Remove this Banner Ad

News EFC asks AFL and ASADA for probe into own training regime part II

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Richard Ings is such a hack. Every time I hear from him I am amazed at the extent to which he is prepared to continue to fuel this issue on the basis of very, very little. He continues to interpret information he is provided with in the most unreasonably negative way.

It is clear that the "little bit outside the code" comment is being used by Dank to say that he wasn't giving anyone steroids, HGH or other illegal products. Ings knows very well that there are degrees of effectiveness as far as the performance enhancing aspect of a substance is concerned so there are a number of way he could have interpreted the comment that didn't require him to channel Caroline Wilson.

I have to say though it is unbelievably stupid of anyone on our coaching staff to be taking substances banned by WADA while at the club (if that is what Dank is saying happened). It is ridiculous to provide ASADA with reason to bring unwanted attention to our club.

I couldn't understand why Danks made this admission - It adds fuel to the fire.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Nothing, WADA guidelines dont stem to coaches.
What about this?

11.6 Possession of Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods.
(a) Possession by a Player In-Competition of any Prohibited Method or any
Prohibited Substance, or Possession by a Player Out-of-Competition of any
Prohibited Method or Prohibited Substance that is prohibited Out-ofCompetition unless the Player establishes that the Possession is pursuant to
a Therapeutic Use Exemption granted in accordance with Clause 10
(Therapeutic Use) or other acceptable justification.
14
(b) Possession by an Official In-Competition of any Prohibited Method or any
Prohibited Substance, or Possession by an Official Out-of-Competition of
any Prohibited Method of any Prohibited Substance that is prohibited Outof-Competition in connection with a Player or training, unless the Offici
 
So what are the possible ramifications of the coaches taking WADA banned substances?

We just end up looking a bit dodgy, but frankly that ship has sailed, so the ramification of that revelation in itself is absolutely naught
 
As I said at the time, McVeigh could have made this inference without using the disgruntled player card though. A massive misstep.

Did you listen to the interview ?

McVeigh was giving his version of events and Ox intervened and asked ' Why is your version different to Reimers ' - Then McVeigh responded - McVeigh probably went a bit hard and was pointing out that Reimer's was so unprofessional his version of events couldn't be trusted.

It's not like McVeigh started the interview potting Reimers.
 
Healy and Caro off the long run on 3AW.

Healy complained about lack of detail in the 7.30 IV with Dank. Bear in mind the TV segment was 17 minutes out of a two hour interview. Wonder whether he will the reported onto Sports Tonight.

Caro going on about governance at EFC. An erudite caller made Caro back-down and suggest that she thinks that Hird will survive.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The mud comment is complete bullshit.

As for the rest of it. Do you really give a **** what those people say and more importantly do you really think what these people believe, in light of a complete exoneration, will tarnish the club irreversibly forever?

To a degree, the success and viability of the footy club depends on its perception in the wider world - e.g. for sponsorships, attracting new members, attracting free agent players, etc.

It's sad but inevitably some will always see this as a black mark against the bombers, regardless of how it pans out. Hopefully that's only a small proportion - who we don't want having anything to do with the bombers anyway - and the rest will actually treat the issue on its merits.
 
To a degree, the success and viability of the footy club depends on its perception in the wider world - e.g. for sponsorships, attracting new members, attracting free agent players, etc.

It's sad but inevitably some will always see this as a black mark against the bombers, regardless of how it pans out. Hopefully that's only a small proportion - who we don't want having anything to do with the bombers anyway - and the rest will actually treat the issue on its merits.

Exactly right, except I think only the minority will treat the issue on its merits. To many have based their view on what the media has told them and think if we are guilty no matter what.
 
Did I read somewhere the invoice was dated jan 2013
dank got tonked off in september 3 days after the last game
could of been ripping us off
 
Why would Dank bring the coaches into it about them taking drugs?
He never said they took drugs, he said they took suppliments that werent inside wada guidelines. Nothing illegal, coachs can take what they like. It was the media that said the coaches took drugs. The stupid asshats.
 
I couldn't understand why Danks made this admission - It adds fuel to the fire.
Why would Dank bring the coaches into it about them taking drugs?

I think it's a good thing he did, shows he isn't hiding anything and it's better to come from him than from the flogs in the media finding out later on.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You won't do shit

orly.jpg


You are new, so I will that slip through to the keeper. I guess you haven't worked out how people are on here just yet. Of course they wont turn up despite giving them an open invitation to tomorrow or even Thursday at Pies training. But i will speak, speak how I feel no matter who is there.

i said they better watch out if they are there, I never said what Id do if they were. Something will be done.
 
orly.jpg


You are new, so I will that slip through to the keeper. I guess you haven't worked out how people are on here just yet. Of course they wont turn up despite giving them an open invitation to tomorrow or even Thursday at Pies training. But i will speak, speak how I feel no matter who is there.

i said they better watch out if they are there, I never said what Id do if they were. Something will be done.

Admire the passion, but I honestly believe Caro and Barrett in particular are beyond redemption. They are both basically faux moralistic, real life trolls who will just denounce you as being hurt by home truths, or something similar. Don't even give them the satisfaction of the attention, the attention just massages their already huge egos.

Honestly, if I held hope of being able to hold anything better than a patronising conversation with any of them, it'd be The Pint.
 
I'm not really enjoying the "DIRTY ROTTEN CHEATS" graphic with red text on a black background in the HUN. Crossing the line, aren't they?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top