I have just seen Sanders telling someone to count the 3 first rounders Cats gave to GWS for JC (ie bagging the Crows again over Danger). Now can’t find his post - perhaps he has pulled another one of his posts after realising he has left himself exposed here. Personally so sick to death focussing on something from 7 years ago and living in the past. It reminds me of some of my rellies and friends in Adelaide failing to be able to “move on” - something coincidentally I have never found living in many other places but that seems to occur with regular occurrence on this forum.
I would love to see Sanders and his wannabe cronies let this one go and hopefully the following can put it to bed - for good.
Now unless my after work cocktails (wouldn’t rule it out) are seriously impacting here - in which case I will certainly claim lack of capacity - the Crows got HIGHER value for Danger than GWS did for Cameron. Do the sums on the AFL draft calculator. We got 9 and 28. GWS got 13, 15 and 20 but gave up 24 and 27. And if anything earlier picks are relatively undervalued in many peoples eyes in reality.
Will very patiently await your response here Colonel and please don’t ignore being found out like you were a few days ago by not responding and just hoping things go away.
cats gave the equivalent of pick 7 for Cameron (13, 15, 20 out and 24 and 27 back in along with Jezza)
cats gave the equivalent of pick 4 for Danger (9 and 28)
SO WE GOT MORE FOR DANGER THAN GWS DID FOR CAMERON!!!!!!!!!! Well strike me pink. Who would have thought.
Your argument and constant criticism here along with your wannabe cronies has been completely and utterly debunked. Furthermore there is no doubt in recent years that HIGHER COMPENSATION is being received for players leaving even further adding to the Crows case here. And as we all realise we were the first club to force compensation for a free agent. Would I have liked 2 first rounders from Cats? Of course. Did we do as well as GWS did - bloody oath based on the numbers.
A genuine request to please respond Samders, STO and other cronies. It’s the manly thing to do.
I would love to see Sanders and his wannabe cronies let this one go and hopefully the following can put it to bed - for good.
Now unless my after work cocktails (wouldn’t rule it out) are seriously impacting here - in which case I will certainly claim lack of capacity - the Crows got HIGHER value for Danger than GWS did for Cameron. Do the sums on the AFL draft calculator. We got 9 and 28. GWS got 13, 15 and 20 but gave up 24 and 27. And if anything earlier picks are relatively undervalued in many peoples eyes in reality.
Will very patiently await your response here Colonel and please don’t ignore being found out like you were a few days ago by not responding and just hoping things go away.
cats gave the equivalent of pick 7 for Cameron (13, 15, 20 out and 24 and 27 back in along with Jezza)
cats gave the equivalent of pick 4 for Danger (9 and 28)
SO WE GOT MORE FOR DANGER THAN GWS DID FOR CAMERON!!!!!!!!!! Well strike me pink. Who would have thought.
Your argument and constant criticism here along with your wannabe cronies has been completely and utterly debunked. Furthermore there is no doubt in recent years that HIGHER COMPENSATION is being received for players leaving even further adding to the Crows case here. And as we all realise we were the first club to force compensation for a free agent. Would I have liked 2 first rounders from Cats? Of course. Did we do as well as GWS did - bloody oath based on the numbers.
A genuine request to please respond Samders, STO and other cronies. It’s the manly thing to do.