Remove this Banner Ad

Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What is the point with this? This one guys view point is still miles away from your anti vax stance.

The point of it is provide useful and credible information about matters of significant import to the events underway. It is not to prosecute the polarised white hats/black hats theatre that you seem be stuck in.

Look at the videos at face value. At least just for the viewing duration forget that I posted them. You might learn something.
 
The point of it is provide useful and credible information about matters of significant import to the events underway. It is not to prosecute the polarised white hats/black hats theatre that you seem be stuck in.

Look at the videos at face value. At least just for the viewing duration forget that I posted them. You might learn something.

Nah I'm good, cheers 👍
 
I have no problem with that persons credentials or him having a strong view on issues and expressing them on his youtube channel. He puts his name to it and provides evidence to support his views. That carefully selected evidence and his conclusions are of course contestable and rightly ridiculed by many. But nevertheless they are readily available on Youtube for anyone interested - that is the place to view and debate them.

My issue is mass spamming of youtube videos from the same questionable source by a single poster who has effectively hijacked this thread in the past week.

I've hijacked nothing. I've simply intervened upon an overly homogenous echo chamber. You find that uncomfortable and attack me for it. How can I possibly 'hijack' 380 odd pages of generally consistent narrative?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That upstart outsider Wallumi - hijacking this thread with his dangerous and unwelcome ideas - what you say boys? I say he don't make the parish line...

View attachment 1278907

In terms of dumb things I have seen today, this is probably the dumbest, and I've read most of waluigi's posts.
 
Thankyou for such an informed post with content from an experienced virologist................ oops no wait, the guy has a PHD in philosophy (nursing education), and a cert in Tropical Diseases from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine :$

But you'll believe what you read in the papers! See his two analyses of the BCC 'debunk' and the alleged 'Factcheck'. These two alleged 'debunks' are constructed by journalists, are ridden with gross errors of fact and logic, and are mass broadcast under influential mastheads. In such fashion they model the receptive shape of millions of otherwise uniformed minds.

In similar vein you and ilk will accept a Corporate product study without question but will seek to magnify pinhead issues into allegation of research bias within fully independent studies that you don't like. You have no understanding of either yet you take sides.

This guy at very least will help you understand how to read and process the literature. You don't have to agree with his findings to learn more about how to understand the countervailing evidence papers. Despite your dismissal of his credentials, they most definitely give him that very useful capacity.
 
Since when did good equate to wilfully ignorant?

You've thrown your lot in with Pete Evans and Craig Kelly and you accuse others of being ignorant 😂😂😂

Have you devoted an equal amount of time to reading and reviewing all the research and publications showing the effectiveness of vaccines? How about just looking at some graphs showing the massive reductions in covid deaths in say, the UK, post the introduction of vaccines.

How about the reams of evidence that you're far more likely to end up in hospital due to covid if you aren't vaccinated? Spent many hours looking at that, or just the youtubers that share your POV?
 
I've hijacked nothing. I've simply intervened upon an overly homogenous echo chamber. You find that uncomfortable and attack me for it. How can I possibly 'hijack' 380 odd pages of generally consistent narrative?

This forum itself is certainly less echo chamberish on this than most places on the internet nowadays.

I mean the vast majority of people on here are vaxed, but that is reflective of society.
 
By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines but are in fact gene therapies, as they do not induce immunity. People who take up this high risk experimental medical procedure are consenting to getting injected with a bioengineered spike protein which is toxic to the human body. The horrific adverse events that are occurring are unprecedented & the worse is still to come.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I've hijacked nothing. I've simply intervened upon an overly homogenous echo chamber. You find that uncomfortable and attack me for it. How can I possibly 'hijack' 380 odd pages of generally consistent narrative?

Look, Walluni or whatever username you are choosing to adopt at the moment. If you want the definition of an echo chamber take a look at your own posts.

You have just spammed us all with 6 youtube videos from the same proclaimed expert in a single post. The same guy you've posted videos of previously and have spent countless posts today and previous days over the past week blabbing on about as if he is some recognised world authority - he ain't.

The only good thing that can be said is that now you have found a guru to worship and share with us all your pompous turgid thesis length posts have stopped (although it was pretty obvious from day 1 that all of us could see through their fakery).
 
By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines but are in fact gene therapies, as they do not induce immunity. People who take up this high risk experimental medical procedure are consenting to getting injected with a bioengineered spike protein which is toxic to the human body. The horrific adverse events that are occurring are unprecedented & the worse is still to come.
W-T-F
 
By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines but are in fact gene therapies, as they do not induce immunity. People who take up this high risk experimental medical procedure are consenting to getting injected with a bioengineered spike protein which is toxic to the human body. The horrific adverse events that are occurring are unprecedented & the worse is still to come.
You might need to do better than this to add anything of substance.
 
I've hijacked nothing. I've simply intervened upon an overly homogenous echo chamber. You find that uncomfortable and attack me for it. How can I possibly 'hijack' 380 odd pages of generally consistent narrative?
However you do lose a bit of credibility when all you seem to post is from your own echo chamber AKA the Frontline Covid19 Critical Care Alliance.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

the behind the bastards episode on horse paste made the facts rather plainly clear and in a much more entertaining fashion than gishgallop846392736

Over 3.5 billion doses of Ivermectin administered to humans since its inception to the market and with one of the highest safety profiles comparative to all medications. A Nobel prize was awarded in 2015 to its developers in recognition of its vast and affordable service to humanity.

But yeah, horse paste.

Who has the tin hat?

Behinds the bastards? Were the presenters talking out of the backs of their heads?
 
Why has the definition of vaccine been amended in the US this year?

Why are 'full stops' at the end of sentences known as 'periods' in the US?

Irrelevant obfuscation with a hint to some sort of government vaccine conspiracy doesn't change the fact that this statement:

'By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines...'

Is FALSE.

And with that I'm putting you on ignore and departing this thread as it has turned into a poor persons Sky News after Dark.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top