catempire
Premium Platinum
We absolutely shouldn’t and won’t.Something tells me we shouldn't write the possibility off entirely
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
We absolutely shouldn’t and won’t.Something tells me we shouldn't write the possibility off entirely
Looking at some vision of Bowes, the guy can play. Good mover, nice by foot. At worst he would be valuable midfield depth. We will be continuing to manage our older midfield players including Dangerfield and Duncan. He’d even be a reasonable inclusion for Tuohy too. Reckon he’d get more games than we may initially think. It’s unlikely we also get the charmed run with injuries we did this year too.
I think the market place is telling us to be very carefull about the location as well as draft talent. id not pick Phillipou. I have more confidence in Kneviit and the other inside mids we have .. than some others... but there is no certainly. Anyones opinion could be right or wrong.I'm on McKenzie, but absolutely agree that you couldn't go wrong with any of Clark, Phillipou or McKenzie, around that pick. Anything in the Top 10 looks like a very solid prospect, IMO
I think the success of the Dangerfield season, will give us confidence to manage the squad in more creative ways.
Squad depth could be our big advantage in prolonging careers and peaking in September.
A best 22 will only exist in finals, until then being in a squad of 30 will see you play most weeks, factoring in injuries and players managed.
Grand Final 23 - Selwood
+ Holmes, Neale, Dempsey, Bowes, Bruhn, Henry, Cooper Stephens, Menegola, Conway.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Somewhat disagree, I reckon there is something there. But as of right now, not a lot has been shown so completely understand your point.
Not sure he is high on our priority list...But will have enough pick in place if that happened for Ted Clohesy?
Not sure he is high on our priority list...
Yeah I know... There are only so many spots.I think he may just have to let him go. Shame but you cant have everyone
Yeah I know... There are only so many spots.
The defender from the Falcons, another Ollie... Ollie Northam is a prime candidate if we have a pick 50 left over.
In statistics, when you have a variable that doesn’t vary between observations it has no predictive power. The issue with your theory is that everyone has a single figure pick - both losers and winners - so it doesn’t mean anything as a predictor of success.I have been on about single figure picks ..what seems like years. I maintain a club the Premiership side almost always has a single figure pick that they have drafted ... when was the last club that won a flag without a single figure pick they drafted? Maybe Syd in 05? Not sure but it was long time ago....
That may be changing due to the fluidity of the market. If Horne Francis lands at Port it will not matter that they did not draft him. Bruhn and Henry will be good... but neither were considered single figure picks in their draft... so there is that... but that stuff can being flexible. If Sam Deking was on the open market now imagine what he would be worth.
If we have P7 ..and somehow we keep it. Great. Go to draft take one one of several players that appeal. Id think Mackenzie would almost push to play like Holmes did.
If we have P7 and somehow split it that might have a huge upside as well.
Do we split and use it to get Bruhn and Henry. It probably leaves us with P21 and etc. I think thats probably a little wasteful. The Ralph deal seems a better way to go if we get it done that way.
If we can use it in way to still get a us decent pick this year and a R1 next year... that might be something that could have Cameron like outcome. Lets think 12 months time. If we are serious about getting a OOC player next year ..having two R1 picks ..is a way to plan for that. It would give us a serious hand to ask about Tom Dek for example. I dont know what our cap situation will be like next year but retirements to come one would think we would have dollars.
Im not sure who we would split it with bu P7 gives us options. GWS? They will have a lot of picks.
P7 for basically little is a huge bonus. IF WE GET IT.
If we start dishing out the names of ITK posters I'd imagine they'll be OoTK pretty quickly.Hi everyone, pardon the intrusion. Currently working on a little project for the main board and I was hoping to grab the names of any ITK posters here on the Cats board. Cheers.
That is the point people say he is a VFL player will not get in our side, but the kid has talent, and we could have injuries and some old players will get a rest, so he will get a chanceI think it was Ralph or Twomey who mentioned that half the comp had expressed interest to his manager.
If he then chooses us, that is incredible. Still remember him selling candy to about 3 Geelong players basically without moving in GAJ’s 350th a couple of years ago. Should be in the highlight reel of that game I imagine if anyone’s interested in seeing what he could do around stoppages.
Deal will not involve any first rnd pick from us. We will probably send a future 2nd and 3/4th back to GC for their academy picks next year. The pick 7 they are including is the sweetener as we are taking on over 1.5 mil in salary they don’t want.I will make a prediction if Bowes is coming to us we will either:
1. Get Bowes and Pick 7 for 2023 R1
Or
2. Get Bowes and something less than pick 7 for something less than the 2023 R1
In other words, P7 is a free lunch and you know what they say about those.
S Hocking is going to use his influence as “secret” commandant of the AFL to increase team sizes from 22 to 25. Problem solved.Of all these possible recruits how many will actually make the side next year?
I will make a prediction if Bowes is coming to us we will either:
1. Get Bowes and Pick 7 for 2023 R1
Or
2. Get Bowes and something less than pick 7 for something less than the 2023 R1
In other words, P7 is a free lunch and you know what they say about those.
I never said having one ensure suscess... but not having one precludes success. It was indicative of talent level on the list ..as the draft was the main way to accrue enough high end talent that gave a side a chance to win a flag. Obviously , the GWS and Gold Coast example shows it guarantees nothing. To me its more like you can have 18 teams fit. Being fit doesn't not mean you win.. but being unfit ..almost ensures you will not win.In statistics, when you have a variable that doesn’t vary between observations it has no predictive power. The issue with your theory is that everyone has a single figure pick - both losers and winners - so it doesn’t mean anything as a predictor of success.
I don’t think we get 7 in that case.Deal will not involve any first rnd pick from us. We will probably send a future 2nd and 3/4th back to GC for their academy picks next year. The pick 7 they are including is the sweetener as we are taking on over 1.5 mil in salary they don’t want.
No they haven’t.Lol, but GC themselves have said it'll be for a Future 2nd sooo don't see how it will be a Future 1st, given we need that for one of Bruhn or Henry....
Examples?I never said having one ensure suscess... but not having one precludes success.
Lol. Since when is Jon Ralph a mouthpiece of Gold Coast.Lol rightio.
It was posted a few pages back, so if you'd kept track rather than just making your own assumptions and casually dismissing what anyone else has to say, you'd know that yes they have:
View attachment 1524545