Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously, have you ever concidered using your intellect and doing some research on the "other side" of the green burn argument?All answers in megawatts, please.
Don't engage with him, is the best advice i can give you. It's only science when he claims it is or when it supports his initial premise. I have had plenty of ping pongs with him and it always ended with "he is not a real neuroscientist" "his peer reviews are bullshit" , even when i am quoting one of the top neuroscientists around. And simply put why would a real scientist have 55k posts in a few years on a football forum? how many posts per day will that be? i know plenty of real researchers and they have far more important things to do that convince Aussie rules fans that "i am a real scientist" or have that much free time to kill. Meh.
Take it to PMs. Completely off topic.27K yourself which is nothing to be sneezed at.
Snake has 53K in 6.75 years which is about 20 posts a day. Most of them are very short and would take about 1 minute to write. 20 minutes out of someone's day is nothing.
So just to be clear, fire chiefs have said Greenies blocking controlled burns is not an issue and police have confirmed arson is not the cause of the major fires (and the Australian’s figures about arson arrests were all over the shop), but the climate change deniers are talking about arson and controlled burns?
Usually, when the facts change, I change my mind. Bold approach from these guys to do the opposite.
Why are there so many personal attacks on these ex fire chiefs? Just because they are arguing for action on climate change?The ex fire chiefs that became involved in Flannery's pet political project the 'Emergency Leaders for Climate Action'? Suffering from relevance deprivation syndrome in retirement, Flannery gives them a chance to be in the limelight again. One of them (Mullins) was already on Flannery's 'Climate Council', a paid position no doubt. I'm just gutted that donations to the ELCA are tax deductible. I don't want any proportion of my hard-earned funding a political project allowing them to take jaunts overseas for conferences and speaking engagements and whatever other ideas Flannery comes up with to spend all the moolah on. A beautiful post retirement gravy train.
Meanwhile organisations representing people on the front line (firefighters unions and associations) not willing to accept Flannery & Mullins "it's Climate Change wot did it", clamour for a Royal Commision to get the real answers.
Why are there so many personal attacks on these ex fire chiefs? Just because they are arguing for action on climate change?
Suddenly we just accept people trashing the reputations of people who have spent their lives saving the lives and livelihoods of others.
Why is Flannery a dirty word? Doesn't he has a masters in Earth science?
Do you disagree with their findings and their science? Or just their position?
Why are you posing it as 'it's either climate change or a royal commission'...?
I don't think I've ever mentioned Flannery before that post.you revere him as a climate prophet.
I don't think I've ever mentioned Flannery before that post.
I don't think you're sorry.It's not the first time you've jumped to his defence so I just assumed. If I'm mistaken then I'm sorry.
I don't think it matters.What is your opinion of the man then?
I think you just did a search of my posting history, and found that I'd never mentioned him before.
So you've looked for a different way to continue to mischaracterise me.
Nor do I think your opinion of him matters.
Why is Flannery a dirty word?
You are capable of better than this.
Oh ffs. Kelly is a nutter.
I couldn't give a toss about climate change, I care about the bush and forest management.
Stating that late November bushfires is unprecedented and therefore proof of global warming is just plain wrong.
50 years ago the bushfire season started in September and ran for 4 months.
60 years ago the bushfire season started in October and ran for 3 months.
The only new thing this season is how many fires were deliberately lit. Im sure saturated media coverage had nothing to do with it....
Can I ask you a question.
These current bushfires, are they climate change related?
If they are, can you explain how and why.
The ex fire chiefs that became involved in Flannery's pet political project the 'Emergency Leaders for Climate Action'? Suffering from relevance deprivation syndrome in retirement, Flannery gives them a chance to be in the limelight again. One of them (Mullins) was already on Flannery's 'Climate Council', a paid position no doubt. I'm just gutted that donations to the ELCA are tax deductible. I don't want any proportion of my hard-earned funding a political project allowing them to take jaunts overseas for conferences and speaking engagements and whatever other ideas Flannery comes up with to spend all the moolah on. What a wonderful way to spend your retirement - joining Flannery & Gleta on the great Climate change gravy train. Is it really any surprise I'm not impressed by a bunch of ex-trade unionists and public servants coming out in favour of leftist scare-filled rhetoric?
It's all political. The Chief Executive of Flannery's Climate Council (Amanda McKenzie) a former board member of the Whitlam Institute and founder of the Australian Youth Climate Coalition, the activist group that has paid for climate change protests by schoolchildren in Canberra and other capital cities.
Meanwhile organisations representing people on the front line (firefighters unions and associations) not willing to accept Flannery & Mullins "it's Climate Change wot did it", clamour for a Royal Commision to get the real answers.
And how many were deliberately lit?Stating that late November bushfires is unprecedented and therefore proof of global warming is just plain wrong.
50 years ago the bushfire season started in September and ran for 4 months.
60 years ago the bushfire season started in October and ran for 3 months.
The only new thing this season is how many fires were deliberately lit. Im sure saturated media coverage had nothing to do with it....
It's not the first time you've jumped to his defence so I just assumed. If I'm mistaken then I'm sorry.
What is your opinion of the man then? Why do you feel the need to defend him? Do you think he's a great science communicator who is adding credence to the cause of Climate Change education?
In 2006 he said "Before 2004, the rate of melt was such that scientists believed the icecap would melt entirely by about 2100. At the trajectory set by the new rate of melt, however, there will be no Arctic icecap in the next five to 15 years." He then went on to ask his readers (in the Age) to "Picture an eight-storey building by a beach, then imagine waves lapping its roof. That's what a 25-metre rise in sea level looks like."
If you're going to the Melbourne rally, don't forget to take your raincoat or brolly.Geez they might have to rustle up some PSOs I reckon.
Vicpolice are having us on. Full scale NYE fireworks with hundreds of RFA on standby no problem, but a small protest to urge the government to address the base of these fires... a real distraction.
And how many were deliberately lit?
What is causing various species of previously non-migratory animals to shift hundreds of KMs in to new environments?