- Sep 21, 2009
- 16,746
- 14,953
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Yes...Were you after actual answers to those questions?
Do you consider exploratory questions, to be "gotcha's"???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes...Were you after actual answers to those questions?
You made a statement, you backed yourself and insisted you were serious about your statement.Were you after actual answers to those questions?
Yes...
Do you consider exploratory questions, to be "gotcha's"???
You made a statement, you backed yourself and insisted you were serious about your statement.
Then I question you to support your statement.
NOOOWW... is when you ask me what I mean.
I understand how you view me, now.
Wishy washy bullshit. You confirmed you were serious, I asked you to support it, now you want to engage with good faith. Piss off.Well I saw those questions as you trying to trap him into some sort of argument, not really related to what his point was. I thought of that as a "gotcha" question, I'm actually not sure of the definition I must admit.
Well I was trying to confirm what you meant by it, I guess generally I try to interpret things on face value. I just thought I'd check exactly what you meant by it. Though I'm still fairly convinced you were trying to stir the pot with those questions, maybe you weren't.
Are you suggesting that you have to be a feminist to fight for women's rights?It's related to the sudden care that usually 'right wing' posters who would hate to ever be considered a feminist... suddenly are fighting for women's rights (only against the trans community).
I'm sorry, I don't mean to offend you.Are you suggesting that you have to be a feminist to fight for women's rights?
If so, that's some either either you got going there, which is certainly not the case.
I'm sorry, I don't mean to offend you.
I'm sorry if I've offended you.Offended? What gave you the idea I'm offended?
Hope you're not gonna on one of your incorrect assumptions spree about me again.
Wishy washy bullshit. You confirmed you were serious, I asked you to support it, now you want to engage with good faith. Piss off.
Tag alonngYou made a statement, you backed yourself and insisted you were serious about your statement.
Then I question you to support your statement.
NOOOWW... is when you ask me what I mean.
I understand how you view me, now.
I'm sorry if I've offended you.
You're free to attempt to explain your position.Um ok, well there you have it. I hope you have a great evening.
Your attempts to goad me into replies, after the mods tore me a new a-hole from our last conversation, shows that you just took advantage of them.You haven't, could you explain why you would think that?
Would you like me to help you? Or are you looking for some easy 'likes'?I'm struggling to make sense of the last couple pages of this thread.
Please do.Would you like me to help you? Or are you looking for some easy 'likes'?
Do you want to highlight an area? Or would you like me to address the posts that you've 'liked'?Please do.
Why would he need you to address posts that he's already liked? It'd make much more sense to address the ones he didn't likeDo you want to highlight an area? Or would you like me to address the posts that you've 'liked'?
I haven't liked any posts in the past 4 pages, and probably more. I haven't looked further than that.Do you want to highlight an area? Or would you like me to address the posts that you've 'liked'?
What do you mean?Why would he need you to address posts that he's already liked? It'd make much more sense to address the ones he didn't like
View attachment 1430963
Post 661, on this page... I mean... Did you just forget???
Oh yeah... My bad.
If he liked a post then they're not the ones confusing himWhat do you mean?