ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
And I'd still have it over Etihad.
Yeah, technically there is nothing wrong with Etihad.
When built, it was new, comfortable, had a roof etc.
But I have never really warmed to it (and neither has our squad!).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And I'd still have it over Etihad.
Waverley Park was awesome.
Except for the rain, the wind, the cold, the mud, the lack of public transport, the parking bottlnecks, the crappy screen, the Hawks, the Saints.....
Don't forget that the ground was so big that if you sat on the boundary you couldn't see what was happening on the other side of the oval due to the hump in the middle of the groundWaverley Park was awesome.
Except for the rain, the wind, the cold, the mud, the lack of public transport, the parking bottlnecks, the crappy screen, the Hawks, the Saints.....
I used to go with my Dad and his mates, they would have a BBQ after the game to avoid the carnage.That damn carpark.
#ArcticPark
You just needed to accept that you weren't getting out until 5.30 and kick the footy on the oval instead of waiting in your car.I used to go with my Dad and his mates, they would have a BBQ after the game to avoid the carnage.
Don't forget that the ground was so big that if you sat on the boundary you couldn't see what was happening on the other side of the oval due to the curvature of the earth
Worth going for Harry’s goal
Whether the Swans pay a negotiated amount or the full year’s salary, I expect the full year’s salary to be included in the Swans’salary cap.
Think of it this way.
Franklin retires with 3 years to go. Swans pay him say 50% of his 3 years’ full salary as a negotiated amount. The negotiated amount is included in the first year’s salary cap. The second year the Swans pay significantly less than the salary cap, allowing the Swans to pay 105% of the cap in year 3. Swans go and get the best free agent in year 3.
If Swans are required to include the full amount in the salary cap (even if they only pay the negotiated amount) then they cannot get the best free agent, etc. as quickly.
EDIT: Or more simply, if the Swans only have to include say half of Tippet’s salary in the 2018 cap, then it can go and get the best free agent next year / retain all its best players (rather than lose one to keep the rest).
Actually they pay it all no matter what. That’s part of the deal that allows for long term deals.
From the afl to the swans
“An explicit acknowledgement that the long-term specific financial commitment over the nine-year agreement will apply to the Swans' total player payments for each of the nine years, regardless of how many years Franklin is available to play for the club."
I expect it would be the same for Tippett....especially as it would be like compo claim...retiring due to injury.
Is that right? Papers saying he had one year left. If you're right I agree. I always thought the same too when Buddy signed on for 10 years...as if
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
My bad, contracted to the end of 2018. So just this year’s salary. Slap on the wrist for the Swans really.
KURT Tippett’s shock retirement is set to put the Swans back in the free agent market for the first time since they landed Lance Franklin at the end of the 2013 season.
It won’t be another $10 million Buddy deal but the 2019 and 2020 salary cap space freed up by Tippett’s premature departure will open the doors to a quality player.
Juuust in time to help them make a play for Lynch.And there you have it, the Swans get salary cap relief for not paying Tippett out in full (I can understand Eddie and other clubs complaining on this one):
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...d/news-story/f9d9a94c8540b7746b6fc77b5abd85fe
KURT Tippett’s shock retirement is set to put the Swans back in the free agent market for the first time since they landed Lance Franklin at the end of the 2013 season.
It won’t be another $10 million Buddy deal but the 2019 and 2020 salary cap space freed up by Tippett’s premature departure will open the doors to a quality player.
...
We should offer Simmo a three year extension so we meet minimum SC requirements, then have him “retire” early so we have a war chest to throw at Shiel.
It was also reported the Tippet had re-signed on a lot less coin.And there you have it, the Swans get salary cap relief for not paying Tippett out in full (I can understand Eddie and other clubs complaining on this one):
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/s...d/news-story/f9d9a94c8540b7746b6fc77b5abd85fe