Yes he did, and if that's the case I'm not happy jan
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement. -
AFLW 2025 - the Finals - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING
- Thread starter Tex Support
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Not 'happy' either but better than compo - weakens Geelong at least. Should inc 2016 first rounder but am used to being shafted.
Well that pretty much rules out 9 and Murdoch then.
But that is what I've been saying all along. Adelaide will not receive compensation on the same level as the Judd trade. We don't have - but wouldn't trade even if we did - a player of Josh Kennedy's ilk. The closest to pick #3 we have is #9 and the closest we have to pick #20 will probably end up in the early 30s after all of the other comp picks are handed out.
If a trade happens, and it's two draft picks and a player, it'll probably be our first this year #9, our second next year (with its value dependant entirely upon where we finish on the ladder in 2016) plus George Horlin-Smith. I see Hyphen as the most dispensable of our contracted and uninjured players, and he's also a South Aussie. So unless you draft another Dangerfield with pick #9, I don't see how you guys can win.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I get the feeling that they may have been as deluded as many of their supporters thinking that, "no ones matched yet, the Crows can't match because he's been a loyal servant for 8 years, their coach died and he wants to go home for family reasons, it would be the end of RFA, so they can't and won't match under those circumstances".
I will be f**ked off if we got Pick 9 and Murdoch....
I would take 2 first rounders
I would take 2 first rounders
Look dude, giving us Dangerfield isn't enough compensation for us to take Mackay off your hands! The guy is a terribly inconsistent footballer. How he got the contract he did is beyond incomprehensible - it actually defied all logic! I've seen him play about three good games in total.crows may be required to hand over a later pick or if you are trading next years 1st that doesn't effect you this year anyway in terms of list numbers so nothing to see
an eg may be crows get 2 first rounders , cats get danger and a 3rd or 4th rounder / or mackay
- Oct 8, 2012
- 16,281
- 19,964
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yep, this sums up Mckays career.
What would Murdoch get if he was traded? Probably a late second round pick. Not good enough. 2 firsts mininum
Actually he is consistent, consistently terrible.
Apparently he and Danger are best mates, so it's a package deal.
Smithtastic33
Cancelled
- Sep 21, 2015
- 323
- 216
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
But that is not our problem. It's yours, if you want dangerfield, you need to find the assets to trade.
You can not go to the shop and want a pie and say, I only have $1.20 so give it to me anyway. Or you can not say, I have a $50 note but I don't want to break it, so sell me the pie anyway for the scraps I have in my pocket.
You need to get creative to make a deal happen or get disappointed when a trade doesn't happen.
I'm used to bring left without anything from crap trades, one more wont change anything.
Pdub
Norm Smith Medallist
Minimum will be 2015 first pick plus 2016 first pick. The AFC is after outside run and key defenders, Geelong doesn't have any of quality that will be offered up. a GHS will only be part of the deal as steak knives if he asks to return home.
He had the pill 36 times. Easy to see why the umpires would see that as 3 votes.
Smithtastic33
Cancelled
- Sep 21, 2015
- 323
- 216
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
What the hell is 'chutzpah'?
All valid questions which can't possibly be answered with so little facts. I guess once everything unfolds, everything will become a little clearer. As flippant as that answer is, anything else would be wild assumptions.
One was this year when your late coach publicly acknowledged his efforts. The other two were interspersed over the last six-years he's been on your list. But you didn't need me to answer that as you were being facetious.
Hmmmm me not so much.
In fact I think I'd take that. I think Murdock goes OK and should improve. Only 23 and 190 cm.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
You have not!
Balls
I will respecfully diagree. Something is only worth what someone is willing to pay. Dangerfield wants to leave Adelaide and ONLY wants Geelong. Adelaide has lost significant leverage given that fact. He's a F/A who wants to come home for family reasons, so while that isn't Adelaide's problem and doesn't preclude them from their rights to match given the restricted component of Danger's F/A situation, Adelaide really only has one buyer.
The AFL and the Player's Association will not let Adelaide demand a ridiculously unreasonable compensation package and will put pressure on Adelaide to accept something which is reasonable given ALL of the facts. Pick #9 this year plus steak knives (GHS) and next year's second rounder is smack bang in the middle of pick #14 compensation and what you guys on here are baying for.
Rowie reads this board
Horlin Smith shouldn't be discussed with us.
We have a huge abundance of inside midfielders
We have a huge abundance of inside midfielders
Deaneus!
We Await Silent Tristero's Empire
Bullshit, he can't read.
Similar threads
- Poll
