Goodes let off

[im rick james dog]

Happy with the Burgoyne decision.
Thought he was going for a fair bump before Hayes was tackled

Disapointed in the Goodes decision.
A cheap shot to the back of a player not expecting it. Deserved 1 week

 

[HighReeve]

odd? the tribunal is odd, off the ball forearm in back with considerable force..fells player.. you have to be kidding? Players have spent time off for a hell of a lot less. Can you explain how come he only got 125 points?
Do you people still applaud throw ins?

So you agree the tribunal is odd then?

It doesn't actually have anything to do with Goodes being a Sydney player.

 

[TheBloods]

doubt it.

I think there's a good chance...

The part that is wrong, is that he didn't at least get 1 match suspension.
You are saying what he did doesn't warrant a suspension, correct?
Explain then how a tummy tap with much less force is deemed worthy of suspension, if you can't see the anomalies then I'm afraid I was right the first time and you struggle with the concept of the game.

If you can't understand the difference between why Goodes is not out a week and Gehrig is out 1 week, then you'd best do some more reading...

 

[TheBloods]

No surprise.

Just follows the precedent set by Barry Hall in 05'.

The untouchable red and white.

Gutless tribunal.

No surprise.

Just follows the precedent set by numerous clueless posters already...

 

[yeah-nah]

how odd that the only people on here who think it's the right decision are Swans supporters..

Dunno if youve noticed but defending the indefensible with stoopid logic happens round here a fair bit when it comes to ones own team.

 

[Quinz]

Was the softest report I've ever seen.

You obviously missed this one:

[youtube]iRFEtYJg_BQ[/youtube]

 

[The Fireman]

So you agree the tribunal is odd then?

It doesn't actually have anything to do with Goodes being a Sydney player.

no, the tribunal has stuffed up again, couldn't care who Goodes played for,it just makes you guys look a bit silly sticking up for the tribunal on this.

 

[triplegee]

The issue here is that the new tribunal system based on points sometimes loses sight of what is fair and reasonable.

The "numbers" don't always tell the real story.

I think any "neutrals" who saw what Goodes did would agree that it deserved a week off. But if we're going to adopt a new points-based tribunal system then we need to accept what it delivers. We can't change the rules mid-stream.

 

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Awww did I hit a nerve? Me grow up LMAO whatever why don't you go stalk your boyfriend some more do you have any idea what the meaning of Obsessed is?

I better post this pic again so you pay attention to the post hes in just the right angle for you too enjoy!

You seem to really like that picture, a bit too much

 

[uncle dom]

No surprise.

Just follows the precedent set by numerous clueless posters already...

Mate just go to bed stop F@#KING posting

how many posts now 976....geek

 

[DeadlyAkkuret]

You obviously missed this one:

[youtube]iRFEtYJg_BQ[/youtube]

Atleast 2 weeks in that.

 

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Mate just go to bed stop F@#KING posting

how many posts now 976....geek

Sadly folks, that's the best comeback a Collingwood fan could come up with.

 

[TheBloods]

The issue here is that the new tribunal system based on points sometimes loses sight of what is fair and reasonable.

The "numbers" don't always tell the real story.

I think any "neutrals" who saw what Goodes did would agree that it deserved a week off. But if we're going to adopt a new points-based tribunal system then we need to accept what it delivers. We can't change the rules mid-stream.

Yes, I think that makes sense.

 

[The Fireman]

Dunno if youve noticed but defending the indefensible with stoopid logic happens round here a fair bit when it comes to ones own team.

Correct and it's full on here in this thread.
How embarrassment

 

[TheBloods]

Mate just go to bed stop F@#KING posting

how many posts now 976....geek

Keep trying - you may add something useful to the discussion yet...

 

[Quinz]

Atleast 2 weeks in that.

I agree, there's no place for diving in our game.

 

[Spiritof82]

Was the softest report I've ever seen. Goes to show that AFL really is becoming more like netball every day. Not surprised that the supporters of the softest clubs around are whinging the loudest. Should have been thrown out to begin with.

So a king hit behind play is a soft report now, suppose Leigh Matthews will be now appealing his de registration he got all those years ago for the same sort of play against Geelong. One rule for the Swines, another rule for the rest of the competition.

 

[Saul Hudson]

unbelievable...but that dirty, sniping, spineless jib will get his own one day

 

[TheBloods]

Correct and it's full on here in this thread.
How embarrassment

I'm still curious to know what part of the charge should have changed such that Goodes' received 1 week?

 

[TheBloods]

So a king hit behind play is a soft report now, suppose Leigh Matthews will be now appealing his de registration he got all those years ago for the same sort of play against Geelong. One rule for the Swines, another rule for the rest of the competition.

Okay... so you are comparing a king hit that broke Bruns' jaw, with being forcibly knocked to the ground that did no injury... okay...

 

[uncle dom]

Sadly folks, that's the best comeback a Collingwood fan could come up with.

sorry i want to be a sydney fan...sit behind a comptuer all day and watch pr0n and post on bigfooty...

 

[bleeding red and white]

What a joke.
What excuses did they use to get him off?
Because it was definately intentional,behind play and medium impact.
Christ,the guy wasn't even looking at Goodes when he snipered him.
GUTLESS GOODES.

gutless goodes? ha this bloke is a champion, if anyone Anthony 'Thug' Rocca is the gutless one. What's his record at the tribunal compared to Goodes? would love to know if you can tell me

 

[TheBloods]

I agree, there's no place for diving in our game.

...

 

[Schneiderman]

So a king hit behind play is a soft report now,

A nudge in the back is hardly a 'King Hit'. Soft. Like AFL is becoming.

 

[bleeding red and white]

I agree, there's no place for diving in our game.

no place for drugs ethier