Remove this Banner Ad

Science/Environment Explaining evolution and natural selection.

  • Thread starter Thread starter M Malice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nevertheless....It's still dependent upon the perfectly aligned set of preconditional circumstances on earth. Regardless of how many times life has supposedly emerged, it's still the same petrie-dish & it still doesn't explain mankind's consciousness.
consciousness? is merely a state of self awareness and having sentience/imagination/problem solving capacity/empathy to name a few, i fail to see how these could not all be a function of an evolved brain.

http://www.livescience.com/39481-time-to-declare-animal-sentience.html
 
consciousness? is merely a state of self awareness and having sentience/imagination/problem solving capacity/empathy to name a few, i fail to see how these could not all be a function of an evolved brain.

http://www.livescience.com/39481-time-to-declare-animal-sentience.html

I've got no issue with sentience Jason....But do animals have a conscience?

What is it, that distinguishes mankind from the animal kingdom?....And how do we account for that difference in evolutionary theory?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Sensing the predator in the tall grass.

The animal just pisses off and doesn't have the brain capacity to apply that extra layer of imagination.

The human runs off then thinks... hang on there is nothing there. Why did I think there was something there? Where did that feeling of another presence come from? It MUST be something because I am me and I know what I know: and what I know is that SOMETHING was in that tall grass. I thought of my dead uncle this morning. Maybe it was him telling me he is watching over me? If that is it... where does he live? How did he get there? Who are his friends in this other world? Who leads his tribe?

What does he know that I don't know? How can I use this to get more food and a better wife?
Yet another example of man's stupidity. We should never have left the trees. My back hurts.
 
Nailed it.:thumbsu:
Even faux knowledge is power....
Alternatively: I need to know more. I will give my wife and some of my food to whoever is wise enough to guide me.
 
Stooping to parody is no substitute for an argument.

It's also symbolic of a confession, that you've got nothing boys.

Nihilism dressed up as higher learning....Pie Eyed to a tee.
What are you talking about.

"You've got nuthin" is probably one of the worst posts I see around the place.

Argue the point, don't just post a pompous "I win". It is really ****ing irritating and no doubt one of the reasons you are blocked from a number of boards on BF.
 
Nevertheless....It's still dependent upon the perfectly aligned set of preconditional circumstances on earth. Regardless of how many times life has supposedly emerged, it's still the same petrie-dish & it still doesn't explain mankind's consciousness.
The consciousness didnt just drop from the sky or put in there by a magic man ol mate. It evolved, follow the evolution from homo erectus and see the evolution of intelligence. The fact that Neanderthals who are extinct were no less intelligent than an average human speaks volumes. An average IQ of Homo habilis for example was 53! that was excellent for primitive species trying to survive in a crazy world.

Again you are following a similar pattern of argument, "i dont know hence.....". Well then you must explain how did the intermediate species get there? and how come their evolution of intelligence matches the evolutionary map perfectly?
 
What are you talking about.

"You've got nuthin" is probably one of the worst posts I see around the place.

Argue the point, don't just post a pompous "I win". It is really ******* irritating and no doubt one of the reasons you are blocked from a number of boards on BF.

It was in direct response to your mate; Pie eyed's faux post crap above.

Looks like it's one rule for those who agree with Chief & another for those who don't!

And do you really want to get into a public spat as to the ACTUAL reasons for my other board bans???

They were all political & you know it!
 
I've got no issue with sentience Jason....But do animals have a conscience?

What is it, that distinguishes mankind from the animal kingdom?....And how do we account for that difference in evolutionary theory?

Why do you think there are monogamous animals if they dont have conscience?


Science has shown that individuality - consciousness, self-awareness - is no longer a unique human property. That poses all kinds of challenges.
Ethics Professor Tom White, Loyola Marymount University of Los Angeles

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-17116882
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It was in direct response to your mate; Pie eyed's faux post crap above.

Looks like it's one rule for those who agree with Chief & another for those who don't!

And do you really want to get into a public spat as to the ACTUAL reasons for my other board bans???

They were all political & you know it!

Political??

