- Joined
- Oct 3, 2003
- Posts
- 26,916
- Reaction score
- 30,913
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Soft spot for Brisbane
If you put Wigg in there, surely McGovern is there as well?
If Wigg is 13th most likely to be delisted, McGovern is 14th
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Hawthorn v Western Bulldogs - Rd 13 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Hawks at 68% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 13 Games
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 13
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
If you put Wigg in there, surely McGovern is there as well?
For possibly the 500th time this off season, we're not going to delist contracted players, so stop suggesting it. Here are the candidates
Struck out the only ones that are 100% not a part of this conversation, barring utter catastrophe. Everyone else there is at risk, some more than others - Harry Dear f.ex is now our third choice, first backup KPF with Jpod gone, and the only alternative with McGovern more a third up type. I'd expect us not to draft tall again until next year, but even if we do go tall this year he's probably safe for another 2 year deal, though not necessarily so if he has a dog of a year in the SANFL.
Anyone in the category "half back flanker slash outside mid" by virtue of pace or kick is also on notice thanks to trade week, that includes Grigg, Wigg and Jaensch. It would also include Mackay if not for that idiotic contract we're now stuck with, so the only thing at risk for him is spending the last 3 years of that deal in the SANFL.
If we draft a new inside mid with 9 or 13 this year, it's essentially the end of Lyons at Adelaide, even though I do expect Thompson to retire, and van Berlo to be 50/50 at this stage. If the next draft class pans out as predicted I can see us making as many as four live picks, perhaps even five if we trade well.

Pretty much what I meant to say was I hope we get Milera and I'm hopeful that God's sensibilities are such that by invoking him in a potentially negative fashion he will engineer such outcome so as not to forsake his believers
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Read an article somewhere that Balic when asked about moving interstate if drafted outside Victoria how he'd handle it said something like " We are a very close family but I THINK I'll be OK with it".....alarm bells started going off right then for me.
Is this going to be an issue when bidding for ben Jarman. Is that next year?We've already given up our 2nd round pick for next year[/QUOTE
Sounds like draft tampering to me... What if one of the SA boys like Milera said that.....
When are these players going to realise that it is a national game, if you want to get drafted and play AFL you have to accept that it may not be in your home state. Hope he goes to a WA team...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And also there is actually no such things as those positions in modern day football anyway ...there are different forward set ups with talls deep and high etcteams never line up as they are named FFS.
Luke Thompson played CHB in that game
No chance of Melbourne taking Collins. They've got some very talented young KPDs, defence is the least of their problems.My updated phantom: to get this thread back on track, minus academy players.
1. Weitering - carlton
2. Schache - brisbane
3. Weideman - melbourne
4. Parish - essendon
5. Curnow - essendon
6. Oliver - gold coast
7. Collins - melbourne
8. Mckay - carlton
9. Francis - adelaide
10. *gws
11. Burton - carlton
12. Gresham - richmond
13. Milera - adelaide
Port was an example, the point is you are not just spooling brisbanes party and stopping them getting a bonus. Anything you take from Brisbane goes to a club further up the ladder, so why help a club that is in a better position to spite Brisbane, when we gain nothing. If Brisbane can't afford the bid you will get a player who will resent you for stealing him away from his family because he had been told he had a free pass to stay.
Next years draft is full of mids. This is the year teams are going to look for kpp. Essendon, melbourne and carlton are all in need of kpp. Pick 3 is critical. If melbourne go for weideman or curnow essendon will take parish at 4 and then the kpp melbourne didnt take. Melbourne last year drafted petracca and brayshaw they also have viney, tyson, vince, jones and trengove. They could go parish but i think their move up the order is to gain a kpf to partner hogan as they lack in this area. They have kpd in mcdonald and garland who plays tall/small but after losing frawley they are limited in options. If its true about milera and francis being flight risks i cant see these 3 clubs choosing them over oliverNo chance of Melbourne taking Collins. They've got some very talented young KPDs, defence is the least of their problems.
Can't see either of Francis or Milera getting through. Francis to Essendon, Milera to GC, who are well covered for inside mids and unlikely to take Oliver.
You do realise Sando is the under 18s AIS academy coach. He would have much more knowledge than most. Probably only behind the recruiters (in terms of knowledge of the players).
He may not have a great idea of who the clubs will select though.
He spent 3 years in AFC list management meetings and is the coach of the AIS squad, I'd say on the subject of who we will draft he would know more than anybody on this board, unless there are people who have been in our list management meetings after Sando was sacked.
Wingard was pretty open about the fact that he didn't want to go interstate...actually was blunt about it. Always wonder why we don't encourage more of the SA boys to do it
Apparently rioli interviewed badly to interstate clubs. He was doing his schooling in melbourne and had settled there after leaving the territory. Hawthorn said to him if he was there at their pick they would take him. The idea of playing with buddy wouldve been appealing too. However we had a strong team and had some great indigenous leaders in mcleod and johncock. Disappointed we didnt take the punt on him and back our people in to make him stay here. Patrick left anyway.Wasn't Rioli very very blunt about his desire to stay in Melbourne?
It's only draft tampering when the AFL want it to be...
Baby steps mate!The bidding on Academy players makes the draft a bit more interesting, but the AFL need to bite the bullet and allow draft day trades.
Imagine a bid on an academy player followed by 5 minutes of extreme trading! If you could trade picks, future picks and just drafted players, it would make the whole event seriously exciting!!
Imagine Melbourne draft Weidemann - the one player the Crows are desperate for. We draft Francis and Melbourne had drafted Milera as well. We turn to Melbourne before our last pick and swap our pick 13 and Francis for Weidemann, then effectively using our pick 13 for whoever Melbourne want - which was H McKay.
Melbourne swap Weidemann for McKay and Francis. They walk away with McKay, Francis and Milera. We get the player we wanted most - Weidemann.
It can only happen IF the picks work in a certain order and if McKay is available at pick 13, but you don't know until the pick is about to occur - hence the need for draft day trades.
Now, before everyone shouts me down about giving up Francis and McKay for Weidemann, it is just an example of how the draft day trade could work, not what I would actually do.
I get that it was a hypoyhetical. But that specific example would be a horrible outcome for AFC.The bidding on Academy players makes the draft a bit more interesting, but the AFL need to bite the bullet and allow draft day trades.
Imagine a bid on an academy player followed by 5 minutes of extreme trading! If you could trade picks, future picks and just drafted players, it would make the whole event seriously exciting!!
Imagine Melbourne draft Weidemann - the one player the Crows are desperate for. We draft Francis and Melbourne had drafted Milera as well. We turn to Melbourne before our last pick and swap our pick 13 and Francis for Weidemann, then effectively using our pick 13 for whoever Melbourne want - which was H McKay.
Melbourne swap Weidemann for McKay and Francis. They walk away with McKay, Francis and Milera. We get the player we wanted most - Weidemann.
It can only happen IF the picks work in a certain order and if McKay is available at pick 13, but you don't know until the pick is about to occur - hence the need for draft day trades.
Now, before everyone shouts me down about giving up Francis and McKay for Weidemann, it is just an example of how the draft day trade could work, not what I would actually do.
Baby steps mate!
NBA have this concept and it makes for an exciting draft experience from viewer's perspective but AFL just introduced future pick trading. Next step is trading future picks that are more than a yea in advance and bringing in the restrictions on those picks (e.g. Adelaide traded next year's 2nd round draft pick and could have had top 30 protection on it and the protection reduces on it for the following year if the pick did not get passed to GWS).
I get that it was a hypoyhetical. But that specific example would be a horrible outcome for AFC.
But I agree, WHEN live trading during draft night occurs it will be amazing.
Apparently rioli interviewed badly to interstate clubs. He was doing his schooling in melbourne and had settled there after leaving the territory. Hawthorn said to him if he was there at their pick they would take him. The idea of playing with buddy wouldve been appealing too. However we had a strong team and had some great indigenous leaders in mcleod and johncock. Disappointed we didnt take the punt on him and back our people in to make him stay here. Patrick left anyway.
20% discount too isn't itNo, cos we can just pay with our 3rd pick.
