I wonder what the chances are of Will not even getting the GOTW nom for yesterday’s miracle. All it might take is a good-ordinary effort from a Coll/Ess/Rich player today.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Its a better goal than Wells I think won GOTY from the goal square with the same movement. To beat it, it will have to be something completely incredibleI wonder what the chances are of Will not even getting the GOTW nom for yesterday’s miracle. All it might take is a good-ordinary effort from a Coll/Ess/Rich player today.
No, it just needs a nomination from a more popular club.Its a better goal than Wells I think won GOTY from the goal square with the same movement. To beat it, it will have to be something completely incredible
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No, it just needs a nomination from a more popular club.
I mean Himmelberg not winning mark of the week a couple back shows it does happen. Fan votes are pretty stupid in this senseThis weird victim mentality about the media must get tiring. There was plenty of celebration about Will’s goal yesterday.
Aren’t Goal of the Week and Mark of the Week, voted on each week by the public on the AFL website?This weird victim mentality about the media must get tiring. There was plenty of celebration about Will’s goal yesterday.
I had the same thought last night.I wonder what the chances are of Will not even getting the GOTW nom for yesterday’s miracle. All it might take is a good-ordinary effort from a Coll/Ess/Rich player today.
Aren’t Goal of the Week and Mark of the Week, voted on each week by the public on the AFL website?
So what Mr Ripper is alluding to, is that they are in effect popularity votes, and if Ginnivan is one of the three nominations for Goal of the Week, then just by sheer weight of membership numbers, the Collingwood fans would sink Will’s nomination.
Up yer nose with a rubber hose barbYeah sorry Mr Ripper you were right. No need for me to be snarky like that either.
Was that Vinnie Barbarino? OR was it Brabarino.Up yer nose with a rubber hose barb
He always takes the chance to talk down anything about the lions. Totally hates usThat Lloyd bloke on Sunday Footy show wasnt that impressed and said it was to early to tell.
What a sourpuss and still cant believe that he actually won goal of the year one time for back heeling it about a metre out
We are 15 bounces behind the next team for bounces, found that interesting. 7 only so far this year.
It’s a basic of umpiring - personally I think umpiring in a 4 is a bad idea for a number of reasons - if done correctly a 3 is perfectInteresting that you rarely hear coaches speak about umps but both Fages and Fly were critical in their pressers this week re a perceived failure by the umps to properly award frees to protect the heads of players.
I like four because it gives you one forward, one back, and one either side of the contest. But it only works if they pay the frees.It’s a basic of umpiring - personally I think umpiring in a 4 is a bad idea for a number of reasons - if done correctly a 3 is perfect
I suspect there's a bit of "I don't want to tread on my mates toes by blowing the whistle if he/she doesn't" and the end result is neither do.I like four because it gives you one forward, one back, and one either side of the contest. But it only works if they pay the frees.
The theory is great but in practice…2’s work well in community footy because it’s easy to get in synch with your partner, from a flow point of view 3’s are ideal because you should get an opportunity to rest a bit but you’ve added another interpretation, 4’s the benefit that they were supposed to provide has not happened and all you’ve added is another interpretation. Personally, umpiringI like four because it gives you one forward, one back, and one either side of the contest. But it only works if they pay the frees.
I can only speak from experience, when I started I was of the view that if you saw it, you blew your whistle and you paid it - regardless of whether you were in control or not. I took up umpiring in my 40’s having played and coached. I had umpired reserves as a club umpire and thought it would be an easy transition but it wasn’t the technical stuff is crucial and positioning is everything. I’d done a few weeks of juniors and felt I was ready for a run in the Seniors in the minor league when I overruled a stalwart in an Under 16 game. At the next break he gave it to me (despite my decision being correct). Later he bagged my performance to the Selectors with the upshot being I spent a further 4 weeks umpiring kids. Eventually the selector ran with me and after the game said “You’re fine, you’re ready to do Seniors“ I said yeah I know I’ve been ready for about a month but…I suspect there's a bit of "I don't want to tread on my mates toes by blowing the whistle if he/she doesn't" and the end result is neither do.