Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

[tribey]

Brisbane is gross.

Let me find a meta-analysis collated by a telephonist who is anti-Sydney and believes calamine lotion can be used as brick mortar and I’ll refute this after adding 1,000 words of my own fluff interspersed with the odd smug insult.

 

[wallumi]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

 

[tribey]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

Still at it, huh. You’re a zealot rubbing shoulders with other zealots.

 

[wallumi]

Let me find a meta-analysis collated by a telephonist who is anti-Sydney and believes calamine lotion can be used as brick mortar and I’ll refute this after adding 1,000 words of my own fluff interspersed with the odd smug insult.

Check out the video links I just posted, unless you'd rather spend the day fluffing yourself.

 

[tribey]

Check out the video links I just posted, unless you'd rather spend the day fluffing yourself.

No. You already exposed yourself as indulging in confirmation bias from fringe, bias-soaked sources already.

Credibility zero.

 

[OneGreatClub]

The reason why Ivermectin should and is being used as a treatment for COVID is because it’s a protease inhibitor, the same way that Pfizer’s new wonder drug is:

“We observed that, boceprevir, ombitasvir, paritaprevir, tipranavir, and micafungin exhibited partial inhibitory effect whereas, ivermectin blocked more than 85% of 3CLpro activity of SARS-CoV-2.”

Identification of 3-chymotrypsin like protease (3CLPro) inhibitors as potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 agents - Communications Biology

Here, the authors identify potential drugs that target 3-chymotrypsin like protease (3CLpro), which is a pivotal protease for the replication of SARS-CoV-2. They found that off-target inhibitors such as ivermectin and micafungin inhibit 3CLpro enzyme activity, suggesting that these molecules...

www.nature.com

3CLpro is the protease that Pfizer’s drug targets.

“If approved or authorized, PAXLOVID™, which originated in Pfizer’s laboratories, would be the first oral antiviral of its kind, a specifically designed SARS-CoV-2-3CL protease inhibitor.”

Pfizer’s Novel COVID-19 Oral Antiviral Treatment Candidate Reduced Risk of Hospitalization or Death by 89% in Interim Analysis of Phase 2/3 EPIC-HR Study | Pfizer

PAXLOVID™ (PF-07321332; ritonavir) was found to reduce the risk of hospitalization or death by 89% compared to placebo in non-hospitalized high-risk adults with COVID-19 In the overall study population through Day 28, no deaths were reported in patients who received PAXLOVID™ as compared to 10...

www.pfizer.com

So it’s real simple - either you think Pfizer is talking sh*t, which means why the fu** did you get vaccinated…or they are telling the truth, which means Ivermectin is incredibly useful in treating COVID.

I told you from day one the reason why Ivermectin was shilled against was due to the fact that it’s off patent and costs 6 cents a pill. You also can’t authorise emergency use of vaccines if there is a viable treatment already available.

Sorry Janus I have re read this and it does suggest you believe there is a conspiracy by Big Pharma ie Pfizer to block the use of your 100% safe and effective drug Ivermectin in order to rip off the world by selling dangerous vaccines and a new carbon copy of ivermectin under a different name with obviously the majority of governments and health officials and scientists worldwide in on the game.
Gee lucky Pfizer to have so many on board destroying their Economies and population just to help Pfizer get rich. So yes Big Brother conspiracy.
I cannot read your view any other way.
As for the protease inhibitor perhaps listen to some alternate views on the comparison between Pfizer’s new drug and ivermectin.

Look no one is saying ivermectin might not be useful to some degree but so far it has not been proven to work in safe doses enough to satisfy the majority of scientists.

 

[OneGreatClub]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

Lol.. have you listened to the podcast yet?

 

[OneGreatClub]

Brisbane is gross.

Unbearable with a mask.

 

[wallumi]

Still at it, huh. You’re a zealot rubbing shoulders with other zealots.

Reply to the posted material, not your imagined, pre-conceived view of it. If you have the courage to confront those pre-conceptions that is. If you can look at any of those videos and still assert that the presenter is a zealot it would say a lot more about you than it would about him.

 

[tribey]

“for those interested in science” says guy in that circle.

 

[wallumi]

Lol.. have you listened to the podcast yet?

I haven't yet but I do intend to. Check out those videos in the meantime. A comparison between the fundaments of the two will be interesting. I'd be interested to hear how you might possibly, or not, identify any extremism or 'anti-science' in this guy's work. It is the most accessible and sound bridge I've yet seen between the polar opposites that have been created in this current fiasco.

 

[wallumi]

View attachment 1278793

“for those interested in science” says guy in that circle.

You chose fluffing. I'd have won money on that result although I'd have needed an incredibly high stake given the odds.

 

[tribey]

You chose fluffing. I'd have won money on that result although I'd have needed an incredibly high stake given the odds.

“You chose fluffing”, says the guy hiding behind an alt-account (for reasons unknown), whose fringe crusade is currently floundering in the depths of a footy forum.

 

[OneGreatClub]

I haven't yet but I do intend to. Check out those videos in the meantime. A comparison between the fundaments of the two will be interesting. I'd be interested to hear how you might possibly, or not, identify any extremism or 'anti-science' in this guy's work. It is the most accessible and sound bridge I've yet seen between the polar opposites that have been created in this current fiasco.

