Remove this Banner Ad

David Warner

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think the article tells us more about the author than it does Warner. The author sounds a bit soft for competitive cricket. Should spend his time concentrating on his game than worrying what people are saying to him.

Half his piece is tongue in cheek. When you’re talking about ‘being alphad’ during a handshake you know it’s not supposed to be winning a Pulitzer.

When I had to report on games I played, I deliberately talked down anything of note that I ever did - ‘scratched and edged his way to 70’ ‘managed to make 43 despite being made look foolish by most of the opposition attack’ etc. it didn’t make me too soft for competition.

I just didn’t want to talk myself up and make a bigger target of myself than already necessary.
 
Sounds like a The Grade Cricketer wannabe

The Grade Cricketer boys used to write for FoxSports and are now under the Betoota umbrella, you can tell that Fox is desperate for something like it with articles like this rubbish.
 
Half his piece is tongue in cheek. When you’re talking about ‘being alphad’ during a handshake you know it’s not supposed to be winning a Pulitzer.

When I had to report on games I played, I deliberately talked down anything of note that I ever did - ‘scratched and edged his way to 70’ ‘managed to make 43 despite being made look foolish by most of the opposition attack’ etc. it didn’t make me too soft for competition.

I just didn’t want to talk myself up and make a bigger target of myself than already necessary.
The humble brag is strong in this one.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Does anybody know what was said exactly? I will wait until I hear what was said to him before I judge him. It could be a case of Warner not being able to take what he gives out or it could be another playing crossing the line.

"My OLED that you sold me has burn in now you **** ".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If he left the field of play is he allowed back on to continue his innings, timed out maybe? Regardless though, what a f***ing plum.

There was initially some confusion because once a batsman has left the field of play, they are unable to return to the crease - unless they are returning after having retired hurt. However, news.com.au understands Western Suburbs players allowed Warner to return because they did not want him to be dismissed in such a fashion.

https://www.foxsports.com.au/cricke...e/news-story/b85c1510a46fdb9419fffbb66472ad06

*retired hurt (feelings)
 
Does anybody know what was said exactly? I will wait until I hear what was said to him before I judge him. It could be a case of Warner not being able to take what he gives out or it could be another playing crossing the line.

Yeah I agree with this. My initial reaction is that Warner is a sook that can dish it out, but can't take it when it's dished back. But we really need to know what was said before saying too much. If it was something that was clearly over the line, then my opinion may well be that Warner acted admirably by not retaliating.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Did they ask him about any plans to fix the ball?

If it was personal about family then it's not on.

If its about cheating and getting caught, fair call
 
I honestly can't understand all the hatred and anger directed towards Warner. He's not the first campaigner to play for Australia. He's not the biggest campaigner to play for Australia and he won't be the last campaigner to play for Australia.

Have a like for the fine use of 'campaigner' as a rhetorical device.
 
If he left the field of play is he allowed back on to continue his innings, timed out maybe? Regardless though, what a f***ing plum.
I think it went in the scorebook as "Retired - feelings hurt" meaning he was allowed to return.

At least this time he didn't just go to the races because his team was fielding. Since becoming a celebrity, he doesn't have a great record in his rare club appearances.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom