Remove this Banner Ad

Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You've thrown your lot in with Pete Evans and Craig Kelly and you accuse others of being ignorant 😂😂😂

Have you devoted an equal amount of time to reading and reviewing all the research and publications showing the effectiveness of vaccines? How about just looking at some graphs showing the massive reductions in covid deaths in say, the UK, post the introduction of vaccines.

How about the reams of evidence that you're far more likely to end up in hospital due to covid if you aren't vaccinated? Spent many hours looking at that, or just the youtubers that share your POV?

Aside from the first paragraph, which is a typically nonsensical dismissal by false construction and false association, the rest of it comprises truisms and not absolute fact.

The factors of risk and vaccine suitability to meet that risk vary categorically between people and circumstances. I understand that the complexity of reality is just too hard for this system's need for automation. Nonetheless I'm not personally comfortable with sacrificing my own best choices for the convenience of a range of dominant interests that are seeking to prioritise their own outcomes.

You might not understand all of that but possibly others will.
 
Don't you lose credibility when you make such conveniently inaccurate generalisations? How is Dr. John Campbell part of that alleged limitation?
Do your research and you will see lol.

All I am saying is you accuse us of doing what you are actually doing.
What’s the terminology for that… projection?

You seem to have come in here wanting to be seen as some purveyor of the ‘truth.’

Believe it or not, most of what you post is not new to us, we have seen it before.. we are not living in a cocoon.
You believe your sources that is all.

Maybe lighten up. This is BF after all.
 
Apparently they have


Diabetics are being prescribed to reduce hunger and lose weight. There’s your problem solved 😂

When I was young our family had a ranch. One year we had a really bad drought and the cost to feed and water the horses was almost prohibitive - dad wondered if we could reduce the running costs by reducing the horses feed by a small amount every day. It worked a treat - each day the horses were fed a smaller and smaller portion. Dad began to wonder if we could get them to a point where we wouldn't have to feed them at all and thus reduce the feed cost by the corresponding amount. The experiment worked brilliantly! We were able to get the horses to the point where we didn't have to feed them at all and were just about to claim a huge victory - then the bloody things died.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Look, Walluni or whatever username you are choosing to adopt at the moment. If you want the definition of an echo chamber take a look at your own posts.

You have just spammed us all with 6 youtube videos from the same proclaimed expert in a single post. The same guy you've posted videos of previously and have spent countless posts today and previous days over the past week blabbing on about as if he is some recognised world authority - he ain't.

The only good thing that can be said is that now you have found a guru to worship and share with us all your pompous turgid thesis length posts have stopped (although it was pretty obvious from day 1 that all of us could see through their fakery).

I listed 6 links. It is not my fault that the site embeds them into such a dominating format.

The material in them is vitally relevant and soundly presented. The presenting doctor is pro-vaccination, which is completely lost on the forum's turd fondlers who impulsively fling their excrement at anything not familiar to them. His vaccine support very properly doesn't stop him from understanding a wide range of medical care and response issues arising within the current situation. He can identify and lucidly explain a range of these issues that are crucially important to all of us, whether or not we might want to recognise that. I thought some might. You're not amongst them. Fine. There's no real need to carry on like a monkey about it. Only your imagined one.

The flawed injection method presented in two of those videos may well explain a large part of the vaccine complication issues. Do we just deny these real injuries just coz Craig Kelly? Looking at the evidence may well find that the vaccines themselves are not causing injury but that its the careless method of their mal-administration. That wolud certainly make me feel a bit better toward them although other issues remain, like the futility of relying just upon them given vaccine efficacy data.

As these 'vaccines' now stand everyone will eventually get Covid, vaccinated or not. They are not delivering herd immunity and the authorities are not being honest about that. Which also means they are not being honest about their actual strategic goals. It is very possible that by now they don't even know what these are. This situation makes it a practical fact that affordable effective prophylaxis is really important in dealing with the course of gradual advancing infection immunity. A safe, effective 6¢/day treatment will go a lot further and eat into much less other vital Govt. spending than will dedication to a corporate $700/dose prescription. It worries me that Governments like giving our money out to large corporations. It certainly improves post-parliamentary job prospects.

Such capacity for lack of care, transparency and honesty is a large part of why some people are a lot less trusting of Govt. decrees than many others might be.
 
By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines but are in fact gene therapies, as they do not induce immunity. People who take up this high risk experimental medical procedure are consenting to getting injected with a bioengineered spike protein which is toxic to the human body. The horrific adverse events that are occurring are unprecedented & the worse is still to come.
You must be pretty disappointed that you and your unvaccinated mates likely won’t survive long enough to see the rest of us drop off like flies from the vaccine.
 
Why are 'full stops' at the end of sentences known as 'periods' in the US?

Irrelevant obfuscation with a hint to some sort of government vaccine conspiracy doesn't change the fact that this statement:

'By legal & historical definition these so called vaccines are not vaccines...'

Is FALSE.

And with that I'm putting you on ignore and departing this thread as it has turned into a poor persons Sky News after Dark.

So you're explaining a distinct and crucial definitional change made within the US jurisdiction by citing a trivial grammatical variation between two separate jurisdictions.

And you then use that rapier argument to adjudge me guilty of irrelevant obfuscation.

Look, I have to admit, I'm not in your league when it comes to debate.
 
Do your research and you will see lol.

All I am saying is you accuse us of doing what you are actually doing.
What’s the terminology for that… projection?

You seem to have come in here wanting to be seen as some purveyor of the ‘truth.’

Believe it or not, most of what you post is not new to us, we have seen it before.. we are not living in a cocoon.
You believe your sources that is all.

Maybe lighten up. This is BF after all.

If he is, he is. I don't see how that matters really if the data stacks up. The motive is honourable and, in accord with that motive, if key matters remain inadequately resolved then it is quite normal for people, even professional people, to form action alliances to stimulate the response required to address better resolution. I'll be interested to hear how the podcast you've provided seeks to dismiss the papers that appear to establish Ivermectin's molecular function respective to Covid replication.

That said your apparent readiness to submit to exorbitant big pharma monopolies is tragic. More tragic though is that the sum of such readiness submits us all to it.

What did you think of the outline re incorrect injection technique?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You must be pretty disappointed that you and your unvaccinated mates likely won’t survive long enough to see the rest of us drop off like flies from the vaccine.
I actually don’t wish ill will on anyone. I will make this one prediction however & will happily apologise & delete my account if proven wrong. At least one AFL player will be forced into early retirement by Finals next year due to cardiac complications (myocarditis/pericarditis/arrhythmis/or Cardiac Arrest).

EDIt: None will be forced into retirement from Sars-Cov-2 complications.
 
You must be pretty disappointed that you and your unvaccinated mates likely won’t survive long enough to see the rest of us drop off like flies from the vaccine.

This is where you show you really are full of sh*t. I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying there is no way to know its right, yet you smugly assert it as fact. It reveals the fear that drives your demand for a narrow information spectrum.

The fact that is right now panting its foul hot breath into your desperately averted face is that we are all going to get Covid, vaccinated or unvaccinated. It is just a matter of how, when and how bad. This is why the real at-risk profiles and the real fatality cause and age-group profiles are so important. It is why the infection immunity vs vaccine immunity profiles are so important. It is why the real breadth and cost of prophylaxis options are so important. It is why a whole range of other things that we haven't even begun to discuss here yet are really important.
See the documents attached here:
https://ipbes.net/pandemics
It's written by a bunch of cranks working in tin hats at a witch coven called the United Nations. Obviously they're anti-vaxxers and members of the FCAAA But give it a read anyway.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top