Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

[PAFC66]

I'd be surprised if it was Janus. He rarely gets personal in his posting and is more controlled with his expression of his ideas. The tonal quality of wallumi's missives were a lot more 'ranty' than Janus' posts ever have been.

Janus runs at the inkling of criticism

 

[PAFC66]

Looks like two massive losers to me.

Ones dominating the polls.. one isn't.

 

[dav3]

View attachment 1278245

(https://www.historyofvaccines.org/trump-and-vaccines — I can’t link the original tweet as his account was famously scotched)

You could argue that he eventually came around, but as you can see, they were very much cut from the same cloth and broadcast a ton of similar nonsense around that time, specifically pertaining to autism and ‘too much, too soon’.

TBF Trump just says whatever random shit suits his argument at the time

Reddit - Dive into anything

www.reddit.com

 

[edgie]

Ones dominating the polls.. one isn't.

Polls have always been a good indicator of how popular a conservative government is among the masses

 

[PAFC66]

Polls have always been a good indicator of how popular a conservative government is among the masses

Considering those polls come from mostly conservative platforms it's a decent indication.

You won't see a liberal government running Victoria this decade.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

I distinctly remember roughly a year ago saying that we'd end up in exactly this position because the flu vaccine has never made the flu go away. It was met with rants over herd immunity.

Haha I think that was me my bad

I still think herd immunity is possible though. If covax-19 does at a large scale what its been able to do in the trials then we could be home free.

 

[edgie]

Considering those polls come from mostly conservative platforms it's a decent indication.

You won't see a liberal government running Victoria this decade.

I feel the same way Federally unfortunately, no matter what the polling says.

 

[Astronema]

on the one hand we have letting hundreds of millions of people die of covid, or of other illnesses while hospitals are overwhelmed and hundreds of millions more end up with long covid.

OR get vaccinated and 1 in 500,000 (is that the number?) people get serious side effects

its so scary to me that our government would prefer the latter, just refusing to let people die wtf is this

 

[JimmyBC]

Ones dominating the polls.. one isn't.

Prime Ministers are always hated the other guy just runs a little backwater.

 

[OneGreatClub]

Inoculate the world to save the 200 kilo folks.

They have feelings too

 

[Papa G]

Prime Ministers are always hated the other guy just runs a little backwater.

It's the Backwater Capital.

 

[OneGreatClub]

I think I found Spartacus.

 

[Jonts]

Again, apologies to Big J if it isn’t, just noticed a lot of similar talking points (Ivermectin, pharma profit motives), and assumed there was an alias aggression/provocation bonus as the mother account was being largely ignored.

****ing hurt that I'm not big J or even 2nd to JimmyBC but Janus bloody hell

 

[edgie]

on the one hand we have letting hundreds of millions of people die of covid, or of other illnesses while hospitals are overwhelmed and hundreds of millions more end up with long covid.

OR get vaccinated and 1 in 500,000 (is that the number?) people get serious side effects

its so scary to me that our government would prefer the latter, just refusing to let people die wtf is this

Effective solution to over population.

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk

 

[PAFC66]

Prime Ministers are always hated the other guy just runs a little backwater.

Not as much as this one.

Someone from a retirement village in Adelaide calling the second biggest city in Australia a little backwater . Lel

 

[PAFC66]

It's the Backwater Capital.

Don't be jealous , Melbourne will be the biggest city in Australia by 2026.

Cheer up pissant..

You'll have more deaths then births in the coming years. I guess that's exciting.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

******* hurt that I'm not big J or even 2nd to JimmyBC but Janus bloody hell

Dont take it too hard LL Cool J

 

[tribey]

Did you read the linked paper I posted on that 'debunking' and 'withdrawal'?
On the direct account of that paper's author it was not withdrawn. The author also states he was given no response to his request for reasons for it being taken down. So who's doing science here?

So, I looked into the Bayesian statistical analysis cited by Bryant, Fordham and South Africa’s Pride: the great Tess Lawrie, as part of the alleged rebuttal to the Roman et al debunk. A debunk of the debunk, or “elegantly refuted”, if they do say so themselves.

It was done by these two chaps:




A pair of computer scientists who are openly anti-vax/anti-lockdown/anti-pandemic mitigation and who are in cahoots with other purveyors of misinformation (including BIRD) online:









And finally, some leaked screenshots from UK anti-vax group HART, showing Mr. Neil cooking up some tasty morsels in service of his beliefs (thread):




Ergo, I can’t believe these two crunched the numbers on the Roman et al meta-analysis and came to a conclusion that supported Ivermectin! No risk of bias or preconceived notions regarding the priors there! No siree! Who to believe… who to believe…

Why do you so readily accept a position that is not supported by the pertinent available facts?

Why do you so readily accept the positions of anti-vax quacks and grifters with questionable qualifications and motives?

 

[Del165198]

Why not just let everyone who wants to take Ivermectin take it? If they are right they are right, if they are wrong they are wrong.

Why not just let everyone who wants to take heroin to cure measles do it? It's their body

 

[FishingRick04]

Why not just let everyone who wants to take heroin to cure measles do it? It's their body

Ironically they could if they want too. It’s more easily accessible

 

[Papa G]

Why not just let everyone who wants to take heroin to cure measles do it? It's their body

Why not? Not sure it's quite the same, but hey of they want to, why not.

 

[Del165198]

Remember the days scomo said repeatedly that the vaccine will not be mandatory ? NO DEAL X


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Del165198]

Why not? Not sure it's quite the same, but hey of they want to, why not.

So you're pro legalisation of drugs? Sounds a bit clique-y papa.

 

[PAFC66]

Ironically they could if they want too. It’s more easily accessible

For a while there it was more accessible than scomos vaccines.

 

[Papa G]

So you're pro legalisation of drugs? Sounds a bit clique-y papa.

You reckon? I think this thread shows most of teh Clique to be quite afraid and conservative.