ADELAIDE (TM)' FAMILY ARE ALL VERY SMART AND REASONABLE. WE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR WITH EAST ASIA JAKE NEADE IS AN EXCELLENT THIRD TALL OPTION UP FORWARD, AND JACKSON TRENGOVE IS CLEARLY IN AA FORM UP FORWARD. DOUGAL HOWARD WILL START TO PUSH FOR SELECTION WITH JUST 6 OR 7 MORE CONSECUTIVE 8 GOAL GAMES I'M SURE. GOOD WORK PORT ADELAIDE FOOTBALL CLUB!

SIGNED
DAVID KOCH
JANUS

DRAZAH
Brilliant. Most Won't get it.

Neade in as a forward for his defensive strength.

Your rations have been increased from 15 units a day to 10 units per day


Signed. Emmanuel Goldstein
 
This is back to the old Janus.

I prefer the new Janus. I only agree with about 5% of this

What would you like me to do? Rant and rave about how I've lost faith in the side, that Ken has no idea, that we should be playing Howard?

If Ken wants to back in his system, there's nothing I can do about it. I'm glad he's got rid of Ah Chee and dumped Toumpas and put in another high forward, because that means Boak can spend more time in the midfield.

The system is good. The players are wrong, but we can't play the right players yet, because they are either in the final stages of recovery from an ACL (Howard) or out injured (Monfries). So we make do with what we have.
 
lol leave Janus alone farken. He's alright and at least tries to justify his opinions. Eccentric, but he never bad mouths any other posters which is better than me, and many others.

I spend more time arguing with Janus than any other poster on this site but I still respect him as a poster. I'll respect anybody who actually makes an effort to justify their arguments, even if I don't agree with them.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I spend more time arguing with Janus than any other poster on this site but I still respect him as a poster. I'll respect anybody who actually makes an effort to justify their arguments, even if I don't agree with them.

**** you, campaigner.
 
What would you like me to do? Rant and rave about how I've lost faith in the side, that Ken has no idea, that we should be playing Howard?

If Ken wants to back in his system, there's nothing I can do about it. I'm glad he's got rid of Ah Chee and dumped Toumpas and put in another high forward, because that means Boak can spend more time in the midfield.

The system is good. The players are wrong, but we can't play the right players yet, because they are either in the final stages of recovery from an ACL (Howard) or out injured (Monfries). So we make do with what we have.
I just don't follow your consistency. Sometimes your posts are good (as in I agree with them or find it deeper thinking to consider) but it's like the power from port sometimes, you decide that whatever Ken decided was right so you change your views to support or justify him. Something like that anyway. I just thought maybe 3 months ago you saw the light and accepted his tactics were made up as he went along, always reactive after the horse has bolted, and we're noting that he actually had no substance. It seems now you're back on the Ken wagon and well, there's no way to justify not playing Howard or selecting Neade, but your back on the hidden genius angle again.

What do I want you to do? Nothing. Whatever you want. The only thing I don't like about forums is people mocking others or saying someone isn't singing kumbaya in the acceptable key.

Please, keep on. The board is better for your posting and everyone's posting
 
If the argument is that Howard isn't fully fit yet

a) Is he playing reduced minutes in the SANFL or being managed in some other way?

b) Why did Ken say it was because he needed to further prove himself as a KPF first after being played down back?
 
Hi! Guys, one from the left fields, our coaches are holding back some of our "secret weapons" / talls / newbies for later to surprise & so oppositon wont work us out!! For now we just need to make the 8 (top 4 is still a real chance).

Hahahahahaha!!! That's the spirit... We lost to Essendon to trick everybody. Well, it worked on me!
 
Last edited:
I just don't follow your consistency. Sometimes your posts are good (as in I agree with them or find it deeper thinking to consider) but it's like the power from port sometimes, you decide that whatever Ken decided was right so you change your views to support or justify him. Something like that anyway. I just thought maybe 3 months ago you saw the light and accepted his tactics were made up as he went along, always reactive after the horse has bolted, and we're noting that he actually had no substance. It seems now you're back on the Ken wagon and well, there's no way to justify not playing Howard or selecting Neade, but your back on the hidden genius angle again.