In any case just talk about the topic. We don't need your wannabe gadfly act. We just don't.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
The consciousness didnt just drop from the sky or put in there by a magic man ol mate. It evolved, follow the evolution from homo erectus and see the evolution of intelligence. The fact that Neanderthals who are extinct were no less intelligent than an average human speaks volumes. An average IQ of Homo habilis for example was 53! that was excellent for primitive species trying to survive in a crazy world.

Again you are following a similar pattern of argument, "i dont know hence.....". Well then you must explain how did the intermediate species get there? and how come their evolution of intelligence matches the evolutionary map perfectly?

Well you see, this is my point....If Neanderthals & Homo Erectus were so intelligent, relatively speaking, then how is it that none survived?...After all, there are many species of monkeys.

Yet, If you travel all around the globe....From the Inuit of the North pole, to the pygmy tribes in the jungles of Brazil....All you find are Homo Sapiens!

While over the same period, Mr Crocodile has not evolved one iota.....Don't you find this kind of odd?....I know I do.
 
Well you see, this is my point....If Neanderthals & Homo Erectus were so intelligent, relatively speaking, then how is it that none survived?...After all, there are many species of monkeys.

Yet, If you travel all around the globe....From the Inuit of the North pole, to the pygmy tribes in the jungles of Brazil....All you find are Homo Sapiens!

While over the same period, Mr Crocodile has not evolved one iota.....Don't you find this kind of odd?....I know I do.
Intelligence doesn't automatically denote survival, especially if other, more intelligent species are in competition with you. There are other factors too - species which have more offspring will overwhelm via sheer numbers.

Crocodiles suit their environment extremely well, hence why any changes to them over the course of millions of years have been minor.

Sent from my D5803 using Tapatalk
 
Why do you think there are monogamous animals if they dont have conscience?


Science has shown that individuality - consciousness, self-awareness - is no longer a unique human property. That poses all kinds of challenges.
Ethics Professor Tom White, Loyola Marymount University of Los Angeles

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-17116882

I agree with certain contexts of that article....Animals & man certainly partake in many shared characteristics....But I'd still agree with Aristotle in saying that the divine spark of reason, along with the thin outer layer of our brains; Significantly divides us from all other creatures in a very unique way.

I'd reckon that point to be self-evident. Scientific animal psychology articles not withstanding.
 
It was in direct response to your mate; Pie eyed's faux post crap above.

Looks like it's one rule for those who agree with Chief & another for those who don't!

And do you really want to get into a public spat as to the ACTUAL reasons for my other board bans???

They were all political & you know it!
while you can at times have a condescending manner i have never found anything you have said ban worthy.

although i probably don't visit all the same threads you do, you may just be a very naughty boy and not so profound as you display here on occasion.:)
 
Well you see, this is my point....If Neanderthals & Homo Erectus were so intelligent, relatively speaking, then how is it that none survived?...After all, there are many species of monkeys.

Yet, If you travel all around the globe....From the Inuit of the North pole, to the pygmy tribes in the jungles of Brazil....All you find are Homo Sapiens!

While over the same period, Mr Crocodile has not evolved one iota.....Don't you find this kind of odd?....I know I do.

There are many theories regarding that, some say neaderthals mated with homo sapiens, some say they were extinct cause of environmental reasons, no one knows the answer to the question.. Whole H.E were not as intelligent as homo sapiens, homo sapiens came from H.E and H.H. Neaderthals are our cousins...humans didnt evolve from Neanderthals. The evolution of intelligence can be seen from H.H. H.E to H.S clearly, IQ inceases from specie to specie.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I agree with certain contexts of that article....Animals & man certainly partake in many shared characteristics....But I'd still agree with Aristotle in saying that the divine spark of reason, along with the thin outer layer of our brains; Significantly divides us from all other creatures in a very unique way.

I'd reckon that point to be self-evident. Scientific animal psychology articles not withstanding.

My point was conscience is not unique to humans. Dolphins have conscience for example, so much so many scientists have called for equal rights between humans and dolphins. H.S are on the top of the evolutionary tree are you surprised that we are at top in terms of reasoning? but conscience is not UNIQUE to humans
 
There are many theories regarding that, some say neaderthals mated with homo sapiens, some say they were extinct cause of environmental reasons, no one knows the answer to the question.. Whole H.E were not as intelligent as homo sapiens, homo sapiens came from H.E and H.H. Neaderthals are our cousins...humans didnt evolve from Neanderthals. The evolution of intelligence can be seen from H.H. H.E to H.S clearly, IQ inceases from specie to specie.

And yet, they still remain distinct species all the same....Much as an Orangutan, a Gorilla & a Spider Monkey are unique.

But I still feel you haven't adequately addressed the universal uniformity of so many unique tribes of Homo Sapiens, all emerging in seeming synchronicity.


My point was conscience is not unique to humans. Dolphins have conscience for example, so much so many scientists have called for equal rights between humans and dolphins. H.S are on the top of the evolutionary tree are you surprised that we are at top in terms of reasoning? but conscience is not UNIQUE to humans


I'm aware that Dolphins,, Elephants & Whales have larger brains than humans, but it's not like they can alter their environment like we can....That transcendent, abstract ability is a pretty formidable difference maker.....Wouldn't you agree?

.
 
And yet, they still remain distinct species all the same....Much as an Orangutan, a Gorilla & a Spider Monkey are unique.

But I still feel you haven't adequately addressed the universal uniformity of so many unique tribes of Homo Sapiens, all emerging in seeming synchronicity.
Not really, you need to read up on Neaderthals more.Perhaps the most crucial advantage Homo sapiens had over Neanderthals.... was our preference for social organization, whereas evidence suggests that Neanderthals did not have the same kind of social relationships. Having more people around means better chances of finding resources in times of scarcity and working efficiently.
There's a growing body of research that suggests that Neanderthals demonstrated higher cognitive functions that we tend to associate with Homo sapiens. What our survival and their extinction means was that our brains were better suited to the challenges of survival at the time, even though their bodies might have been the more capable.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...ient-art-of-interior-design-180948094/?no-ist

You need to read this, Humans were not that much superior to Neanderthals.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096424


People might think "if they were smart why did they go extinct?" but extinction has to do with many things besides intelligence. In some cases intelligence might make a species more likely to go extinct.

There is no evidence to support cognitive inferiority or cognitive superiority or equality, but their brains were definitely larger.







I'm aware that Dolphins,, Elephants & Whales have larger brains than humans, but it's not like they can alter their environment like we can....That transcendent, abstract ability is a pretty formidable difference maker.....Wouldn't you agree?

.

Cause they are way below the evolutionary chain than H.S. Bigger brain doesnt necessarily mean a better brain. We are at the top of the evolutionary ladder.

 
Not really, you need to read up on Neaderthals more.Perhaps the most crucial advantage Homo sapiens had over Neanderthals.... was our preference for social organization, whereas evidence suggests that Neanderthals did not have the same kind of social relationships. Having more people around means better chances of finding resources in times of scarcity and working efficiently.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...ient-art-of-interior-design-180948094/?no-ist

You need to read this, Humans were not that much superior to Neanderthals.

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0096424


People might think "if they were smart why did they go extinct?" but extinction has to do with many things besides intelligence. In some cases intelligence might make a species more likely to go extinct.

There is no evidence to support cognitive inferiority or cognitive superiority or equality, but their brains were definitely larger.

Cause they are way below the evolutionary chain than H.S. Bigger brain doesnt necessarily mean a better brain. We are at the top of the evolutionary ladder.

I'm guessing you missed the gist of my post, but having re-read it, I can see my point wasn't framed so well.

Given Neanderthal man, Homo Erectus & Homo Sapiens are distinct species; much as Orangutans, Gorillas & Spider Monkeys are!...Then how can one species mate with the other to produce a 3rd species?

You also seem to be claiming here, that a bigger brain & higher intelligence doesn't guarantee survival success, on the one hand....While claiming that humans somehow superseded Neanderthals & Homo Erectus BECAUSE of our superior intelligence.

Now, even assuming we did 'evolve' from these 2 entirely different species....If we came from them, then where did our extra intelligence come from?

You can see my confusion surely?....More than this....Given their relatively high intelligence, you'd of thought at least a small pocket of Neanderthals or Homo Erectus would still be extant somewhere....After all, the world has only just become fully explored quite recently.

Where are all these other 'species' of Homonids?....After all, there are plenty of different monkey species?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom