Half of Morrison’s base is the Facebook crew so unfortunately I cannot see this happening in the near term. Except for overseas travel.A 'no jab no play' or 'no jab no pay' policy may also assist.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Half of Morrison’s base is the Facebook crew so unfortunately I cannot see this happening in the near term. Except for overseas travel.A 'no jab no play' or 'no jab no pay' policy may also assist.
That’s been my life for years.So you can go to a nightclub but you have to wear a mask? Lol wut
This is such a * around. I will take an uber to the ground and not wear a mask. While outside I will not wear a mask. At the Camfield, I will not wear a mask (it is not a club). At the ground, I will wear a mask on the way in, but will immediately buy a beer and proceed to "drink it " for the whole game, so that I will not wear a mask.Masks though...
I think in both the Uber and Camfield (inside) you are supposed to wear a maskThis is such a fu** around. I will take an uber to the ground and not wear a mask. While outside I will not wear a mask. At the Camfield, I will not wear a mask (it is not a club). At the ground, I will wear a mask on the way in, but will immediately buy a beer and proceed to "drink it " for the whole game, so that I will not wear a mask.
What ******* peanuts come up with this sh*t? Oh, but it is all on "medical advice". The same advice that said last year, we could only have 50% capacity because of all the risks. But 9 months later, it's No worries.
Last lockdown in Jan/Feb, venues absolutely could only do 4m2 with masks in the second week. This time, the businesses have complained about the heavy handed nature of snap lockdowns and the public is grumbling, so no worries, open up completely.
Nightclubs clearly don't have friends, as they get stuck with 4m2 and masks. Except, clubs are huge, so when they add all the non-public areas in, they will have full capacity anyway. Oh, and everyone will be drinking or smoking so no masks.
This whole thing is a piss take. As it stands, we are effectively back to completely open. That's fine, if the risks warrant it. If not, we're just playing pretend and crossing our fingers.
But it's all on the medical advice though...
If I am sitting in an office with 10 people we all have to wear masks, then if myself, those 10 and another random 9 people off the street then walk into my house, we can all take our masks off.
If I am sitting in an office with 10 people we all have to wear masks, then if myself, those 10 and another random 9 people off the street then walk into my house, we can all take our masks off.
Another week of not having to strain my face for a fake smile of recognition for co-workers is a blessing really.
I guess my point is that in the grand scheme of things it really is a pointless exercise. I am by no means anti-mask and I will wear one when I have to but next week of "you have to wear a mask sometimes but other times you don't and this protects us from covid" seems a bit of a waste of time to me.The inside workplace/office thing is basically a one size fits all. It keeps it simple and clear, but it's also very annoying for small businesses.
I work in a team of about 15 in an office, but we all have our own office. There's more chance of us spreading germs by hanging off the one coffee machine or using the photo copier than there is passing by one another in close proximity to share vapour droplets or whatever.
The rule protects the large, open plan offices in the city. I understand why they've done it, because if you have too many clauses and options for individuals, it becomes murky and of low compliance. But it's still annoying.
Yeah, I'm a bit flippant about it all but I think it's really difficult - you have to draw lines somewhere and they will always end up somewhat arbitrary.I guess my point is that in the grand scheme of things it really is a pointless exercise. I am by no means anti-mask and I will wear one when I have to but next week of "you have to wear a mask sometimes but other times you don't and this protects us from covid" seems a bit of a waste of time to me.
I guess my point is that in the grand scheme of things it really is a pointless exercise. I am by no means anti-mask and I will wear one when I have to but next week of "you have to wear a mask sometimes but other times you don't and this protects us from covid" seems a bit of a waste of time to me.
I think from a health point of view you should be wearing them in a private residence, they just acknowledge it's an impossible thing to police.If I am sitting in an office with 10 people we all have to wear masks, then if myself, those 10 and another random 9 people off the street then walk into my house, we can all take our masks off.
I think from a health point of view you should be wearing them in a private residence, they just acknowledge it's an impossible thing to police.
And that's again a disaster from a public health point of view but there's just not a lot we can legally do about it.I'm lucky to wear pants in my private residence, let alone a mask.
And that's again a disaster from a pubic health point of view but there's just not a lot we can legally do about it.
I've noticed a huge change in attitude this time around. I think the shock of lockdowns have worn off a bit and people seem to be seeing through the bullshit contradictory rules a lot more. I've had a couple of meetings with different businesses where they were still in the office and no-one could be ****ed wearing a mask (I was on zoom but could see what was happening on their end), and I'm seeing them coming off a lot more around the place in public as well. Things like these crazy new guidelines don't help at all, there are more holes in them than North Melbourne's defensive zone.Yeah, I'm a bit flippant about it all but I think it's really difficult - you have to draw lines somewhere and they will always end up somewhat arbitrary.
I'm 100% sure that's their approach too.Pretty sure the government is relying on enough people doing the right thing that in the unlikely event we have missed someone Covid positive spread will be more limited than if there were no restrictions, so if you want to set a bad example for everyone go for it but don't pretend it's righteous.