Remove this Banner Ad

CricInfo Alltime World XI

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

1 too many all-rounders though..maybe replace Sobers with someone like Kallis/Tendulkar?


Reasonable observation. However considering Sobers averages MORE with the bat than both Kallis and Tendulkar, I will keep him!

My rationale is that Sobers is playing as a batsman who can bowl as well, and Hadlee is a bowler who can bat. Imran is my true all-rounder.

I like the attack variation of

Ambrose
Hadlee
Imran
Wasim
Warne
Sobers
 
This is almost as bad as people playing McGrath is the side above players such as Akram, Marshall, Hadlee and Spofforth.
.

You need to go through and look at Mcgrath's record over the journey. He played at a time when Bat was dominating Ball and his stats are head and shoulders above anyone in his era, and are superior to all those you list except Marshall.
 
You need to go through and look at Mcgrath's record over the journey. He played at a time when Bat was dominating Ball and his stats are head and shoulders above anyone in his era, and are superior to all those you list except Marshall.
I never said he was not. He was a brilliant bowler and one of the better bowlers of modern times. Using stats though is being a bit single minded as stats can deceive. For example in the case of McGrath how many of his wickets do you put down to Warne bowling up the other end? You cannot ignore that may have helped to some extent. Then even in modern times keeping that in mind you have guys like Shaun Pollock and Allan Donnald as 2 randoms who would have scored buck loads more wickets with Warne down the other end.

As I said though I am not saying he was not brilliant. Just your arguement of using stats to justify is being a bit single minded.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I never said he was not. He was a brilliant bowler and one of the better bowlers of modern times. Using stats though is being a bit single minded as stats can deceive. For example in the case of McGrath how many of his wickets do you put down to Warne bowling up the other end? You cannot ignore that may have helped to some extent. Then even in modern times keeping that in mind you have guys like Shaun Pollock and Allan Donnald as 2 randoms who would have scored buck loads more wickets with Warne down the other end.

As I said though I am not saying he was not brilliant. Just your arguement of using stats to justify is being a bit single minded.

I dispute this partly because Mcgrath and Warne didn't bowl that many overs with the other working the other end - Mcgrath took many more higher order wickets which he got working with Gillepse and co.

He only played 20 tests without Warne, his stats are roughly comparible.

http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine...volve_type=none;template=results;type=bowling

added to this, you list Marshall as one of the greats... its fair to say he played with a reasonably good attack during his times!
 
How did McGrath go when Warne was injured or suspended?

Shithouse?
As I said I am not a stats man but to please the masses I looked this up on cricketinfo. McGrath finished his career with the superb average of 21.64. However during the period Warne was suspended his bowling average was 35.25. He then went back to averaging about 19 as soon as Warne came back into the side.
 
As I said I am not a stats man but to please the masses I looked this up on cricketinfo. McGrath finished his career with the superb average of 21.64. However during the period Warne was suspended his bowling average was 35.25. He then went back to averaging about 19 as soon as Warne came back into the side.

stats disagree with you.
 
YOUR TEAM
OPENERS
Gordon Greenidge
Virender Sehwag

MIDDLE ORDER
Sachin Tendulkar
Sir Donald Bradman
Sir Viv Richards

ALLROUNDERS
Imran Khan
Sir Garry Sobers

WICKETKEEPER
Adam Gilchrist

BOWLERS
Curtly Ambrose
Shane Warne
Wasim Akram
 
Jack Hobbs
Herb Sutcliffe
Don Bradman
Viv Richards
Sachin Tendulkar
Garry Sobers
Adam Gilchrist
Wasim Akram
Malcolm Marshall
Shane Warne
Glenn McGrath
 
Miller > imran khan.

as a bowler and a batsman IMO.

Besides if khan is selected miller would probably come down in his mosquito and bomb the bejesus out of khan with cricket balls :D

THe brits had to make up people in their adventure war comics because they had no one as big as miller :thumbsu:

bomb berlin, opera with the princess, poker with the boys, dine and a tumble with the duchess before midnight, and up in time to bowl the imperial XI out for under a 100 :thumbsu:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Wasim Akram- that was what true swing bowling was about. The closest "swing" I have seen is from Zaheer Khan but he does not swing it anywhere near as much as Wasim did and its more reverse swing.

If only there were more genuine swing bowlers in world cricket.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Team just announced on Cricinfo:

"The World XI: Jack Hobbs, Len Hutton, Don Bradman, Sachin Tendulkar, Viv Richards, Garry Sobers, Adam Gilchrist, Malcolm Marshall, Shane Warne, Wasim Akram, Dennis Lillee"

http://www.cricinfo.com/magazine/content/current/story/482936.html

I can never understand why Herb Sutcliffe never seems to get a gig in these best 11 sides, the bloke averaged 60+ as an opening batsman, a figure that has never been matched by any opener ever.
As for Wasim, he surely has to be an automatic selection, his career figures prove that. How much batting would he have to do in this lineup anyway?
 
I never said he was not. He was a brilliant bowler and one of the better bowlers of modern times. Using stats though is being a bit single minded as stats can deceive. For example in the case of McGrath how many of his wickets do you put down to Warne bowling up the other end? You cannot ignore that may have helped to some extent. Then even in modern times keeping that in mind you have guys like Shaun Pollock and Allan Donnald as 2 randoms who would have scored buck loads more wickets with Warne down the other end.

As I said though I am not saying he was not brilliant. Just your arguement of using stats to justify is being a bit single minded.
How did Warne go when he didnt have McGrath putting the pressure on down the other end?

How did our other quicks go when McGrath wasnt there?

McGrath set the standard for our dominant period, held the attack together for years. That his averaged peaked at about 21 after the first Ashes test of 05 says alot about his durability. He didnt ever really fully recover after stepping on that ball IMO, wasnt the same bowler afterwards, but his performances for years were brilliant.

I think Lillie is pretty lucky to make the side, when the likes of Hadlee and Ambrose in particular, and also McGrath, miss out.
 
jesus christ , how did Lillee get in there ?? :eek:


I would've thought Glenn McGrath would get a game ahead of Lillee, although Lillee averaged 23.9 McGrath managed to average 21.6 playing at a time where batsman and flat pitches reigned supreme.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom