Remove this Banner Ad

News Front and Square

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

BECAUSE of a finals campaign last year that comprised a ho-hum win at home over a hobbled Hawthorn and a meek surrender to Geelong at the MCG the following week and because - well, it is Fremantle after all - there was one team generally regarded as being susceptible to a tumble from the top eight in 2011.

This column had Freo in the eight, but only just, at the start of the season. Now we are reconsidering that on the back of a win over the Western Bulldogs on Monday night which, while hard to watch at times given the skill errors and the turnovers, was edge-of-your-seat stuff for the entire final quarter.

In the space of 30 pulsating minutes, Fremantle had the game won, then lost, then won again, to suggest that the dire pre-season prognostications might have been a touch premature.

And the heroes in purple were two of the more unlikely you would expect to find. Jay van Berlo, the until now unheralded younger brother of Adelaide skipper Nathan, kicked four goals, while the oft-maligned Kepler Bradley also kicked four and dazzled the 37,000 fans at Patersons Stadium with some rarely seen skills and athleticism.

It was the sign of a good team. Usual match-winners Matthew Pavlich and David Mundy (apart from an electrifying opening to the final term when he won some key clearances) didn't do all that much. Nor did Stephen Hill or the club's 2011 pin-up boy, Nathan Fyfe.

But the Fremantle is a team with sound structures. Ryan Crowley, Antoni Grover, Luke McPharlin, Paul Duffield, Matthew de Boer and Chris Mayne don't get a lot of fanfare outside Western Australia, but they get the job done for Mark Harvey on a weekly basis.

The race for the double-chance this year is particularly wide open. Geelong, Hawthorn, Carlton and the Western Bulldogs have variously staked a claim. But why not Fremantle?

With three games of their next seven at the MCG (Richmond in round seven, Hawthorn in round 11 and Melbourne two weeks later), we will have a fair idea whether Fremantle's gameplan stacks up away from the cauldron it has created at Patersons Stadium - every bit as intimidating as West Coast enjoyed a few years back - and at the ground where the important finals are played and won.

But for now, Harvey deserves tremendous praise for his work in transforming the AFL's perennial underachievers into a potentially great side.



http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/112429/default.aspx
 
...

With three games of their next seven at the MCG (Richmond in round seven, Hawthorn in round 11 and Melbourne two weeks later), we will have a fair idea whether Fremantle's gameplan stacks up away from the cauldron it has created at Patersons Stadium - every bit as intimidating as West Coast enjoyed a few years back - and at the ground where the important finals are played and won.

I think this is the key bit. Our next travel games are:

Richmond @ MCG
PA @ Footy Park
Hawks @ MCG

In reality only Hawks should give us trouble if we're the real deal. Throw in a derby and a home game vs Saints, and though it's not as easy as it might seem, a top team would get 4 of those 5 without much fuss. The next few weeks will really show us where we're at.
 
I think this is the key bit. Our next travel games are:

Richmond @ MCG
PA @ Footy Park
Hawks @ MCG

In reality only Hawks should give us trouble if we're the real deal. Throw in a derby and a home game vs Saints, and though it's not as easy as it might seem, a top team would get 4 of those 5 without much fuss. The next few weeks will really show us where we're at.

Nevertheless, there will be mass negativity & Hysteria the second one of these games are dropped..
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The MCG games will be interesting. A lot depends on who is available. We were starting the scrape the barrel a bit last week in terms of the 22 without Broughton. Hopefully Barlow, Silvagni, Mz, these types will start being available in the weeks after the bye.
Does our gameplan translate to the G? It's not unlike Collingwoods so you would think so. Depends if we have the runner to pull it off on what I believe is a wider ground than ours?
 
Really poor article IMO.

"a ho-hum win at home over a hobbled Hawthorn" :rolleyes:
Plenty of "experts" tipped the "hobbled Hawks" to win that game.

"well, it is Fremantle after all" :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

"while the oft-maligned Kepler Bradley also kicked four and dazzled the 37,000 fans at Patersons Stadium with some rarely seen skills and athleticism."
Oft-maligned 3 years ago when he was at another club.

"Usual match-winners Matthew Pavlich and David Mundy didn't do all that much."
I thought he played well.
 
The MCG games will be interesting. A lot depends on who is available. We were starting the scrape the barrel a bit last week in terms of the 22 without Broughton. Hopefully Barlow, Silvagni, Mz, these types will start being available in the weeks after the bye.
Does our gameplan translate to the G? It's not unlike Collingwoods so you would think so. Depends if we have the runner to pull it off on what I believe is a wider ground than ours?

MCG is much much wider and slightly shorter. We play a similar style to Collingwood, but they are extremely good at not getting caught deep in the pockets at both ends unless its to serve a purpose (eg. slow down the game, work for an out of bounds play etc.). I'm really looking fwd to those games, but I'd say we're giving a few goals away simply for not being used to the ground and our opposition teams being very used to it (eg. Richmond).

BTW, on the OP, besides the MCG bit, the rest of the article is somewhere between ho-hum to total BS.
 
I think 'front and square' was nothing of the sort on Monday night - more like asleep on the couch. Fyfe and Mundy quiet:confused: Article is condescending rubbish. The stereotypes about players not being rated in the 'east' are silly. I've yet to observe a footy commentator not rate McPharlin as amongst the best in the business, e.g, Roos' multiple references to Freo's 'athletic key defenders' in explaining why Petrie and Hansen didn't get a kick at Subi the other day.

Did like the 'potentially great side' bit at the end though.:)
 
It is a rather poorly written and somewhat condescending tone throughout the article. Wouldn't really expect that on the AFL site.

The "ho hum" 2010 final win.... which every man and his dog other than some Freo's supporters would said the Hawks would win. It was a great win and offered evidence of Fremantle's progression to becoming a contender.

It almost seems like a bit of a troll.
 
I think 'front and square' was nothing of the sort on Monday night - more like asleep on the couch. Fyfe and Mundy quiet:confused: Article is condescending rubbish. The stereotypes about players not being rated in the 'east' are silly. I've yet to observe a footy commentator not rate McPharlin as amongst the best in the business, e.g, Roos' multiple references to Freo's 'athletic key defenders' in explaining why Petrie and Hansen didn't get a kick at Subi the other day.

Did like the 'potentially great side' bit at the end though.:)

The bit that kills me atm is Collingwood supporters bucketing on about how good Tarrant is - like we didnt already know
 
Tarrant will be AA FB this year despite looking a bit slower than he did at Freo, and simply because he plays for Collingwood.


to be fair to the AA selectors, Taz was probably injured too much last season to be selected. He was a better than most.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

News Front and Square

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top