Fair enough. I don't claim to be very knowledgable with regards to potential draftee's, but I too was disappointed when we passed up on more highly touted players such as Colyer to draft Weedon.Yes I do .
I remember hearing about three weeks out from the draft that WC were going to take Weedon and I must say that the news surprised me as I did not rate him at the 22/23 mark. My dissapointment of selecting Weedon come draft day was negated by the fact I was over the moon that Koby Stevens had landed at the Eagles. And yes I felt Weedon was at best a 30+ draft selection. I was told that Collingwood had looked at him @ 30 but that was before Ball became available.. the rest is history.
As a Claremont supporter I had seen both him and Colyer play and I rated Colyer much, much higher. We needed an injection of raw pace and I still believe that Colyer would have been a very good pick up. I also watched Weedon play at the championship and was not that impressed. I still think that both Colyer and Mitch Duncan would have been a better selection @ 22.
That aside he is an Eagle now and I want Weedon to be a success and make it .. but thus far I still have my doubts. I hope I am wrong and I will be the first to put my hand up and admit that I was wrong... in fact I would be wraped if I had to do that as it would mean that the selection had been vindicated.
I also rated Black , Carlisle, Duncan, Bartlett and Crichton as being much better players than Weedon.
I can assure you that I am not just saying so with the benefit of hindsight as swannies and I had some long conversations on the matter.
We were both dissapointed that Black and Duncan slipped through our clutches.
Having said that, the more I've seen of him the more impressed I am. His inside work is fantastic the way he finds space and releases players, and he's a very smooth mover on the outside



