List Mgmt. Collingwood Trade Talk 2016

[JollyBallsUp]

I reckon clubs would happily give up 2 first round picks for Moore on his own at this point. The kids looking like being the next big thing, he just has it all.

when you talk about 2 1st rounders what are we exactly talking about. I would not consider any picks higher than 6 in meeting the 2 1st round pick equation.

 

[JollyBallsUp]

Hrovat might be handy but the discussion is really the battle of the steak knives.

I know and I would prefer Jong as the stake knives over Hrovat.

 

[Bay Pie]

Marchbank would be a very good get. At least it would sure up our defense, in terms of our skills back there. How do you rate him?

Seconded Snoop Dog. Also thoughts on WHE ?

 

[Apex36]

when you talk about 2 1st rounders what are we exactly talking about. I would not consider any picks higher than 6 in meeting the 2 1st round pick equation.

2 top 10 picks. And they'd happily cough that up without asking for steak knives imo.

 

[Snoop Dog]

Thanks for that. Broomhead the same trade value as Cloke?

Age would account for most of it would think but I think it reasonably well recognised Tim is a talent. Maybe mid 30's but you start looking at deals done in the mid 30's and doesnt feel quite right.

 

[Quicky]

Age would account for most of it would think but I think it reasonably well recognised Tim is a talent. Maybe mid 30's but you start looking at deals done in the mid 30's and doesnt feel quite right.

Better off retaining unless Broomhead wants out.

 

[Snoop Dog]

Good work Snoop.

I still find the value of Witts and Cloke trades a bit optimistic.

Particularly in light of some other trades like Zac Smith, McEvoy, Sam Jacobs, Billy Longer and Barry Hall trades for example.

I don't think either of those 2 boys are playing as well as most of the trades you mentioned.

Somewhere in the range of 25 to 30 and we've made out pretty decently I suspect (even considering academy/father sons pushing that back).

Its hard to judge bc the other overlay was how people rated the draft year and given this is a decent one then maybe what a pick 20 was worth in a certain years talent pool is different in another. Thats a meaningful overlay and certainly this year is a decent pool so you may be right.

Re the other comment though not sure I agree many of those blokes were going ok when they were traded. In fact most of them were not going that well with the exception of maybe McEvoy and Hall.

 

[Snoop Dog]

Marchbank would be a very good get. At least it would sure up our defense, in terms of our skills back there. How do you rate him?

He is a very highly rated talent. One of the blokes who can play tall and take a few different types. His decision making has been very good and he is physically strong in the contest. Decision making with the ball very good to. From all reports a good club guy as well.

Will be an interesting one for us bc it requires us to answer where we stand on Brown, Keefe, Frost and Marsh. Certainly dont need all those plus Marchbank.

 

[Snoop Dog]

Better off retaining unless Broomhead wants out.

I agree completely with that. I would want to know that his body is robust though in which case I might have a different view.

But he has elite skill and decision making.

 

[unplugged]

Oh Dear.

How would you suggest it would happen otherwise, then?

If the rumours are that the Dogs are a chance to get Hurley and may part ways with Boyd to open up the salary cap, that is.

Ps did you just board search "Tom Boyd" to find my post? Surely you don't have that much time to stalk each club's trade thread...

 

[CasuallyDressed]

What do you think it would realistically take to bring Walters over?

Would love to get him to the Pies. I don't mind the look of Tommy Langdon's bro either.

 

[JollyBallsUp]

What do you think it would realistically take to bring Walters over?

A one way ticket would be a good start. I am not sure if he is hooked up but we can arrange that as well. Finally a god father deal would seal the deal.

 

[1eye]

The year Beams got traded was a big thread too.

Yep that was the Beamo, Aisho, and Redo, trades!!!

 

[Apex36]

Yep that was the Beamo, Aisho, and Redo, trades!!!

I kinda miss that Beams trade thread. Lots of angst, but plenty of lols provided by eddiebankbalance with his trade avatars!

 

[BRWB]

How would you suggest it would happen otherwise, then?

If the rumours are that the Dogs are a chance to get Hurley and may part ways with Boyd to open up the salary cap, that is.

Ps did you just board search "Tom Boyd" to find my post? Surely you don't have that much time to stalk each club's trade thread...

With all due respect. Imagine Travis was 20 and your only KPF. Would you trade him for a backman?

 

[eddiebankbalance]

I kinda miss that Beams trade thread. Lots of angst, but plenty of lols provided by eddiebankbalance with his trade avatars!

Blinking av's appearing right across the BF board

 

[unplugged]

With all due respect. Imagine Travis was 20 and your only KPF. Would you trade him for a backman?

I would if it also meant getting an older, experienced forward (Cloke equivalent) at the same time as getting Crameri back from suspension. Not to mention that Hurley can play both ends.

As well as clearing up some cap space, if it's as big a problem as some are saying.

 

[BRWB]

I would if it also meant getting an older, experienced forward (Cloke equivalent) at the same time as getting Crameri back from suspension. Not to mention that Hurley can play both ends.

As well as clearing up some cap space, if it's as big a problem as some are saying.

Would you still do it if that experienced key forward was not getting a game behind White and at times Cox?

Anyway apologies just keeping an eye on your thread as it seems we may be doing some business.

 

[Baird]

With all due respect. Imagine Travis was 20 and your only KPF. Would you trade him for a backman?

If Cloke was a spud and had a cap hit of 1mil for the next 5 years, and if that defender was an AA, then yes

 

[BRWB]

If Cloke was a spud and had a cap hit of 1mil for the next 5 years, and if that defender was an AA, then yes

All a bit early to say on spud calls IMO. But I wouldn't be holding your breath that we trade Boyd. Just IMO.

 

[nahnah]

I kinda miss that Beams trade thread. Lots of angst, but plenty of lols provided by eddiebankbalance with his trade avatars!

That was peak big footy.. The Treloar/Aish threads were pretty damn good too, can't see anything like those happening this off season though

 

[unplugged]

Would you still do it if that experienced key forward was not getting a game behind White and at times Cox?

Anyway apologies just keeping an eye on your thread as it seems we may be doing some business.

Also depends if the rumours about Beveridge not rating or liking Boyd are true (although I doubt it).

You never know though, we might be purposely keeping Travis out of our side on the knowledge that he wants to explore his options for next year.

If someone's leaving, the sooner you get used to them not being there the better*.

* unless said player is Dangerfield and bringing kids through the gates.

No worries. It's gonna be a long couple of months.

 

[TW Sherrin]

All a bit early to say on spud calls IMO. But I wouldn't be holding your breath that we trade Boyd. Just IMO.

You can't trade Toyd. It would be admitting it was a mistake and too embarrassing.

Gordon won't do it.

 

[BRWB]

You can't trade Toyd. It would be admitting it was a mistake and too embarrassing.

Gordon won't do it.

Having said all that I'd happily trade Boyd for Darce

 

[Matt_352]

Having said all that I'd happily trade Boyd for Darce

Youd have to add a 1st rounder. Boyd nowhere near Moore at present.