Remove this Banner Ad

Hirdy's tell all interview

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Armchair Critic said:
Once again you are making statements up, I have never heard James say that once
Click to expand...
"I've been roundly criticised for not telling my side of the story for the last six months but when I went to the ASADA interview, I gave my word to ASADA that I wouldn't talk about what happened in that interview because they didn't want me to pollute the process."

"I was asked by the football club not to talk on two or three occasions when I wanted to, which is fine, I'm not upset about that, because they didn't want me to pollute the process."

"I hope people have an understanding of why I have had to wait, it's been very difficult to have to hold your tongue, and I'm not saying that everything I'll say will be good and reflect well on myself but let's say the majority of it will be better than what's been put out there.
http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne...ed-says-gerard-whateley-on-fox-footy-afl-360/
 
Something is around the corner. Something big. I can feel it. If Hird didn't want to "tell all" due to ASADA's advice, then is it possible he is telling now because ASADA have already notified him of the investigation result? That means possible infractions very very soon. Certainly lines up with that article in the Australian.
 
Thrawn said:
Something is around the corner. Something big. I can feel it. If Hird didn't want to "tell all" due to ASADA's advice, then is it possible he is telling now because ASADA have already notified him of the investigation result? That means possible infractions very very soon. Certainly lines up with that article in the Australian.
Click to expand...


Not a Sherlock Homes style investigation but an interesting thought process.

Given that any infractions would almost CERTAINLY be appealed by Hird one can only deduce that you are incorrect.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

mxett said:
"I've been roundly criticised for not telling my side of the story for the last six months but when I went to the ASADA interview, I gave my word to ASADA that I wouldn't talk about what happened in that interview because they didn't want me to pollute the process."

"I was asked by the football club not to talk on two or three occasions when I wanted to, which is fine, I'm not upset about that, because they didn't want me to pollute the process."

"I hope people have an understanding of why I have had to wait, it's been very difficult to have to hold your tongue, and I'm not saying that everything I'll say will be good and reflect well on myself but let's say the majority of it will be better than what's been put out there.
http://www.triplem.com.au/melbourne...ed-says-gerard-whateley-on-fox-footy-afl-360/
Click to expand...


Fair enough then , I apologise. I had not seen that statement before
 
mxett said:
No, half truths are not necessarily deliberate lies
Click to expand...

Was "I haven't had any injections" which later changed to "I had 2 injections" a half truth or a flat out bald face lie. i lean towards the second one.
 
mxett said:
Can you find a quote where Hird denied having injections, or even mentioned them?

I'll wait here for you
Click to expand...
Here's where The weapon refers to little James saying it.

ESSENDON coach James Hird says his home has never been raided by the Australian Federal Police, as claimed by former Bombers fitness coach Dean Robinson.

  • Bombers coach James Hird says having an unchanged line-up is rare
    Getty Images
Robinson, in an explosive paid interview on Channel Seven on Wednesday night, claimed Hird's house was once raided by the AFP over a drugs investigation related to Hird's former personal trainer and convicted drug dealer Shane Charter.
"They've never raided my house," Hird told reporters on Thursday.
Robinson told Seven when sports scientist Stephen Dank joined Essendon on September 28, 2011, the pair went to Hird's home that night and were told of the alleged raid several years earlier.
"He told us that at 5am ... his house got raided," Robinson said.
"They went through cereal boxes, cupboards, everywhere, looking for things."
Robinson was stood down when the crisis broke on February 5 and resigned from Essendon last week. He intends to sue the club.
ASADA are close to finishing their investigation into the club.
Robinson claimed in the interview Hird drove Essendon's controversial supplements program and has been untouchable at the AFL club.
Robinson said Essendon midfielder David Zaharakis was the only player who did not become involved in last year's controversial supplements program.
Robinson said senior figures at the club, including former chief executive Ian Robson, knew exactly what was going on with the supplements program.
Hird said he had watched some of the interview, but had "definitely not" asked Robinson to investigate an untraceable testosterone cream, as claimed by the sacked fitness coach.
When asked if Robinson could be trusted, Hird said: "Who knows?"
Robinson also accused Hird of having "30-odd" injections of the drug Hexarelin, which is banned for players but not coaches.
Robinson said he saw Dank injecting the Essendon coach.
"I can confirm my lawyers have spoken with Steve Dank and he said that he did inject James Hird with Hexarelin on 30-odd occasions," Robinson said.
"I would be estimating they were weekly or bi-weekly injections for at least half the season.
"In this whole thing, his story has changed - he said he never had any injections, 'aw, I had two, I didn't know what they were'.
"Well, we know that's not the truth."
Asked if had confronted Hird about the the supplements program, Robinson said: "Who challenges James Hird at Essendon?
"I tried a couple of times but I learnt pretty quickly that was something you don't do."
Hird, arguably the most famous figure in Essendon history, is adamant he is innocent of any wrongdoing.
"It was a boys' club - whatever James Hird wanted, James Hird got," Robinson said.
"It was no expense spared, it was 'whatever it takes'.
"That was James Hird's attitude.
"His actions, the way he's handled himself, I have no respect for the guy any more.
"If he was honourable, he would stand down.
"... James Hird drove everything."
An Essendon spokesman said of Robinson's Hexarelin allegation: "This is an outrageous claim and will be legally challenged."
In a statement issued after the Robinson interview aired on Seven, Essendon described Robinson as a disgruntled, disaffected and discredited former employee of the AFL club.
The Bombers are seeking legal advice.
"The club acknowledges that Dean Robinson appears to be under an extreme amount of pressure as are a number of people who are employed at Essendon," the club said in a statement.
"However, the series of allegations made by Dean Robinson on Channel Seven tonight are totally without foundation.
"They are coming from a disgruntled, disaffected and discredited ex-employee.
"They are outrageous in nature and the club is seeking appropriate legal advice."
 
mxett said:
So you haven't found a quote from Hird, merely one from Robinson, who clearly has an issue with the way believes he was treated by Hird.

This isnt proof Hird lied. What if Robinson is lying?
Click to expand...
Ok mr head in the sand, what about James saying he only got injections of vitamins but more than 1 person and the charge sheet all say he receieved banned substances? More Lies.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

This is awesome news, I love you James, xo

Hirdy is our savior!
He was a scape goat, nothing more, nothing less.
James done NOTHING wrong.
 
Thrawn said:
Something is around the corner. Something big. I can feel it. If Hird didn't want to "tell all" due to ASADA's advice, then is it possible he is telling now because ASADA have already notified him of the investigation result? That means possible infractions very very soon. Certainly lines up with that article in the Australian.
Click to expand...
well, if you wish hard enough you never know eh
 
Thrawn said:
Something is around the corner. Something big. I can feel it. If Hird didn't want to "tell all" due to ASADA's advice, then is it possible he is telling now because ASADA have already notified him of the investigation result? That means possible infractions very very soon. Certainly lines up with that article in the Australian.
Click to expand...

Wish in one hand, shit in the other. See which one gets filled first!
 
Jimthegreat said:
He's not going to give you the truth. He's BS all the way through, why would it be different now. He's just going to spin his version.

Only gullible fools like yourself and the rest of your Essendon mates are going to believe him because it what you want to believe. Too blind and stupid to think for yourselves.
Click to expand...

you-cant-handle-the-truth-meme-generator-you-want-the-truth-you-can-t-handle-the-truth-9789dd.jpg
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Armchair Critic said:
Thursday April 11

Dank claims he injected Hird with a WADA-banned drug in 2012. ABC television's 7.30 program also reveals a series of text-message exchanges purportedly between Hird and Dank.

''These claims are horrifying to me, and are being made by a person or people who appear determined to destroy my reputation.'' James Hird

http://storify.com/AFL_official/essendon-saga-timeline-of-quotes
Click to expand...
Again, no direct quote about injections. You can't claim he lied if he hasn't stated anything specific that hasnt been disproven.
 
Garran Giant said:
this must be the only board in the AFL world where AFL fans are happy to excuse the Swans ruining the integrity of the competition
Click to expand...

It also must be the only board in any sporting world where people would be happy if a team gets off with doping their club because of a lack of records...

I know which one effects the integrity of the competition much, much more.
 
Cronos said:
It also must be the only board in any sporting world where people would be happy if a team gets off with doping their club because of a lack of records...

I know which one effects the integrity of the competition much, much more.
Click to expand...


it remains to be seen if that happens with the former
the point is that the latter has happened
 
Garran Giant said:
it remains to be seen if that happens with the former
the point is that the latter has happened
Click to expand...

Why do you think that a team following the rules put before it and agreed by the rest of the competition is worse than a team breaking the rules that everyone has to abide by?

That does not make sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom