Dima17 - Phantom Draft (First+ Second RD's). FINAL COPY!

[Enviable Tradition]

Yep, I'll refer to a previous post of mine



My opinion hasn't changed, why would Port use picks 8 or 9 or 16 on a 17 or 18 year old ruckman this coming draft?

+1. So many of these phantom drafts seem to have made the same assumptions. I could be wrong but I very much doubt we will list another ruckman. I think we will mature age rookie one just in case Brogan goes down though. I.e. Miekljohn (sic).

 

[dima17]

Thats the beauty of these things, they are just guesses.

 

[swannies]

If the eagles take 3 WA boys, they never have in the past, they take best available early, then I will go he!

Also, this is just me being very pedantic and after I've read wrong information I usually lose interest, but Lewis Jetta is from Swan Districts not Peel.

 

[On the bench]

Think this one of the more accurate mock drafts,hope Melbournes picks turn out this way!

 

[DaVe86]

I just put a phantom draft up with what I believe I would do if I were the selectors. But I openly admitted that it is not what will eventuate.


If I were to do a draft with what I predict will happen, it would look identical to yours.

Excellent work, I think you'll get very close to the top 20


EDit: But i have to agree with an earlier poster...Port will not go a ruckman...I think they'll look for a forward at 16.

 

[dima17]

thanks dave

yer ive changed my views on that too since this was posted. i think we also nowknow that ball will be at essendon with pick 26 so for all those essendon supporters whingingabout how i gave them two talls where they may only need one... just replace one with ball.