Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

[Astronema]

 

[dav3]

Imagine accusing others of being scared but believing in a global vaccine conspiracy

He's clearly a shill for big Vet Pharma

 

[dirty2]

Feeble minded peasant

True... #sackhinkley

 

[Doctor Feel]

"i interact quite well" is one of the funniest things i've ever read.

 

[GoTheMightyCrows]

How dare he have a different opinion, shock horror - send him to the gallows.

 

[wallumi]

Their posting reads like Homer Simpson after he fell asleep listening to a vocabulary tape

If we were to do a double blind study on the productivity of this discussion thread, it is likely that posting a Simpson's meme as a summary argument would get you located into the 'ignore' cohort.

 

[wallumi]

"i interact quite well" is one of the funniest things i've ever read.

Well then, perhaps it's you who doesn't get out enough.

 

[Del165198]

"i interact quite well" is one of the funniest things i've ever read.

interacting or merely exchanging long protein strings?

 

[wallumi]

What's it like being you?

It's good. I don't have to get angry and fearful about people disagreeing with me. Except perhaps when the basis of their disagreement so animates them with fearful misdirection that they endorse mandatory social policies that have no sound basis in fact.

 

[Del165198]

It's good. I don't have to get angry and fearful about people disagreeing with me. Except perhaps when the basis of their disagreement so animates them with fearful misdirection that they endorse mandatory social policies that have no sound basis in fact.

What are your qualifications to speak on the matter? Why are you smarter than say, the medical research team at Oxford University?

I didn't read your extremely long post because it's obvious you're a bit unhinged.

 

[dav3]

If we were to do a double blind study on the productivity of this discussion thread, it is likely that posting a Simpson's meme as a summary argument would get you located into the 'ignore' cohort.

Well I started posting some wordy response with a bunch of syllables, but felt like such a pretentious prat I deleted it and went with the simple yet accurate response

 

[wallumi]

Hey bro, i'm vaccinated and I didn't die. My partner who is pregnant and got vaccinated during the pregnancy is also alive and didn't die, baby has gone whole pregnancy without issue. Has anyone checked on Smallpox recently, vaccines clearly don't work.

Thank you for listening to my TED talk.

I'm pleased for you on that count. However you are also not protected against viral infection or from transmitting it.

The smallpox vaccine was/is a vaccine and it seems that it did work.

Can you see the critical difference between these two things?

 

[Festerz]

I don't have to get angry and fearful about people disagreeing with me. Except perhaps when the basis of their disagreement so animates them with fearful misdirection that they endorse mandatory social policies that have no sound basis in fact.

Guess getting meaningful work has been tough since that gig as HAL in Kubrick's 2001?

 

[Schulzenfest]

"i interact quite well" is one of the funniest things i've ever read.

Greetings fellow Port Adelaide Football Concern fanatics. Would you like to discuss some human vaccines, I mean vaccines?

 

[wallumi]

What are your qualifications to speak on the matter? Why are you smarter than say, the medical research team at Oxford University?

I didn't read your extremely long post because it's obvious you're a bit unhinged.

I made the mistake of trying to respond to the full extent of your post. I should have just reacted to fragments. When in Rome...?

I'm not smarter than the 'Oxford University research team' (do they wear numbered uniforms like the Oxford Rugby team?). However a lot of papers and articles are being produced by people just as smart and as accredited in the relevant fields. The discrepancies across the full realm of this topic are not hard to identify and understand in principle.

Why people feel such visceral need to deny and demonise this growing range of discrepancy is an awfully alarming feature of the whole thing.

 

[FishingRick04]

Hang m high, but flog m first.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

Perhaps they will get a tax concession for not being able to access the facilities they would pay for?

 

[malcheski]

This is either a Janus burner account or Kang & Kodos post on Large Burely

 

[Del165198]

Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.


Wow amazing findings on ivermectin! Guy who advocates it publishes paper says it may work, sometimes. If the disease isn't severe. Possibly. I'm moderately sure.

This isn't some smoking gun.

As has been publicly stated all over mainstream media ivermectin has had some positive results in the lab. However usually it's at very high dosages not administered to people. There are plenty of studies underway in a clinical setting, including one at Oxford, given the media attention on ivermectin.

Based on that it'll either be widely approved or it won't. My money's on it won't given the number of papers already out saying they couldn't produce a statistically significant result. But it might help a bit with people who don't have a severe dose to begin with.
Are you vaccinated?

 

[FishingRick04]

I made the mistake of trying to respond to the full extent of your post. I should have just reacted to fragments. When in Rome...?

I'm not smarter than the 'Oxford University research team' (do they wear numbered uniforms like the Oxford Rugby team?). However a lot of papers and articles are being produced by people just as smart and as accredited in the relevant fields. The discrepancies across the full realm of this topic are not hard to identify and understand in principle.

Why people feel such visceral need to deny and demonise this growing range of discrepancy is an awfully alarming feature of the whole thing.

The media and Government played this magnificently, it's what they wanted.

 

[wallumi]

Guess getting meaningful work has been tough since that gig as HAL in Kubrick's 2001?

The shame of the modern world is having to deliver these cheap shots on line. In the old days you could s****** warmly and reassuringly with the boys after each one. Kind of empty doing it alone, isn't it?

 

[malcheski]

The shame of the modern world is having to deliver these cheap shots on line. In the old days you could s****** warmly and reassuringly with the boys after each one. Kind of empty doing it alone, isn't it?

Nah I tend to sit on my hand first so it feels like someone else is doing it

 

[dav3]

This is either a Janus burner account or Kang & Kodos post on Large Burely

Maybe Ivermectin is the next Monorail

 

[FishingRick04]

Port supporter who has a BigBall post count of 200-odd since July 2004?

It’s a conspiracy i tells ya!

I do enjoy reading their written speech, amazing grammar, too intelligent for bigfooty and clearly not Janus

 

[wallumi]

The media and Government played this magnificently, it's what they wanted.

100% agreement on that one. In many ways the actual disease response has been secondary to leveraging narrative control and maintaining an image of competency. A whole lot can be explained by premising that Govt. are white-knuckled on the handlebars whilst flying down-hill. They certainly do not like that being pointed out, even implicitly by the suggestion of alternative options. That implies existing error and they cannot tolerate such inference toward their lack of adequate clothing.

 

[FishingRick04]

What are your qualifications to speak on the matter? Why are you smarter than say, the medical research team at Oxford University?

I didn't read your extremely long post because it's obvious you're a bit unhinged.

I got it, you're Graham Cornes! He's says the same thing to footy opinionists who don't' agree with him