What do I want you to do? Nothing. Whatever you want. The only thing I don't like about forums is people mocking others or saying someone isn't singing kumbaya in the acceptable key.

Please, keep on. The board is better for your posting and everyone's posting
Ha ha and I like your reliable posting too Boydy
When I want a drink any time of day I have this mate in Elizabeth that is ALWAYS up to it ( including warp 10 ACDC)

When I get the shits with the coaching , gameplans , selections etc I just know that I can find you in here saying it more brutal than I would

Sort of like a barometer

When you aint on here I think either you have been banned for going off

Or

The team is going well
 
As usual, I want Janus to be right and for there to be this great strategic plan that we're not privy to. But then Ken goes ahead and plays Toumpas 2 weeks in a row.
 
Is it possible that we can't play an Ately/Drew or any other 1st year medium/small AND SPP at the same time as none of them are fit enough at this stage of their careers to play decent game time in the AFL and it will kill our rotations? I think it could be a factor in the selections.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What would you like me to do? Rant and rave about how I've lost faith in the side, that Ken has no idea, that we should be playing Howard?

If Ken wants to back in his system, there's nothing I can do about it. I'm glad he's got rid of Ah Chee and dumped Toumpas and put in another high forward, because that means Boak can spend more time in the midfield.

The system is good. The players are wrong, but we can't play the right players yet, because they are either in the final stages of recovery from an ACL (Howard) or out injured (Monfries). So we make do with what we have.

If this was the grand plan then why didn't Monfries come in when he was fit and firing?
 
Just put Janus on ignore mate. I did ages ago and have been happier since. Good-for-nothing poster all around.
Shivers, you are the one missing out by putting Janus on ignore. At least he shows hope and tries to dissect what the coaches, in his opinion, are aiming for. I far kern love his posts.
 
Janus is by far the MVP on this board when everyone is melting.

Just please mate, don't post about how "North Melbourne/Essendon are really shit clubs and we will definitely beat them" before games.
 
Ha ha and I like your reliable posting too Boydy
When I want a drink any time of day I have this mate in Elizabeth that is ALWAYS up to it ( including warp 10 ACDC)

When I get the shits with the coaching , gameplans , selections etc I just know that I can find you in here saying it more brutal than I would

Sort of like a barometer

When you aint on here I think either you have been banned for going off

Or

The team is going well


Yeah well I prefer being the 'maniac than the 'moan too

It's all therapy anyway

I'm more interested in Heavy Metal, tbh
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

When has Jake Neade ever had a problem performing at junior/state level? It's what saw him drafted in the first place and rack up 51 games over 5 years at AFL level. 20 tackles against the Panthers and West? Yawn.

Consistently performing and holding his place in the senior side is what his critics have an issue with. What makes this time different? What evidence is there that he won't have the same deficiencies at the highest level?

When our forward line already contains Impey, Sam Gray and a half-rat Robbie Gray as smalls?

It's just more of the same, like the bizarre Toumpas story of the past fortnight.

He's not up to it, but he'll perform ok against the worst team in the league, hold his spot and then go MIA at the MCG the week after.

Then we'll drop him for, I don't know, Monfries(?) and we'll all marvel at how much we missed the veteran's guile, smarts and clutch gene.

Neade has been good at SANFL level this year and it's clear from the coaches that his work has been rated well. I think this year he's shown a better ability to stay involved throughout a game, and contrary to popular belief here his ball use is ok.

The main argument against his inclusion, as you've said as well, seems to be based on the preconceived idea he's unable to improve, and not going to consistently perform at the top level. So we've got a host of preemptive wailing and complaining based on an outcome yet to occur, without giving him an opportunity to take his chance.

The way I look at it is this;
1)Does his selection help correct our deficiencies against Essendon and hence help improve our structure? Yes
2)Historically, Neade has the highest winning percentage of any of our players >50 games, so his positive impact on our forward line (when playing well) is not a stretch.
3) Has he shown good SANFL form and has improved his ability to stay involved.
 
And now for something positive...

From the pressers this week, Ken has hinted at a forward line with Dixon, Howard and Marshall.

This year.



DISCLAIMER: I may be reading too much into his comments and this may or may not happen. Probably won't. Eh, whatevs.
Should have said Kenny rather than Ken.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom