Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[Lebbo73]

No. That's why I'm asking. What did you mean?

Only a hardcore feminist would put up the type of fight for so called female inequality that KoB has!

 

[cartwright]

Only a hardcore feminist would put up the type of fight for so called female inequality that KoB has!

Oh, that's what you meant? It read as though you were insinuating that women make things up. glad I cleared that up.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Really? In your experience, as a woman, how many times have you had to resort to the "I have a boyfriend" card, to be left alone?

How did you interpret that paragraph to deduce I was a woman?

I am not.

 

[cartwright]

How did you interpret that paragraph to deduce I was a woman?

I am not.

Ah. So you have no experience of telling a man you're not interested - And that being ignored until you say you have a boyfriend?

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Ah. So you have no experience of telling a man you're not interested - And that being ignored until you say you have a boyfriend?

The point is its not about respecting a man...

This point can't be defended, and you're looking silly trying to.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

"Maggie5 likes" pro feminist idiocy.

It's the Feminism thread staple. God forbid she actually try and say anything herself.

 

[Maggie5]

"Maggie5 likes" pro feminist idiocy.

It's the Feminism thread staple. God forbid she actually try and say anything herself.

Aww, you are still upset because I didn't play your game, you poor petal.

 

[cartwright]

The point is its not about respecting a man...

This point can't be defended, and you're looking silly trying to.

So, why do men repeatedly do this?
You said there's no man alive that stops because they respect the man, & that they stop because she "clearly isn't interested"...even though she's already declined.

Why was her answer of "no" ignored, but when she says she is in a relationship, that is accepted?

If it's not about respecting another man & not respecting her valid answer of simply "no", what is it?

 

[cartwright]

"Maggie5 likes" pro feminist idiocy.

It's the Feminism thread staple. God forbid she actually try and say anything herself.

we don't need your running commentary on other peoples "likes".

 

[Raz0r6ack]

So, why do men repeatedly do this?
You said there's no man alive that stops because they respect the man, & that they stop because she "clearly isn't interested"...even though she's already declined.

Why was her answer of "no" ignored, but when she says she is in a relationship, that is accepted?

If it's not about respecting another man & not respecting her valid answer of simply "no", what is it?

Everyone wants what they can't have.

 

[cartwright]

Everyone wants what they can't have.

Hmm. Well, that's better than pretending it doesn't happen.

...But the answer is already a no, regardless.

 

[Lebbo73]

Oh, that's what you meant? It read as though you were insinuating that women make things up. glad I cleared that up.

Some do make things up. I thought I said!

 

[romeohwho]

This whole discussion is premised on a silly article by a man who seeks to be controversial and claims to speak for others.
More interesting to me Flowers, is that you'd happily go out with someone who has a partner!

 

[FlowersByIrene]

This whole discussion is premised on a silly article by a man who seeks to be controversial and claims to speak for others.
More interesting to me Flowers, is that you'd happily go out with someone who has a partner!

Not go out with romeo, but have a bit of fun with. For sure

Why do i care if they ruin their relationship? Haha

 

[Chief]

Not go out with romeo, but have a bit of fun with. For sure

Why do i care if they ruin their relationship? Haha

How macho!

 

[Illinois Nazi]

How macho!

It could be argued that it's the person actually in the relationship who should care enough not to ruin it.

 

[Chief]

It could be argued that it's the person actually in the relationship who should care enough not to ruin it.

I was complimenting him on his manliness.

 

[Bomberboyokay]

 

[Randomizor]

Don't care how she has aged but that method of writing hurts my brain.

Who's been saying that by the way?

 

[Procrastinator35]

I was complimenting him on his manliness.

No you weren't.

Amorality doesn't discriminate between the sexes.

 

[armpit]

Seen Suffragette? It's a good look at why a certain type of woman will get angry. If that's the rub.

 

[Chief]

No you weren't.

Amorality doesn't discriminate between the sexes.

You mean boasting about getting off with an attached person isn't the mark of a robustly heterosexual man? What is happening to our country??

 

[Procrastinator35]

You mean boasting about getting off with an attached person isn't the mark of a robustly heterosexual man? What is happening to our country??

Given it was dressed-up in hypothetical hyperbole (An accurate description of most types of such claims anyhow) then no.

As to the state of the nation: It's called political correctness....With Feminism being a subset thereof. (Although you'll still get your typical misogynistic local pub dero, mouthing off about some local tart.) You know, The usual betrayal of his own inner feelings of worthlessness.

 

[evo]

 

[PetrikDngerfild]

I have no sympathy for fat women. There are far worse disadvantaged people among us who work far harder and receive less recognition then the fattest of women, all because they're not 50% of the population the media can currently market an issue out of, they don't get a voice or get to become a media market.

Fat women are the most entitled drama queens you will find. If it's that big an issue it's a choice just stop eating and getting smashed eating junk food every weekend. If Carrie Fisher really cared about her weight she'd take 10 minutes of her free time to educate herself on the laws of energy and how calories work.