Yes

 

[dav3]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

Thankyou for such an informed post with content from an experienced virologist................ oops no wait, the guy has a PHD in philosophy (nursing education), and a cert in Tropical Diseases from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b

 

[OneGreatClub]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

Ok my podcast directly addresses the issues he has with any rebuttals of the invermectin trials in video three so I look forward to your reply after listening to that.
He asked for details of these serious errors in the research. He seems to be insinuating that are being deliberately vague.
The podcast is extremely detailed.

 

[El Zorro]

Thankyou for such an informed post with content from an experienced virologist................ oops no wait, the guy has a PHD in philosophy (nursing education), and a cert in Tropical Diseases from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b

PhD actually means Doctor of Philosophy, even if you do it in, say, virology. The origins of the name come from the middle ages. It doesn't mean that you studied philosophy.

Having said that, I initially thought this guy was a nurse. But he is actually a nursing lecturer. So, yeah.

 

[OneGreatClub]

PhD actually means Doctor of Philosophy, even if you do it in, say, virology. The origins of the name come from the middle ages. It doesn't mean that you studied philosophy.

Having said that, I initially thought this guy was a nurse. But he is actually a nursing lecturer. So, yeah.

He was promoting hydroxychloroquine in the past too.

 

[Festerz]

PhD actually means Doctor of Philosophy, even if you do it in, say, virology. The origins of the name come from the middle ages. It doesn't mean that you studied philosophy.

Having said that, I initially thought this guy was a nurse. But he is actually a nursing lecturer. So, yeah.

I have no problem with that persons credentials or him having a strong view on issues and expressing them on his youtube channel. He puts his name to it and provides evidence to support his views. That carefully selected evidence and his conclusions are of course contestable and rightly ridiculed by many. But nevertheless they are readily available on Youtube for anyone interested - that is the place to view and debate them.

My issue is mass spamming of youtube videos from the same questionable source by a single poster who has effectively hijacked this thread in the past week.

 

[Duck Farmer]

... the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Is this an offshoot of the Dubai School of Polar Exploration?

 

[Del165198]

For those interested in science I recommend the following videos examining critical parts within the current overall controversy. Those who are more inclined toward character attack and deflection of the matters they are very clearly and competently considered will predictably do so. Likewise those who can't resist bronzing up by dismissing the presenter as an 'anti-vaxxer' will invariably smear themselves obnoxiously stupid.

These videos very effectively illustrate the seriously distortions that are underway within 'official', mass-media enforced narratives. They also indicate the severe harm that is evidently occurring, and might possibly occur, directly due to this rigid enforcement of ordained 'science'.

These few links are just a selection from the many videos published by this very easily understood and credible presenter on this massive arena of current affairs. All of them are hugely informative, respective to both pertinent facts and analytic procedure.

A pharmacological comparison of the new (patented) Pfizer antiviral vs Ivermectin:


Response analysis of a ‘Factcheck’ attack published on the above video just days after its posting:



Debunking the BBC 'debunk' of an earlier posting re Ivermectin:



Incorrect vaccination technique is standard procedure and could be a major cause of vaccine injury:



Further proof of the impact of incorrect vaccination technique:



Pfizer vaccine trial whistle blower:

What is the point with this? This one guys view point is still miles away from your anti vax stance.

 

[wallumi]

PhD actually means Doctor of Philosophy, even if you do it in, say, virology. The origins of the name come from the middle ages. It doesn't mean that you studied philosophy.

Having said that, I initially thought this guy was a nurse. But he is actually a nursing lecturer. So, yeah.

Which completely qualifies him to make his posts on incorrect injection technique and vaccine injury.

I'd have thought the jabbers would be keen to pick up on that one to help clarify the source of the known and sometime very serious side effects arising from vaccination events. However they can't put the kryptonite down even for that personal relevant and beneficial purpose. The behaviour has reached a Pavlovian state.

 

[Del165198]

Waluigi has almost exhausted his entertainment value. Just go and get the jab mate. Don't be scared, you'll be fine.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

Lol, always trying to obfuscate that which doesn’t fit in with your paradigm.

There’s no grand conspiracy other than a pharmaceutical company saw an opportunity to make money and used their contacts inside the FDA and CDC to make sure their investment paid off. No stupid population control bullshit. No 5G tracking chips. All that rubbish is designed to hide the truth about what is really happening so those who question the narrative are seen as crazy.

The real truth is always boring. And the real truth is vaccination helps those over 60 and who are immunocompromised, but for most people, Ivermectin would be just fine. But Ivermectin only costs 6 cents per pill, and no one is paying for a study that proves there is a cheap way of treating COVID. Which is why it will never be “proven” other than with anecdotal evidence.

Most of you are still under this impression that the medical industry is out to save lives. I think it’s out to make money by saving lives, and it will choose the path that a) makes the most coin and b) ensures it has repeating customers.

You wanna call that a conspiracy theory? Fine. I just call it good business.

The funny thing is back before covid a lot of the people telling us to blindly trust pharma now are the same people who were making the exact same criticisms of big pharma and their profit over people motivated decisions, just look at the rage post-Martin Shrekli.

Its not a conspiracy, its just rational, amoral actors making money.

 

[EskimoPAFC]

Ivermectin cost 6¢ a pill how many people in the world 7ish billion?

6¢ X 7,000,000,000 X how many times we would need the pill = quite alot of loose change I would imagine....

The company (Merck) that owns ivermectin also owns the competing product molnuvapir that goes for $700 a course.