Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
I never buy the argument of a weak draft, plenty of potentially good players aren't even considered a part of the draft pool, Close wasn't, Dempsey wasn't.
Also understates the value of development, guys like Z.Guthrie added nothing to the perceived value of the draft pool. There were 100 guys like Brad Close around until we turned him into an AFL player, there are 100 guys like Z.Guthrie in the U18s each year until we nurtured him into an AFL player. There are probably 10-30 or so Menegola's Tim Kelly's and Tom Stewarts out there, and every team has in the 2nd tier has a Tom Atkins' or two.
There are probably a thousand or so people nominating. Good scouting will find the one that has the mindset to take advantage of the environment. List management is about about is about identifying the need the player is to fill if not now than in three years.
I dont disagree with parts of that but there are clearly draft pools that are better than others,both in terms of type (ie some drafts have more quality kpp and some dont) but in overall A grade talent vs role players and in depth of A grade talent. You can find good role players in every draft if you scout and develop well but some drafts simply have better quality and depth in top end talent than others and the last 10-15 years show that.






