- Joined
- Nov 1, 2012
- Posts
- 40,199
- Reaction score
- 62,733
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
When are we having our annual big footy awards, I would like a new category, ******** of the Year......
I don't think we need to wait to anoint the victor
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

When are we having our annual big footy awards, I would like a new category, ******** of the Year......
West AdelaideMilera has been linked to GC for a long while now ......still strong possibilityI think Curnow will still go top 7 so he won't be available. Milera I'm hoping.
13 it really is a large group. Wait and see I guess.
West AdelaideTo Carlton if someone snaps up Mckay early.I think Curnow will still go top 7 so he won't be available. Milera I'm hoping.
13 it really is a large group. Wait and see I guess.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Milera and Collins is likely and I think that'd be a good result for us.My fault didn't make it super clear.
Fingers crossed for Milera and Burton/Collins/Mckay
Can't help but feel that Cam has gone the old "will pick SA players" approach with us. Milera makes sense and he rightly point out that overlooking Curnow will take some balls.
I have voiced my concerns on Burton a number of times. He scares the shit out of me and I wouldn't have the guts to pick him. Talent wise be is a steal at 9 let alone 13 but that knee worries me in a major way and we simply cannot afford to get this draft wrong. We simply MUST pick 2 stars and 200 game players.
If we draft Burton I will trust the rectuiting guys but it doesn't mean that I won't have heart in my mouth every time he flies up for a mark or gets tackled. But if it pays off **** ME.....JACKPOT!
Agree Vader that a good inside mid is a need, but who do you suggest we take? Mathieson is the one that prob will be available, but will he be good enough? Tough to answer, but i think the exposed form of players in other areas (i.e. Milera + Collins), will lead to us picking these types, and look at next year to find a better inside option than a Mathieson...Here's the problem...
That leaves Sloane, Douglas and Matt Crouch. Sloane & Douglas are both high quality, but neither are primarily inside midfielders. Both are adept at playing that role, but they're not monster clearance winners in the same class as Dangerfield & Thompson. Matt Crouch is primarily an inside midfielder, but he's still a significant step down from what Dangerfield & Thompson provided.
- Brad Crouch is perpetually injured. Who knows if/when he'll be able to run to a centre bounce without injuring himself.
- Thompson is likely to retire at the end of 2016.
- CEY, Grigg, Lyons are all quantity - not quality.
- Gore is a complete unknown at this stage.
To put this into context, here are the league rankings & averages for clearances in 2015:
7th - Scott Thompson - 7.19 (clearances per game)
8th - Patrick Dangerfield - 7.17
54th - Rory Sloane - 4.33
58th - Richard Douglas - 4.19
60th - Cam Ellis-Yolmen - 4.09
64th - Matt Crouch - 3.94
100+ - Jarryd Lyons - 2.85
The gulf in class, when it comes to clearances, between Thompson/Dangerfield and the rest of our list, is as wide as the Pacific Ocean.
Long on quantity... desperately short on quality.
We're not drafting another tall defender surely?
Dangerfield gone, Thompson on his last legs, doubts over B Crouch's durability.
Surely to goodness we're taking the two best midfielders we can.
We hear a lot about how Franklin, Selwood and Judd successfully overcome their pre-draft injury concerns. But are there any players who have failed due to pre-existing injuries rather than just not being up to it?
West AdelaideEventually, gives a young forward a few years to develop.
Jenkins is an interesting one, absolute spud at the start of the year (most on here wanted him dropped), then seemed to pull it together towards the end of the year. Could be a really important indicator for how you go next year.
Get right in!Twomey had been strong on Milera being a flight risk for interstate clubs since the interview stage. Now names us taking him at 9.
Get the fukk in
Twomey had been strong on Milera being a flight risk for interstate clubs since the interview stage. Now names us taking him at 9.
Get the fukk in

If he is such a flight risk then he should be available at 13 as well!Twomey had been strong on Milera being a flight risk for interstate clubs since the interview stage. Now names us taking him at 9.
Get the fukk in

West AdelaideAnd if Weideman's athletic testing is so bad to overlook him at #3 ......then why pick him at #7?If he is such a flight risk then he should be available at 13 as well!![]()
If he is such a flight risk then he should be available at 13 as well!![]()
If Curnow was a lock at #3 a week ago ....how is it that he's a possibility for us now at #9?
