If Carlton were prepared to take their salaries (and they could easily) Carlton could pick up these two for draft picks 100 & 101 just for the cap relief they would provide.
Would you be interested?
Would you be interested?
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Harford and Mercuri
- Thread starter scooter600x
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Moderator
- #2
Harford perhaps but I believe Mercuri is way too overpriced? We need some experience in the midfield but getting two with their salaries might rob us of some young 10 year player.
mercuri not worth the money...and cmon guys we dont want midfielders that will stay and retire in a couple of years...we need long lasting midfielders that as dennis pagan said will go for 10 years
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Moderator
- #5
We do need to take some chances though and a cheap Harford in the preseason draft or a mutually beneficial trade might be worth a shot. He was once a pretty good player before losing his way. Has a few years left too I believe. How old is he?
Trying to think outside the square and realising that we have few senior players and may trade some of them as well.
Trying to think outside the square and realising that we have few senior players and may trade some of them as well.
Daniel Harford is 26 years old and has played 153 games.
Only played 5 senior games this year (out of favour with selectors), was in Box Hills best each game.
In his 5 senior games he had limited game time but averaged -
12 possessions, 5 marks, 4 tackles.
Certainly not the worst bloke going around, and definetely could play 3 or 4 more years of senior footy. Might be worth a low draft pick if willing to take the salary ($300,000?).
Hawks could even agree to pay a portion of his salary!
Only played 5 senior games this year (out of favour with selectors), was in Box Hills best each game.
In his 5 senior games he had limited game time but averaged -
12 possessions, 5 marks, 4 tackles.
Certainly not the worst bloke going around, and definetely could play 3 or 4 more years of senior footy. Might be worth a low draft pick if willing to take the salary ($300,000?).
Hawks could even agree to pay a portion of his salary!
- Banned
- #7
He's worth the minimum wages, and I would take him for free with last pick in the preseason draft. Hawks would have to pay the rest of his wages. In other words, don't want him unless he comes for as close to free as possible.
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
